+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=42986)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 30-08-2016 17:56
(30-08-2016 07:18 )jimminybob Wrote: I think we can be pretty sure it will be more of the same
Exactly - which isn't (for most of us anyway) necessarily a good thing. The performances are almost always office set based or bed set based and frankly her shows are getting stale. I'm all for the nakedness, she is brilliant at staying nude - there's other girls who seem reluctant to show anything.
But something needs to change for her shows, whether that means new producers or new sets is obviously open to debate - for me it needs a combination of both. Because both elements have shortcomings which are holding her shows back. I like Clare, I will almost certainly be including her in the end of year favourite list, purely on the number of sustained naked appearances. But as for winning Ultimate Babe at this moment in time there hasn't been enough variety in the performances in 2016 to justify that title. Just my opinion.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-08-2016 20:32
Clare is at her best when her senses are stirred.
I have said the same thing about Dannii Harwood in 2016 and do not regret it.
Clare and Dannii both respond well to a challenge, to something new and interesting. Even being the former and current Ultimate Babes does not exclude them from appearing to suffer through endless repetition. Both have suffered a similar fate in 2016.
Their routines have become too predictable and rather tired.
They are by no means unique in this regard imo.
The shows generally have become riddled with repetition, lack of set variety and lack of ideas. The same old moves played out time and again and in some cases outfits too.
But some babes have managed to do just enough to keep things interesting and stimulating enough for me to call.
I keep reading that call stats are the key.
Well call me a heretic but if S66 or any other channel want my calls they need to help provide the right level of visual stimulus to prompt me to pick up the phone. They also need to not adopt phone practices that give rise to frustration, anger and annoyance as well as a feeling of being ripped off
( Ahem Babestation 
)Anyway back to Clare
. Alas my call volume to her has ebbed away gradually over 2016 as my frustration seems to have grown in line with hers. The intensity of old imo simply is not what it once was.
It is stop start.
Sets are important and I have never wavered from that view.
There is little worse than just seeing the same routine in the same set over and over.
99% of Cara Bretts mini nightshows are action replays.
Clare and Dannii have been heading the same way.
Even after a small run of Lola's shows in the office I worry she might be going in the same direction
although maybe that's just paranoia .Other things could help though whether it be more POV, more use of props or more slow stripteases or more use of oil.
Anything just to keep things interesting.
And don't give up on something new after 15 minutes
.It doesn't sound as if the calls are exactly flooding in anyway
.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - greenray - 30-08-2016 21:05
The funny thing is Clare puts on very good shows most times she's on,but because she's not vastly improving she gets criticised,meanwhile Ashley & Alice are finally sliding their panties down and are getting loadsa praise!
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-08-2016 21:29
(30-08-2016 21:05 )greenray Wrote: The funny thing is Clare puts on very good shows most times she's on,but because she's not vastly improving she gets criticised,meanwhile Ashley & Alice are finally sliding their panties down and are getting loadsa praise!
All things are relative
.Ashley and Alice I would argue have worked up from a lower performance base than Clare
.In the case of Ashley her shows have become a smidgen more ambitious with every passing week over a sustained time span.
She has been clever with an interesting mix of outfits and mixed up set use too. And slowly but surely she has worked her way through various different poses, positions as well as the use of oil and then nudity and now nude hand thong.
Rightly or wrongly the expectation is arguably greater with Clare.
That comes with the territory of being so lauded for so long
.Ashley, whether it be through her own doing, her channels doing or a bit of both has managed to keep things ticking over nicely for a sustained period of time imo. But this is only my view and others may disagree
. At this point in time both Clare and Ashley would feature in my top ten babes of 2016.However speaking for myself Ashley would rate higher in my ten than Clare at present.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - greenray - 30-08-2016 22:33
Agree with much of the above,Snookered,and I'm certainly not anti Ashley or Alice,they are decent eye candy,and of course theres Ashley's arse!....
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-08-2016 22:40
Mmmmm.
Ashley's arse
Clare's arse
.Both please
.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Liverred - 30-08-2016 22:44
I recorded several hours of Clares show last night to watch back. What a waste of time.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 31-08-2016 08:39
(30-08-2016 22:44 )Liverred Wrote: I recorded several hours of Clares show last night to watch back. What a waste of time.A bit like all of last night too.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 31-08-2016 13:51
seriously!. i have no idea what you guys are complaining about. i get that were all fans, but if you watch the shows night after night hour after hour your gonna get bored.
shit any more than 20-30 mins, 2-3 times a week and i get bored. even with pervcams.
to me, its not meant to be all night entertainment. its an advert for phonesex, not a 9 hour stripathon.
yet i see day after day the same complaints.
crap sets, boring poses, bored girls.
NO SHIT! there bored and boring. 9 hours of answering a phone is mind numbing and some girls are doing it 2-3-4 times a week.
you think your bored?.
if you want some entertainment to go in the backround while you do stuff
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzQUP1qoWDoEbmsQxvdjxgQ check this out, the joe rogan podacst. (he doesnt just talk MMA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyulytSaZqY&list=PL0979520796B02D2C or the PKA podcast featuring (kyle)FPS russia, woodysgamertag and murkadurkah.
each podcast is 2-4 hours long and perfect for when your doing other shit.
for me its worked wonders, i dont watch the shows as much and as a result im way less critical of them. maybe it will work the same way for you guys.
even if it doesnt the above are worth a look for there entertainment value.
seriously guys if your that bored looking at a pretty girl with her tits out, its time to go do something else....
(just sayin.
)OH AND 420 blaze it
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - skully - 31-08-2016 14:13
I agree. At this point, what I used to record in one or two nights would probably take around a month.
It's not a slight on the girls, it's just that the shows and their overall output have changed, less channels, tighter rules etc.
The perv cam has both added to, and taken away from performances, but that's to be expected, some of the girls aren't into it, some are, others shouldn't be let near it...and the channels shouldn't be sticking it on every set with every girl expecting something
As for Clare specifically, she's a bit like Lilly Roma, she goes for seductive rather than bouncing around the joint. Sure it can be a little repetitive, but that's her style of show and it does work, head to toe gorgeousness...likes being naked...and uses the perv cam...
I'm with HEX!T, watch a little less, enjoy it a little more. Be a little bit Batman...wait, what...
