Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 |
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 08-10-2018 22:09 As nightshows have changed it seems attitudes towards them have as well. The more cynical and more unforgiving disposition I had about nightshows and the babes in years gone by seems to have become much more widespread on here to my eyes at least. In a sense this pleases me. People seeing through the relentless dross and the motivation of the channels to screw as much money as possible out of as many folk as possible in as many ways as possible while expending as little effort, investment, imagination and energy as possible. The attitude of the babes has seemingly become more important too. In one way I have to welcome this. In times gone by I regarded the attitude of babes as equally important if not more so than anything else in my judgement as to their quality. Those who were consistently good on the phone, consistently put in the effort and enthusiasm with no hint of diva mentality. I get a sense of pleasure from a feeling that babes with a positive attitude are being chief recipients of praise on here. The main examples of this are Scarlett Jones and Atlanta Moreno. Their top two placings at the UKAP Awards nightshow category spoke volumes. The fact that they converse with people on here and through social media in a relentlessly positive fashion sets them apart in so many ways. I did not vote for either of them by the way but that is irrelevant. I can absolutely understand motivation for people voting Scarlett or Atlanta even if my vote did not go their way. Had I voted using the same mentality of years past I would have voted Scarlett or Atlanta too. But as the shows have changed so has my general outlook on them. I have become more irrational in my appreciation of them. I just don't look at nightshows the same way anymore. Far less concerned with babes attitude far more rebellious in a desire for babes to get naked, shake booty, oil up, get in the shower and anything less won't do. My preoccupation now is who I fancy the most and whose performance I like the most. This is a source of regret and feels somewhat strange. At a time when the priority focus of others has moved towards babe attitudes mine has veered away from that to something rather more blunt and crude. I have done the reverse of growing up and become a rebel without a meaningful cause anymore . I almost feel guilty for perhaps not appreciating a positive attitude enough and those that demonstrate it perhaps better than anyone i.e Scarlett and Atlanta. Disillusioned perhaps that Lola Knight ever moved to a channel where the very best of her had no chance to be seen i.e Xpanded while at the same time appreciating Michelle Moist's supposed ability to defy the limitations of the very same channel in a quite scintillating fashion. Yes that's right Snookered has become a true double standard applying buffoon of the lowest order. Well done me . The feeling I have now is one of Ashley Emma is all . No I don't blame myself for that either . She is pretty breathtaking after all . That being said however there is a part of me that yearns for the snookered of old to make a return. The only ability I still have is to say stuff in a billion words when a hundred will do. But some habits die hard you know . RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 09-10-2018 14:15 As a guy who loves long flowing locks there seems to be a trend for the girls to have their hair heavily platted. You can nearly see their scalp Rosie's done it today and Aemelia has done it on the last two nights... RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lukebrown06 - 10-10-2018 14:05 So the stunning*, beautiful*, polite*, lovely* and easy going* Lucindacutexx said she was going to be joining Studio 66 tv in October. Does, anyone know when she will be on air, or has she backed out AGAIN? *delete as appropriate. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - darren73 - 10-10-2018 21:30 RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 11-10-2018 11:01 ^I think that just kicked the 'Cute' part of her twitter name into touch. I'm trying to think of a more apt name of 4 letter beginning with 'C' p.s. and we don't drink Meadow Dew. Real men drink Iron Bru RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 11-10-2018 11:08 Not part of the Twitterati so she is a complete mystery to me. What makes her so sure that S66 will,use her anyway? RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 11-10-2018 11:10 (11-10-2018 11:01 )Charlemagne Wrote: ^I think that just kicked the 'Cute' part of her twitter name into touch. ^And beer & Real Ale you left that part out RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 11-10-2018 11:29 (11-10-2018 11:08 )GreenMachine Wrote: Not part of the Twitterati so she is a complete mystery to me. You lucky bastard, I wish she was to me lol, when she turns on you she is quite scary, she simply is nuts no other way to put it, all the channels bosses know she is mad as well which is why no one gives her any work, She's pretty to look at but not nice inside, she attacked me in a 2 hour long DM rant on Twitter showed her true colours that day and I don't want to ever go back near her RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 11-10-2018 12:52 (11-10-2018 11:29 )winsaw Wrote: She's pretty to look at but not nice inside... To each their own mate but both sides pretty much match as far as I'm concerned RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - darren73 - 11-10-2018 13:00 (11-10-2018 12:52 )KerrAvon Wrote:not spoken to her on twitter then(11-10-2018 11:29 )winsaw Wrote: She's pretty to look at but not nice inside... |