I wish they wouldn't insult my intelligence - PersonaNonGrata - 08-01-2010 19:16
Why oh why don't they credit us with at least an ounce of intelligence? Last night, Lolly introduced a 2 for 1 set, and told us that Megan and Lori were girlfriends in real life.... and it just so happened that they wanted you (a man) sandwiched in between them!
If they were really lovers, why would they want me around? And why did Megan insist she keep her knickers on - not just her but Lori too?
RE: I wish they wouldn't insult my intelligence - tony confederate - 08-01-2010 21:04
(08-01-2010 19:16 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Why oh why don't they credit us with at least an ounce of intelligence? Last night, Lolly introduced a 2 for 1 set, and told us that Megan and Lori were girlfriends in real life....
It's a fantasy service.
(08-01-2010 19:16 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: If they were really lovers, why would they want me around?
Because they are kinky.
RE: I wish they wouldn't insult my intelligence - TheWatcher - 08-01-2010 22:04
(08-01-2010 19:16 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Why oh why don't they credit us with at least an ounce of intelligence? Last night, Lolly introduced a 2 for 1 set, and told us that Megan and Lori were girlfriends in real life.... and it just so happened that they wanted you (a man) sandwiched in between them!
If they were really lovers, why would they want me around? And why did Megan insist she keep her knickers on - not just her but Lori too?
For the other mods only
Lori is Mr Megan
RE: I wish they wouldn't insult my intelligence - PersonaNonGrata - 09-01-2010 03:26
(08-01-2010 22:04 )TheWatcher Wrote: Lori is Mr Megan
Of course, silly me!
Actresses (and models) always go by their maiden name, don't they!
RE: I wish they wouldn't insult my intelligence - elgar1uk - 09-01-2010 17:48
(08-01-2010 19:16 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Why oh why don't they credit us with at least an ounce of intelligence? Last night, Lolly introduced a 2 for 1 set, and told us that Megan and Lori were girlfriends in real life
And you're taking Lolly's announcements as though they are intended to be stating facts are you? I'm sure it never occurred to Lolly that her announcements would be taken that seriously.
As tony confederate said, it's a fantasy service.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - dave34 - 10-01-2010 21:30
hi guys do you no when Camilla is back on screen.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - matt38 - 13-01-2010 20:56
Simply question do you think Daryll will follow Alex back to Bangbabes, me personally, I hope not, BB is even worse a show then what Partyland is.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - dave34 - 13-01-2010 21:39
no i think Daryll will stay on babestation as i like seeing here with both candys & the rest of the girls jest need to see her take everything off now jest like miss fox dose .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - cdm79 - 13-01-2010 21:52
(13-01-2010 20:56 )matt38 Wrote: Simply question do you think Daryll will follow Alex back to Bangbabes, me personally, I hope not, BB is even worse a show then what Partyland is.
I don't think Daryl will leave BS, her presenting skills would be wasted on BangBabes. I was never a big fan of Alex, but she made a great double act with Daryl when on BS:Xtra together. It's a shame that partnership has been broken up.
In regards to Daryl going naked, don't think it'll happen. She said on Xtra once that she'll never go nude, in case of 'accidents'. Still, never say never
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Big Boobies - 13-01-2010 21:57
I In regards to Daryl going naked, don't think it'll happen. She said on Xtra once that she'll never go nude, in case of 'accidents'. Still, never say never
[/quote]
I do love DARYL;its a boob thing! And yes a naked DARYL would be GREAT! But we better dream on I think!
|