+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 30-07-2017 01:07
^ Yep, for some time now (but particularly since the arrival of pervcam*
), it's been the full-on, 'pay to see anything' attitude that, by and large, has been the pervasive one amongst the broadcasters. 
Recently, I dug out a few recordings of old shows, and the ones that first came to hand were from 2014 & 15, so well beyond the glory years, and in absolute terms 'not that great', but, it's amazing (and somewhat depressing) to see how much better they are compared to April 2016* onwards.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 02-08-2017 00:35
You can always tell when things are particularly dire on the channels, as 'we' have to find other sources of entertainment, such as the recent postings in both the S66 and, in particular, Lametstation chat threads.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 02-08-2017 00:36
I have resorted to watching the tennis instead
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 02-08-2017 00:42
Perhaps they're taking things easy, saving their energy, prior to the 'move'
today on FV? 
I'm expecting nothing less than full-on, hardcore filth when they 'return' in their new postions.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 02-08-2017 00:46
(02-08-2017 00:42 )Censorship :-( Wrote: Perhaps they're taking things easy, saving their energy, prior to the 'move'
I'm expecting nothing less than full-on, hardcore filth when they 'return' in their new postions.
Your wish may be granted but most likely behind a curtain
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 02-08-2017 01:24
(30-07-2017 00:55 )snookered147 Wrote: ^ Agreed.
The lack of imagination is just depressing. All ruthless money grabbing now unfortunately
On the new sets point, you're probably right. But we raised this issue before and you said there was little point asking for it, because it won't happen.
There's not a lack of imagination on all the channels. Are you saying you're not a fan of BS' roaming cams? Wasn't camera movement something you were crying out for in Studio 66's thread? Well BS are doing that.
The roaming cams aren't just limited to listen in lines either. I just don't agree it's all bad, across all the channels.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 02-08-2017 06:37
SO many of BS recent changes have been done more for their benefit than to enhance the quality of visual stimulation on offer to traditional callers, so yes the provision of new sets and the use of roving cameras are to be welcomed.
BUT it is the implementation once that we get to the latter and the use of the new sets that is still lacking at BS for me. The 'action' on the regular streams is all so perfunctory these days. That is the real lack of imagination that snooks is refering to. Where is the drive, the expression of passion (it was there from Alice, Ashley and Nicole, to name just three, last year); where is any sense of heat created? The answer is it is now being reserved firmly for elsewhere.
I find it incredible that callers can be getting off to anything but the babe's words on the regular BS channels now. Don't expect them to make much use of the TV is all.
Part of this is because the caller is now being targeted in a different way of course. He is now expected to dip into his pocket once more in order to get the fuller experience. To enhance that draw the original product has now been whittled away to virtually nothing.
Where once our TV screens became part of what was being sold to the caller now your box in the corner is only needed to announce that each babe is there and available (hence the arrival of the dreaded curtain to the main channels). The real deal is now confined to webcams - where sharp practices make up for less than sharp images.
The curtain and this general stance will only pervade further from here I fear. The only things bigger about BS from here on being its haberdashery budget and the number of babes that we'll see in DBS. And the only things naughtier wont be anywhere near your TV screens.
The VFM aspect of the channels has decreased HUGELY over the last couple of years. It has been done with little subtlety or stealth and yet guys are still propping up the house of cards. If it ends it's hard to see it not ending badly atm. Enough guys may remain duped however.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 02-08-2017 09:24
Yes Shandyhand I concur.
Will post a fuller reply later when I return from work
.Edit: Constructing my reply now but it will take a while
.Could be 3 or 4 hours in the making
.Might bore myself silly at this rate
.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 02-08-2017 10:53
Shandyhand I'm going to reply to some of your points in stages, so I'll try and set it out in a similarly eloquent format to how you have.
There was a thread created on this forum for people to post ideas for new sets on Babestation. A viewer's wishlist if you like, where people had the opportunity to express what they felt was lacking in the current studios and to suggest an improvement that would increase interest in the channel. A number of people made very good suggestions in that thread. I still agree that the current studio sets on BS are tired and need an upgrade. I just find it strange that people are saying this now when the same people were saying in that thread there's no point asking for them because it won't happen.
Well perhaps, just perhaps, BS producers saw the comments about it having no chance to happen and thought "stuff it - we were considering things but now if any changes are unwelcome we won't bother." It's just a possible thought process that the show's people can have after reading negative comments. People are entitled to say those things of course, I've got no problem with people expressing a view. Remember though that the show's bosses could also have a view that changes their mind about possible upgrades.
Now, the examples you've raised re: the drive from Alice, Nicole and Ashley. I'll say in response that Alice and Nicole still have the drive. A number of people have commented on Alice's roaming POVs and Nicole's recent shower set. I think that both Alice and Nicole have had exceptional years so far, as much as the current surroundings will allow. For me they are two girls who still push themselves to deliver a performance. This is all from a viewer's only point of view, I accept I cannot afford to spend money on calls.
Ashley on the other hand I agree with you that she has lost a drive. In fact I'd even suggest she never really had it in the first place. When you consider that she still has not done one front facing, naked, roaming cam, POV set and certainly no shower. She may have done some of that behind that stupid curtain on the web but of course we'll never know. She looks amazing naked, great. But her performances are tame. Alice, Nicole, Dannii, Sophie, the twins, even Penny last night - they continue to at least try to perform.
I've enjoyed BS' shows more than Studio 66. I think that there are far more intrusive and frequent DBS on S66 than BS. I think that girls have more opportunities for invention, imagination and to try to provide value for money than their S66 counterparts. Which is why I made my original post about not thinking it's poor across all channels. I think S66 have great performers but feel they are shackled by frustrating policies a lot more than BS performers are.
Granted there have been many changes in all the channels policies since they began ten years ago. I'm not sure with current regulations that any of that golden age can come back. So I do get members' frustration considering how good and innovative the channels used to be. I just think, and hope, that the house of cards you've mentioned isn't ready to fall yet. Otherwise what else would we talk about?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 02-08-2017 17:56
The name of the game now is:
Push the punter to Call and Pervecam simultaneously.
Doubles the revenue per wank. Make the TV feed purely advertising for the "show".