+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bluebird TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=165)
+---- Thread: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=19210)
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - OSSETTLAD - 15-06-2010 11:53
(15-06-2010 10:56 )Rogerbee Wrote: Really!? Hmm, is this going to be any good then!? Doesn't sound like we're going to get much to watch.
I just can not see how its going to work cause they say you ring the number then you decided which girl you want then on where you want to talk to her in the Bluebar, but if there is more than 1 freeviewer ringing up what they going to do. Example caller 1 wants Amanda and asks her to dance next to the dance pole another rings for Reede and wants her somewhere else in the Bluebar what they going to do split screen it what they do if there is third, 3 screen it you see where I am going with 4 cause there are 6 girls altogheter. I know that sky will have people ringing as well but more people got freeview than sky. So basically its not going to work on Freeview with just 1 channel.
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - general drago - 15-06-2010 12:24
sorry for sticking my newbie nose in but why are you freeviewers complaining about getting less bb channels than sky.what makes you think you should get more than us paying sky viewers?
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 15-06-2010 12:26
I notice that Natasha Max and Heavenly are appearing on one of your DVD's called TVBabes.
Are you planning to also use them on your shows?
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - john block - 15-06-2010 13:04
(15-06-2010 11:53 )OSSETTLAD Wrote: So basically its not going to work on Freeview with just 1 channel.
Obviously it won't work on freeview. The way described is only relevant to Sky viewers with multi-channels.
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - OSSETTLAD - 15-06-2010 13:16
(15-06-2010 12:24 )general drago Wrote: sorry for sticking my newbie nose in but why are you freeviewers complaining about getting less bb channels than sky.what makes you think you should get more than us paying sky viewers?
For your information you sky guys are not paying for these channels as I believe you can also get them on Freesat and they only pay a 1 of payment. So get your facts right before putting your 2p worth in.
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 15-06-2010 17:16
(15-06-2010 12:24 )general drago Wrote: sorry for sticking my newbie nose in but why are you freeviewers complaining about getting less bb channels than sky.what makes you think you should get more than us paying sky viewers?Sorry to tell you mate but all the sky babe shows on sky are free and you don't need a Sky subscription in any shape or form to be able to watch them they are 100% FREE just the same as freeview all you need is a Sky set top box and dish instead of freeview box/tv and aerial and no Sky subscription is required , you only need to subscribe to the encrypted shows , and you do not need to subscribe to Sky in order to receive Encrypted shows , you just subscribe to the shows providing the encrypted service So in essence Sky viewers don't deserve any more shows than freeviews because they do not pay to see the shows either . The only reason there is not as many babe shows on freeview is because air time on freeview is very expensive and freeview air space is limited , only company's with vast amounts of money are able to put more than one show on freeview , Cellcast have several and not many company's can compete with the financial muscle of Cellcast .
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - seancarterjz - 15-06-2010 18:00
BlueBird really needs to get Kelly Bell from the Pad . Your signings will be incomplete without her !
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - general drago - 15-06-2010 19:00
i was talking about the fact that i pay monthly for sky in general not individual channels.in my opinion freeview shouldn't be treated fairly because it's for lazy and benefit scoundrels who can't actually earn a good living and pay for sky.don't forget the babe channels started on sky they wouldn't be here without us.i really don't want to incite an argument so i'm just going end discussion about it and look forward to the launch of Bluebird which i hope is soon.
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - OSSETTLAD - 15-06-2010 19:36
(15-06-2010 19:00 )general drago Wrote: i was talking about the fact that i pay monthly for sky in general not individual channels.in my opinion freeview shouldn't be treated fairly because it's for lazy and benefit scoundrels who can't actually earn a good living and pay for sky.don't forget the babe channels started on sky they wouldn't be here without us.i really don't want to incite an argument so i'm just going end discussion about it and look forward to the launch of Bluebird which i hope is soon.
Oh well I am sorry for being lazy and having a really shit pay job I better get a better one so I can get sky TV.
Talk about kicking someone in the nuts.
You say you do not want to start an argument and you put that on that I put in bold. That is just not a nice thing to say I can not afford Sky TV. So I suggest you appologise for what you said.
RE: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion - big dick - 15-06-2010 21:20
(15-06-2010 18:00 )seancarterjz Wrote: BlueBird really needs to get Kelly Bell from the Pad . Your signings will be incomplete without her !
Your right kelly bell would be good on bluebrid but really good on the freeview channel she hot