+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 21-06-2017 21:40
Quote:In the eyes of OFCOM, we were a telemarketing channel because we were, effectively, selling something. The word ‘porn’ wasn’t used in the studio as not everyone sees a sexy woman in lingerie gyrating on cheap furniture as porn. You can put as many regulations on as you like, but at the end of the day it was very explicit, sexualised and erotic.
The producers, cameramen & presenter should always be trying to be as "explicit, sexualised & erotic" as possible to increase their ability to sell something.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - FanofCamilla - 21-06-2017 22:28
(21-06-2017 18:35 )babelover48 Wrote: I wonder what it would be like on the phones if the shoe was on the other foot so to speak?......
This did happen, on sky, some channel in the 940's had guys on it, that you could phone, not sure how long it lasted, only a matter of weeks, maybe months.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 22-06-2017 03:04
(21-06-2017 22:28 )FanofCamilla Wrote:(21-06-2017 18:35 )babelover48 Wrote: I wonder what it would be like on the phones if the shoe was on the other foot so to speak?.....
This did happen, on sky, some channel in the 940's had guys on it, that you could phone, not sure how long it lasted, only a matter of weeks, maybe months.
Yes, it seemed to be aimed at the gay market more than women callers.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 22-06-2017 06:30
I wonder how OFCOM dealt with the complaints if there were any...
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - elgar1uk - 22-06-2017 11:24
There have been at least two gay channels on Sky, that I can remember. They weren't around for very long though.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 30-06-2017 11:42
Best night across all the channels in ages in my opinion. With so many fave babes on, it was difficult to know where to look.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 30-06-2017 21:20
WOW the shows don't seem to have a youth policy.. Tonight I make the average age is around 35+
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 30-06-2017 22:30
(30-06-2017 21:20 )Charlemagne Wrote: WOW the shows don't seem to have a youth policy.. Tonight I make the average age is around 35+In some cases age is just a number, Dannii and Dionne look good for their respective ages imo
plus the older women and the boring girls have the best call stats and there's a mix of those on tonight
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 30-06-2017 22:52
(30-06-2017 21:20 )Charlemagne Wrote: WOW the shows don't seem to have a youth policy.. Tonight I make the average age is around 35+
age is only a number
doesn't bother me there are a few older babes on tonight
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 03-07-2017 17:14
Apologies for pulling the following to the main thread but I didn't want my general comments to seem like they were targeting any individual babe or poster...
(03-07-2017 05:34 )southlondonphil Wrote: ... I'm sure Tori's plenty attractive enough. In terms of looks she's as good as anyone on Studio 66. I don't think she's the most natural girl on the phones though. Some girls are probably better at cultivating regular callers, which can really bump their call figures up.
^ This. Exactly... The part I've bolded is the sort of observation that deserves to be stickied here (if we did that kind of thing
) IMO.Mainstream attractiveness and energetic skin-filled performances don't ALWAYS equal loads of calls quite evidently. There is a whole other side to a successful babes standing that barely gets a mention on here in relative terms compared to reams and reams of guys assessing the visuals (Ive been as guilty as any of this in the past btw).
Quite obviously, a hot night girl MUST carry her apparent visual horniness over into her conversation. She has to hold and seduce her callers and listeners alike. She has to cultivate her crowd with an engaging and enticing expression of aspects of her personality. She has to be able to heighten the sexual side of herself in the right way, on demand, and put that over effectively enough to build calls night after night, when, by rights, the repetition should be having a deadening effect. She'll hopefully be able to use language (dirty and clean) in an evocative and varied way. The best babes will then tailor the caller experience to feedback (if any) from the particular guy - working to his desires and individualising the call to garner even greater customer satisfaction. Like any good conversationalist that part is about good listening skills - an essential component of a charismatic personality. Guys can then be charmed back as well as drained sexually.
Without these things in her locker even the most stunning and commited performer may well struggle on the shows.
But we consistently miss speaking of this here. And ignoring these aspects of a babe's job completely will leave the casual observer struggling to understand the apparent success and ubiquitous scheduling of certain proponents...
This is actually part of the disconnect between the babes and their general viewing audience that is often bemoaned round these parts. Yes, it is quite obvious that large sections of the industry hold this forum and its 'fans' in contempt. But just one small reason for that is the lack of perception exhibited for how the babes work on shows; primarly in a lack of acknowledgement of who they are actually working to satisfy. In this and in how the forum under-expresses its appreciation for their communication skills, I think the insiders have a valid point.
The forum simply does not discuss these aspects enough. A visable awareness of them is sorely lacking in many, many, comments on here. The explanation for the former may well be immediately obvious. The latter is less excusable. An expanded perspective is everything in any criticism. Even that of a wank channel.