The UK Babe Channels Forum
Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 05-01-2012 23:11

Lovers Guide Extended now on Sky 275 Body In Balance, couples oiling each other, watching each other masturbate, masturbating each other with clear genital contact. Im so shocked I may have to watch the whole show.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 05-01-2012 23:19

Fuck aye this is more explicit that what you would see on a subscription porn channel, must be for educational purpose's, anyway I'm not complaining, just got a full glimpse of the pussy being licked out, now I'm watching a fully uncensored blowjob Tongue

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - terence - 05-01-2012 23:22

(05-01-2012 23:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Fuck aye this is more explicit that what you would see on a subscription porn channel, must be for educational purpose's, anyway I'm not complaining, just got a full glimpse of the pussy being licked out, now I'm watching a fully uncensored blowjob Tongue

did i spy mckenzie lee?

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - dazaman - 06-01-2012 00:24

(05-01-2012 23:11 )eccles Wrote:  Lovers Guide Extended now on Sky 275 Body In Balance, couples oiling each other, watching each other masturbate, masturbating each other with clear genital contact. Im so shocked I may have to watch the whole show.

Just download the last 8 minutes Big Grin

90.71MB http://www.cum.com/?d=IZTIAZN9

[Image: a83e8b168218212.jpg]

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 06-01-2012 02:04

Nice one Daz!

Very erotic and a definite turn on that was!

So it's OK to watch uncensored programs on how to arouse someone including yourself, yet we can't see a vaginal on adult channels that are designed to arouse bladewave

Loved the part where the woman sat her vagina on the guy's mouth!!! The babe channels should take note Smile Would love to see Dr. Rebecca on Elite!

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 06-01-2012 03:09

(06-01-2012 00:24 )dazaman Wrote:  Just download the last 8 minutes Big Grin

90.71MB http://www.cum.com/?d=IZTIAZN9

Got the shock of my life watching that cos I thought the girl at 03:05 was Donna.

Anyway, Ofcom's view of stuff like this makes me fucking laugh... claiming it's okay because it's educational and not intended to arouse. That's true enough for those of us who have reached a certain age and had their fill of all manner of pornography, but in actual fact it's perfect wanking material for the very people Ofcom claim to be protecting, namely the young teens.

However you dress this shit up, it's pornography - plain and simple. They even use porn stars to do the sex scenes, for fuck's sake!!

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Digital Dave - 06-01-2012 12:18

I wonder what would happen if a babe channel got the rights to a sex education series such as Lovers' Guide, and broadcast it uncensored?

We'd then have full hardcore sex FTA in the 900s. The defence would be, as usual, 'it's educational, guv'.

How would Ofcom react? Would their contradictory policies eventually eat each other and implode? How could they sanction the babe channel in question when they allow the same content to be broadcast uncensored elsewhere?

This might be a very simple, cost effective and useful exercise for a babe channel to carry out in order to challenge Ofcom.

Eccles?

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 08-01-2012 02:48

Well the babeshow channels are registered as Teleshopping, and under Teleshopping rules they are banned from having editorial control. A mainstream channel was caught out recently for not having enough advertising in a teleshopping segment. The reason for the rule is to stop channels getting reclassified and flouting advertising limits.

But its difficult to see whats to stop a babechanel going back to being Editorial and flipping over to Teleshopping for 1-3 hour segments, like Five and ITV do. Then it could mix erotic film (Editorial) with babe interaction (Teleshopping). There might be a maximum limit, and they would still have to abide by scheduling rules, probably ruling out Confessions Of A Shagger (cert 15) during the day, when kids might be watching.

Assuming they could fill the day, that would still leave the evenings. A lot of soft porn films are dire, and they get repetitive after a while, but there is still some good stuff out there. The Beast. Ai No Korida. There are a range of foreign films that are not very marketable in the UK, particularly old ones, where it might be possible to snap up UK rights for a song. Try the 8 "Bedside" films from Sweden, 1970-1976, all considered mainstream but two contained hardcore sex (trailer for Hopla På Sengekanten here). Or the 6 Zodiac films, including "Agent 69 Jensen i Skyttens tegn" aka In the Sign of the Sagittarius (sic) with its radio transmitter orally operated condom. Tame by modern R18 standards, but stronger than typical 18. Throw in some serious but explicit sex documentaries, nude ballet, Jeff Coons retrospectives and Ofcom would be a quandry. Make sure it has all been shown on mainstream TV (UK or abroad) or has a BBFC 18 certificate.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Digital Dave - 08-01-2012 16:50

Interesting.

I suppose from a business point of view the babe channels might say it's not worth it because there's no revenue coming in whilst the films are showing. They could still have a discreet caption advertising their offscreen girls though.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Grawth - 09-01-2012 00:06

(08-01-2012 16:50 )Digital Dave Wrote:  Interesting.

I suppose from a business point of view the babe channels might say it's not worth it because there's no revenue coming in whilst the films are showing. They could still have a discreet caption advertising their offscreen girls though.

They should have topless signing for their films :-)