The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 20-07-2018 11:19

Raising the age of when a presenter can join a channel should be raised to 21 though.

Because a lot of girls in their early teens have been encouraged by older men to start glamour modelling way before they're 18.

I fear that many have been financially and sexually exploited by men in the industry, and then struggle for work once they leave.

Women should be encouraged to pass down their business acumen and professionalism to young girls.


RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 20-07-2018 11:19

(20-07-2018 08:52 )The Realist Wrote:  The case in point is Chloe, IMO she was pushed into removing her panties evident in the way she used her hand to cover her embarrassment when obviously forcefully requested to do the POV fully naked a week or so ago, she hasn't had much TV work since and not performed anything other than glamour, which of course these girls are, just glamour models.

Lol don't worry about Chloe mate she's not a shy girl at all,
If you had ever watched her on pervecam u would know she's happy to take her panties off, spread her legs and put big toys in her pussy for us to watch and enjoy,
She's definitely not embarrassed as happy to do such shows in the regular studio where crew and other girls can see why she's doing,
It's the reason she doesn't get much TV as she's very popular on pervecam as people know how far she's happy to go, that's why she's on the webshow a lot it's just where she's making good money for bs its not some sort of punishment for not getting naked on TV,
I really think u have over though this lol


RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 20-07-2018 11:37

(20-07-2018 11:19 )winsaw Wrote:  
(20-07-2018 08:52 )The Realist Wrote:  The case in point is Chloe, IMO she was pushed into removing her panties evident in the way she used her hand to cover her embarrassment when obviously forcefully requested to do the POV fully naked a week or so ago, she hasn't had much TV work since and not performed anything other than glamour, which of course these girls are, just glamour models.

Lol don't worry about Chloe mate she's not a shy girl at all,
If you had ever watched her on pervecam u would know she's happy to take her panties off, spread her legs and put big toys in her pussy for us to watch and enjoy,
She's definitely not embarrassed as happy to do such shows in the regular studio where crew and other girls can see why she's doing,
It's the reason she doesn't get much TV as she's very popular on pervecam as people know how far she's happy to go, that's why she's on the webshow a lot it's just where she's making good money for bs its not some sort of punishment for not getting naked on TV,
I really think u have over though this lol

Look what you've done now. winsaw. You'll only encourage him onto Chloe's pervcam now, where he can be even more 'concerned' for her now Big Laugh


RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-07-2018 11:38

Babestation & the other babeshows are geared towards getting as much cash as possible out of viewers??!! Well no s**t Sherlock. Talk about stating the blooming obvious Big Grin

Also I refuse to accept or believe babeshow babes are being pushed, forced/pushed exploited to do things that they aren’t comfortable with & are not being exploited by men.

Women work on the shows of their own free will, it’s their choice and also they will only do things on the shows that they are comfortable with & refuse to do things that they aren’t. Plus keep the age at 18 to work on the shows, why should it be raised just for the shows when it’s 18 to do p3 etc & porn

Agree with winsaw really have over thought things here.

The forum always seem to get one of these “I’m concerned for the babeshow babes” forum member on a regular basislaughlaugh


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 20-07-2018 11:45

espexcially thegirlsion St66 doing those blogs that they used to do, they were fun to watch, at least you know stufs that they didn't mention on twitter


RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Realist - 20-07-2018 12:02

Well - I have certainly stirred up this debate, it is intriguing all the points of view, personally these shows do nothing for me, I have just seen so many who have been damaged by the sex industry and some sadly no longer with us, I have always been hands on in my personal life just hearing someone heavy breathing down the phone leaves me cold, I don't get the attraction.
When you watch the body language of the performers talking to punters they are so disinterested and the speel is that of an automaton. Priya, Alice and another girl who's name I cannot recall spend more time chatting to the crew than performing and when they do they are still taking to the crew. As said here concerns for the younger models seem to be misplaced, I never pay out or wasted my cash on the so called services provided so I have never seen anyone in private viewing or what you call "perv cam".
I will continue watching on and off if only for a good giggle at the false, fake fabrication of this output.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-07-2018 12:13

(20-07-2018 12:02 )The Realist Wrote:  personally these shows do nothing for me

So why have you joined a babeshow forum if the shows do nothing for you and have seemingly never spent money on them BounceBounceBounce


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 22-07-2018 14:53

conformation that the decent people from rlc who where screwed as much as the girls are behind this new studio, be interesting to see just what they do, and explains why Kellie is not on tv even though she had offers i guess,

[Image: rlc_3699.jpg]


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 22-07-2018 20:33

Web based only I assume


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 24-07-2018 00:21

^^ Yeah probably web based only.

Pretty bad, tame night so far on the channels. When are Ashley Emma and Alice back again?
Rolleyes