+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Member Introductions & Personal Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=87)
+---- Forum: The Twilight Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=84)
+---- Thread: Fan Boys (/showthread.php?tid=65413)
RE: Fan Boys - Snooks - 03-07-2015 19:30
(03-07-2015 19:07 )SecretAgent Wrote:(03-07-2015 19:03 )Joey 27 Wrote: Well if he was going to attack any Fanboy it should have been me because i won the Fanboy of the year award last year not Rammy
Oh here we go! An argument now about who should be picked upon and insulted
Equal opportunities for being insulted.
It's only fair
.
RE: Fan Boys - skully - 03-07-2015 19:32
(03-07-2015 19:27 )M-L-L Wrote:perhaps this year there should be an award for "Best Fanboy of Rammy" : his posts seem to be subjected to such a level of forensic debate and comment that I can only suspect that hundreds of years from now it will be a rich field for media studies scholars as they struggle to understand just how and why he attracted such eager examination of his every pronouncement from everybody else.
That'll be a hotly contested award, I can picture the ceremony now, Rammy and his majestic beard (that I'm sure has magical powers) reading out the nominations, lot's of fingers being crossed, ''not me, not me'', and the winner is....[insert drum roll]....
RE: Fan Boys - Goodfella3041 - 03-07-2015 19:44
(03-07-2015 18:45 )HannahsPet Wrote: When you use the term this isnt a personal attack BUT your on a hiding to Nothing
And "with all due respect..." -- is almost always followed by something disrespectful
For that matter...
"Apparently..." -- is almost always followed by something that was apparent to no one
And something that is said to be "literally" something else, is almost never literally that other thing
It's a rich, rich language!
RE: Fan Boys - M-L-L - 03-07-2015 19:59
^
I don't mean to be a cunt about this, but......
RE: Fan Boys - Scottishbloke - 03-07-2015 20:19
(03-07-2015 19:06 )munch1917 Wrote: As someone who has been vocal on the subject of people over-quoting in posts, I can't help wondering why you felt the need to quote the original post in yours. It added nothing, you could have raised your points perfectly adequately without the quote, and as mentioned, we know you hate over-quoting!
I think you know exactly when a quote is justified and when its not. The post I quoted was on the very first page hence the reason for the reference
In order for to raise my point correctly I felt it was necessary to quote the opening post in order to justify my argument.
(03-07-2015 19:06 )munch1917 Wrote: was there another agenda here? Was the quote just a veiled attempt to have your own pop at Rammy by repeating and perpetuating the original comments, safe behind the excuse, 'wot guv, me guv, no guv, i didn't mean nuffing guv, I was just repeating wot the other bloke said guv, honest guv'!
No not at all, you're something of a fantasist if you thought otherwise. Yes I disagree with Rammy a lot of the time and other times I might agree with him as is the nature of this forum. Here I am disagreeing with you now, so I suppose I must now have an agenda against you too based on your argument
RE: Fan Boys - The Silent Majority - 03-07-2015 22:53
(03-07-2015 19:27 )M-L-L Wrote:
They'll call it the Cult of Rammy
What? No, I said Cult... CULT....FFS get your minds out of the gutter
RE: Fan Boys - The Silent Majority - 04-07-2015 09:27
(03-07-2015 18:34 )Scottishbloke Wrote: With regards to the above post again, sure it wasn't exactly the best way to go around introducing yourself to the forum but I have to ask would this be the case if this member had attacked anybody else apart from Rammy.
Substitute the word Rammyrascal with Scottishbloke, in the original post, and you would have been pm'ing the mods so fast your keyboard would have melted.
RE: Fan Boys - general drago - 04-07-2015 10:04
What's incredibly ironic is that people jump to rammys defence almost as fast as he jumps to the defence of the girls, I'm sure he can stick up for himself and doesn't need multiple people calling one person a cunt over and over again
RE: Fan Boys - setter1000 - 04-07-2015 12:22
(04-07-2015 10:04 )general drago Wrote: What's incredibly ironic is that people jump to rammys defence almost as fast as he jumps to the defence of the girls, I'm sure he can stick up for himself and doesn't need multiple people calling one person a cunt over and over again
Don't know if there is something I'm missing. Who is calling the OP a cunt and
Jumping to rammy's rescue on this thread?
RE: Fan Boys - M-L-L - 04-07-2015 12:38
I was a bit disappointed in this film to be honest, I thought it could have been a lot funnier - but the William Shatner cameo and the bit where the Star Trek nerds fight the Star Wars nerds was funny.Oh wait, this isn't the Last Film You Watched Thread....my mistake....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboys_(film)