+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=42986)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - REX MASTER - 29-09-2016 22:17
Sexy Ms Clare Richards Naked And Dripping Wet In The Shower!!
What More Does A Guy Needs!!!
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 29-09-2016 22:18
Boring lazy ol' Clare again
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 29-09-2016 22:23
The nightshow Gods have heard my prayers at last.
Clare gets in the shower - tick.
I ring up and get straight through
- tick.She gets naked for me - tick.
Lathers herself up - tick.
Filthy chat - tick
Variety of pose - tick.
Enjoyment - tick.
.Nuff said
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-09-2016 22:24
(29-09-2016 22:18 )KerrAvon Wrote: Boring lazy ol' Clare again
yeah I know, get her off nights immediately
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 29-09-2016 22:25
Cameraman is being a pussy.
Wish they'd let the Studio 66 women to hand thong and finger thong like is allowed at Babestation.
Never thought I'd see the day when Ashely Emma and Alice Goodwin are showing much more than Clare.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - A-Rod - 29-09-2016 22:28
Should we feel guilty for wanting change & now we've got it ?(one off or not) I don't think so...
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - greenray - 29-09-2016 22:29
Good work,Snookered!
Apart from that,I'm pretty much lost for words
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 29-09-2016 22:32
This is why we ask for change - because we know that this lady can deliver this kind of show. Probably like no-one else can.
I said before that she set her own standard, she sets the bar the highest, and we demand that she meets her own standards because she is capable of what we're seeing tonight. The kind of show that annihilates all of the competition in record time. This is the quality of show we want from Clare all the time.
Credit where it's due, we asked for change, we got change and about bloomin' time too. Nice one Clare.
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - A-Rod - 29-09-2016 22:34
(29-09-2016 22:32 )Regenerated Wrote: This is why we ask for change - because we know that this lady can deliver this kind of show. Probably like no-one else can.
I said before that she set her own standard, she sets the bar the highest, and we demand that she meets her own standards because she is capable of what we're seeing tonight. The kind of show that annihilates all of the competition in record time. This is the quality of show we want from Clare all the time.
Credit where it's due, we asked for change, we got change and about bloomin' time too. Nice one Clare.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/7rj2ZgttvgomY/giphy.gif)
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 29-09-2016 22:36
The good thing here is that the shower has actually been used well as a prop both on its holder and in the hand held position too. Bit of lathering up earlier too.
Always maximise the space, the set and the props within to give the stint a bit more edge.
Clare has accomplished this well so far.
The white top and panties was a great starting outfit, the striptease was great too. An object lesson in how to use a set properly. I have always said imo the set is crucial.
A quality set, quality nightshow babe performing like she can.
It is the perfect blend but alas it is not pursued anywhere near enough by any of the channels.