The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 09-10-2017 19:01

(09-10-2017 18:29 )HEX!T Wrote:  gonna change the topic here...

last night clare was cool as fuck but at about 2am her calls dried up and she left soon after...
ive noticed it happen more and more since the beginning of the year...
oddly it seemed to start when they blocked the freeloaders on the pervcams...

now i know they will never make the cams free. but maybe they can do the dual cam feed thing again. this time show what the guys wanna see... maybe give it a trial run for a couple of shifts with random girls and see if they start getting calls when traditionally the lines go quiet for s66. (web only of course)

normally i wouldnt even consider this but when your more popular girls aint bringing in calls with a normal show, then maybe its time to switch things up.

Think in this instance Clare leaving around 2am has nothing to do with blocking freeloaders on pervcam. S66 went off air with technical problems around 1:30am which obviously would cause the amount of calls to dry up to virtually zero so Clare either was allowed to go home early or s66 sent her home


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 09-10-2017 19:13

probably, but if you look back over the last few months every shift from 2am has been dry for her.
if she was still bringing in calls from the web viewers she wouldnt have had to be sent or leave early...
and i wasnt just referring to s66 this is the general babeshows section not the s66 section Smile


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 09-10-2017 19:23

(09-10-2017 19:13 )HEX!T Wrote:  probably, but if you look back over the last few months every shift from 2am has been dry for her.
if she was still bringing in calls from the web viewers she wouldnt have had to be sent or leave early...
and i wasnt just referring to s66 this is the general babeshows section not the s66 section Smile

Yes I know this is the general babeshows section. You specifically mentioned s66 & Clare in your post so I said why in this case Clare finished/left early


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 09-10-2017 20:40

(09-10-2017 12:35 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  The current state is a direct result of the 'pay or you'll see little/nothing' business model that has now been adopted by the channels, Lamestation in particular. Sad

The broadcasters had their chance to challenge Ofcom censorship, but, instead, meekly accepted it at every turn; The 'ship' that was the good old 'Ofcom's to blame' excuse, sailed a long time ago, I feel. Sad

True, but I think the loss of proper DBS was a huge loss. This tool created loads of potential variation to mix things up and yet still use the same girls. Some of the best shows I've ever seen have been random pairings that went off like dynamite! This also freed up space for the use of extra girls on other channels.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 09-10-2017 21:28

^ Been wondering about this again today as BScams are, once again, trying to convince the populous that they are ready (no REALLY this time - no foolin' Wink ) to unleash some proper lesbo action upon us from the recognised names.

Punters seem pretty damn sceptical of the latter events - with good reason if some accounts of the recently attempted 4way are to be believed...

So just why is it that this stuff seems to have to be so weak (or faked) of late - even when taking place on the encrypted streams? But then it is remarkable to me how long it seems to have taken the channels to get back to these multi-babe sessions when you'd think it's such a painfully obvious way of exploiting the unregulated webstreams once set up to do so. (Even now, only BS are taking even these faltering baby steps back into this arena. Why are the others still so wary?)

Is it perhaps that the babe's contracts no longer include these kind of babe interactions as a rule (as for a long time they had not been required)? Or is it that the babes have fallen out of the '241' habit and such programming is looked upon more gingerly than once the case in babeland? Is it even that there are doubts around exactly what (or not) is being consented to in any given session in these more stringent days? (Wasn't there a post recently of a caller overhearing a producer calling out something along the lines of "Remember to ask if it's okay" with every new move of interaction between two babes?)

Whatever the issues, the seeming reluctance of babes and scepticism of fans needs to be got through because on this one. As bw implies, these types of session should be a mainstay of any babe format that they can be part of.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Mr.E Nygma - 09-10-2017 21:35

Today has shown me that any potential zombie apocalypse survival kits now need not only a stockpile of tinned goods, bottled water and the such like but also a stockpile of prerecorded babeshows. Those of us who were Ill prepared for this potential outcome should treat today as a drill and make the necessary arrangements should we lose contact like this again!


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 09-10-2017 21:40

lol. i just watch a movie instead...
baby driver is pretty good for killing an hour or 2


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - tjl007 - 09-10-2017 21:54

Well studio 66 has rebecca more rubbing her pussy and lola knight flashing the gash


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 09-10-2017 22:17

^ They should be 'not on TV' more often! eek Rolleyes


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 10-10-2017 17:40

Recent technical issues will hopefully lead to all the channels providing web-only content on a similar level to what Rebecca More and Lola Knight put on show last night for S66.

It's the exact type of show that everyone on here has been screaming for them to make for years.

If the channels continue to ignore our opinions, and hide shows behind curtains, squeeze two presenters onto cramped sets or create magazines then I hope they all go bankrupt.

But what do I know, I'm just a "freeloader" that doesn't want to pay for watered down OFCOM rubbish and would prefer to spend it on awesome topless days, fully nude nights and 2-4-1 shows that have good sound and picture quality.