+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Other Adult Websites (/forumdisplay.php?fid=194)
+--- Forum: Personal Fan Sites (/forumdisplay.php?fid=395)
+--- Thread: OnlyFans (/showthread.php?tid=69991)
RE: OnlyFans - gazcraw77 - 02-08-2022 11:43
Just reverted back to blue logo for me today
RE: OnlyFans - lovebabes56 - 04-08-2022 11:31
Wonder what prompted the change?
RE: OnlyFans - padzer1 - 06-08-2022 08:51
Was subscribed to Charlie Rose, very little content unless you spend £40 odd quid a day. Madness. Find more explicit stuff of her on Google. I wouldn’t recommend at all
RE: OnlyFans - dirtytommy - 27-08-2022 10:09
with the energy crisis looming ever larger, I have cancelled all my onlyfans. I imagine a big drop off in revenue.
RE: OnlyFans - gazcraw77 - 27-08-2022 11:43
(27-08-2022 10:09 )dirtytommy Wrote: with the energy crisis looming ever larger, I have cancelled all my onlyfans. I imagine a big drop off in revenue.
I have cut back on a lot of subscriptions (non only fans) and OF may be next for me too
Surprising what they all add up too monthly
RE: OnlyFans - gazcraw77 - 08-09-2022 11:03
Anyone took up Emma C’s 65% off offer? Keep saying I won’t go back as it’s not the naughtiest OF about just T&A (But I’m a sucker for Emma at times ha ha) Was hoping with no S66 to distract her, the naughty levels will have gone up
a few notches (always found her to be more naughty/filthy at work than on OF)
RE: OnlyFans - gazcraw77 - 08-09-2022 17:36
Georgie Darby has a link on her Twitter for a free trial Subscription to her OF that lasts 1 year
RE: OnlyFans - Fridge13 - 13-10-2022 20:58
Ashlyns new onlysfans is live....so far so good
RE: OnlyFans - flash harry - 18-11-2022 18:20
Can someone tell me what is considered to be the main attraction of OnlyFans, as to me the content seems largely not at the same level as mainstream porn and therefore not the same value for money. I've heard some girls say that they provide a kind of personal connection that some people are looking for, which I understand, but do people think they have a personal connection with someone on their OnlyFans that is better than they would get just by camming with them?
RE: OnlyFans - FanofCamilla - 19-11-2022 11:32
For some girls, its the only way to see them i.e. they don't (or rarely cam) and aren't on the channels anymore.
It's probably cheaper then camming and offers more content. $10 a month could get you hundreds of photos & videos, and camming could be $5 a minute, and whilst it might be more personal, it doesn't last long.