Escorting - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Other Adult Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=159) +--- Forum: Adult Clubs & Services (/forumdisplay.php?fid=163) +--- Thread: Escorting (/showthread.php?tid=7768) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 |
RE: Escorting - maxwelljam - 12-02-2016 08:06 (11-02-2016 20:04 )jayz1876 Wrote: Obviously you won't post names on the forum!? Perhaps we should re-evaluate the purpose of this thread in that case!? LOL. Buddy by all means feel free to DM, there are some high quality guys here who are all well aware of what you are talking about, we know photogirls and its erstwhile sister sites to be legit, we have deep knowledge of UTR girls, we know that a grand will usually go a long way and we know with whom and we know for what; we are familiar with Lourdes in the US, we have whatsapp threads on our phones full of convos with glamour models about dos/don'ts/price/availability - you are amongst friends here and we are in the habit of sharing, discreetly or otherwise. Please do not think that we don't or won't like what you say, because you're actually preaching to the choir fella. Moreover, I think we are all agreed that it is extremely frustrating to be rebuffed by a girl on her high horse who we all know is P4P. So brother don't be scared to hit us up. I am sure that we can all learn some invaluable information from each other. Disagree with you there, the purpose is not to out the individual activities of ladies who don't want their extra curricula activities publicly advertised. That's no different to the private ticket tout selling tickets on behalf of Twickenham debenture holders who doesn't advertise his services simply because he doesn't have to - the principle is the same, let people get on with their affairs/business without being interrupted by others tire kickers /public embarrassment or the law. I'm not preaching to you or anyone else, many on these boards like to believe their favourite girls wouldn't consider escorting, some of whom have even claimed to be . I have no wish to offend such persons hence the "you might not like it". You want names, it's so easy to work out it's untrue. I'm sure a lot of you guys do know the right people but many here don't seem to know where to start. All it takes is a little research and credibility that you have the money to those with the right access. RE: Escorting - maxwelljam - 12-02-2016 08:11 (11-02-2016 23:51 )hairbald Wrote: To pick up on a couple of points raised by Maxwelljam and Florida. Photogirls has always had a tendency for bait and switch based on their webpages. Frankly, you have to take a risk and dish out a chunky "consultancy" fee after having a track record with them. You'd be right that I haven't spoken to them for some time. Others I know have, they haven't been disappointed. The main lead out here (Middle East) is clubillrepute. Again, costly. RE: Escorting - maxwelljam - 12-02-2016 08:16 (11-02-2016 19:34 )hairbald Wrote: Sadly the "won't turn down a grand" seems to have gone up to one and a half grand if recent experiences are anything to go by. This is meant to be recession? To be fair, with the exception of one or two, the BS girls seem to be at the lower end of the pay scale... No idea if that's down to regional variances. The competition out here is a fair bit higher and few would care if a girl has been on a UK adult chat show. More "regular" TV girls are at the prices you're talking about. RE: Escorting - jayz1876 - 12-02-2016 19:48 maxwelljam I hear you, hence my DM suggestion... I would hope the aim is not to stage a pissing contest of who can brag about being deepest into this world. The one man on this forum who absolutely is deepest in is a hands-off ghost and I commend him for his approach. For us more active members though, surely the purpose is to share our knowledge, not to come on and say I've fucked x, y and z so in your face cause I'm just straight-up grandstanding and not even gonna tell you how. So, to be clear, I am on your wavelength and yes it is the prevailing sentiment that we keep UTRs UTR... but in reality I don't like it. I am of the Hooman Karamian mindset - we should be free to talk about all these girls however and wherever we wish. This concept of the UTR verges on unjustifiable really and it is an increasingly untenable concept as far as I am concerned. Prima facie your ticket tout analogy is valid, but with a little thought, the comparison is superficial and doesn't really ring true to my mind, brother. Nevertheless, whilst on the face of it I am an abrasive personality on these boards, I am not so much of a disruptor as to wish to lose the crowd entirely, hence my revelations remain confined to private conversation with the many great individuals on this site and they will continue to be so. I put this to you all though - isn't it a tad beta for us to be in thrall to these girls to the extent that we are entirely compliant enablers in the sham of not talking about certain members of their community simply by virtue of the fact that these anointed ones present as being of an "elite" standard? Do we do the more easy going girls a disservice by being complicit in perpetuating the questionable UTR/non-UTR dichotomy? Just matters to ponder for the more cerebral amongst us. To you hairbald I would say yes indeed I need to clarify re: photogirls - I have known it historically to be legit and I have also known it to be sketchy as fuark - hopefully that clears up my meaning - the most recent points of maxwelljam, yourself and myself are on all fours, I am glad to say. As for the post directly above, it is with much interest I note the wording of what you have said maxwelljam and accordingly I would be intrigued to have some private back and forth with you on this subject, if you would be minded to do so. I remain hard lovin', straight thuggin', RE: Escorting - maxwelljam - 13-02-2016 13:05 Feel free to DM. RE: Escorting - mrmann - 13-02-2016 14:19 DM? Drivate Message? What does everyone think about Hamiltons? Better than Photogirls and UK Glamour Girls? RE: Escorting - jayz1876 - 13-02-2016 14:34 (13-02-2016 14:19 )mrmann Wrote: DM? Direct Message mrmann, just a synonym for Private Message. Hamilton's probably in or about a similar standard. Obvs only referring to photogirls being of a decent standard when they come through with the talent they purport to have. Anyone know anything about Hannah Prentice btw? Fake tits, fake ass, highly desirable. RE: Escorting - Jay1 - 13-02-2016 21:22 Am I right in thinking that Holly Hixton on Photogirls is Holly Gibbons? Anybody met her through them? RE: Escorting - sedsa - 13-02-2016 21:54 I don't think it is her as that profile had different pics until now. https://twitter.com/photogirlsxxx/status/481077093997248512/photo/1 The other pics are clearly not Holly Gibbons, so either the last lot were wrong or it's bait and switch. The only thing that "may" mean it's her now is that the pics are not blurred. I was under the impression (Generally at any rate) that if pics are not blurred, it';s genuine and if they are it's fake on photogirls. It could be Holly GIbbons, but I would be surprised to be honest. (13-02-2016 21:22 )Jay1 Wrote: Am I right in thinking that Holly Hixton on Photogirls is Holly Gibbons? Anybody met her through them? RE: Escorting - Jay1 - 13-02-2016 22:01 (13-02-2016 21:54 )sedsa Wrote: I don't think it is her as that profile had different pics until now. https://twitter.com/photogirlsxxx/status/481077093997248512/photo/1 Thanks for the heads up and info. I have noticed that 'Della's' (Adele Stephens) photos are now completely 'unblurred' but as you say, the two photos of Holly are obviously completely different girls. |