+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Xtreme Filth (/forumdisplay.php?fid=335)
+---- Thread: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61914)
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - William H Bonney - 30-09-2014 13:21
(30-09-2014 12:57 )mr mystery Wrote: Thats why i'm saying you cannot really compare a Rugby team using the ground of a football team to the relation ship between XF using the STD 66 studios and being broadcast by STD 66, it's totally different
It may be totally different to you, but to me the principle involved is exactly the same.
Anyway you can carry on disagreeing if you like, but I won't answer because I've already said what I think, that's the two cases involve the same principle and it's a fair comparison.
I'm not going to argue the point anymore as I fear the scorn of Kartel.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 30-09-2014 14:06
(30-09-2014 12:27 )Charlemagne Wrote: This arguement has just got into a points scoring contest.
Can you guys let me know when this aimless debate is over, and then I can kick all the relevent posts into the twilight zone.
This is probably the right moment to show I'm a bigger man than winsaw by stepping away from his continual straw man posts and his petty arguments. He only recycles the same arguments anyway, continually repeating posts from a week ago, or even a fortnight ago, which I why I've taken to referring back to previous posts, rather than join him in continually repeating things. Besides it's not good for the image of a distinguished person such as myself to be seen arguing with the likes of him.
I hereby endorse the post made by PhredE as being the most sensible one made in this thread in recent days and as being a good and fair assessment of the matter under discussion. I will not post in this thread again, regardless of the likelihood that winsaw will try and provoke me into doing so.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 30-09-2014 14:31
(30-09-2014 13:21 )William H Bonney Wrote:(30-09-2014 12:57 )mr mystery Wrote: Thats why i'm saying you cannot really compare a Rugby team using the ground of a football team to the relation ship between XF using the STD 66 studios and being broadcast by STD 66, it's totally different
It may be totally different to you, but to me the principle involved is exactly the same.
Well it isn't to me lol, i understand were the original poster was coming from, but for me there are just so many differences for the principle to be exactly the same .
As well as the stuff iv'e already posted, one last point/disagreement that i forgot to mention in regard to STD 66 being likened a football stadium and XF a Rugby team using it's facilities etc, is that STD 66 does not own the actual studios (stadium) that XF broadcasts from, nor the channel slot, both are owned by 2 separate independent company's from STD 66 .
The owners of the studios/stadium were STD 66/XF broadcasts from are not responsible for for the TV content that is broadcast from the studios they own, they are not the ones granted a TV broadcast licence by Ofcom .The people behind STD 66 own the TV broadcast licence of Ch 942, they regulate and control the output of XF, so that's another difference .
PS, if everyone agreed how boring would this forum be ? .
{edit} I do hope the XF girls don't have a twitter strop and think they are be likened to rugby players lol .
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - 7 stars of the orient - 30-09-2014 15:04
(30-09-2014 14:31 )mr mystery Wrote: One last point/disagreement that i forgot to mention in regard to STD 66 being likened a football stadium and XF a Rugby team using it's facilities etc, is that STD 66 does not own the studios (stadium) that XF broadcasts from, nor the channel slot, both are owned by 2 separate independent company's from STD 66 .
What difference does that make?
I'm an Orient supporter and we don't own our own ground. We rent it. We hold the license not the stadium owners. Leeds don't own their ground either, but they are still the license holders.
And that doesn't stop us (or Leeds) from allowing other uses of the stadium, such as pop concerts.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 30-09-2014 15:15
(30-09-2014 15:04 )7 stars of the orient Wrote: What difference does that make?
I'm an Orient supporter and we don't own our own ground. We rent it. We hold the license not the stadium owners. Leeds don't own their ground either, but they are still the license holders.
And that doesn't stop us (or Leeds) from allowing other uses of the stadium, such as pop concerts.
you have so missed the point, what mr mystery is saying is that if a rugby club was renting your ground and that rugby team had a mass fight you the football club would not get fined the rugby club would but in babeshow land it works the other way with 66(the football club) getting the fine if XF(the rugby club) do wrong
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 30-09-2014 15:27
(30-09-2014 14:06 )admiral decker Wrote: This is probably the right moment to show I'm a bigger man than winsaw by stepping away
well i am very disappointed in you trying to use Danth's law as a way of trying to claim victory and i thank you as this one last desperate act has given me the debate thank you again,
sorry you are off as i have had such fun
with you
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - 7 stars of the orient - 30-09-2014 15:45
(30-09-2014 15:15 )winsaw Wrote: you have so missed the point, what mr mystery is saying is that if a rugby club was renting your ground and that rugby team had a mass fight you the football club would not get fined the rugby club would but in babeshow land it works the other way with 66(the football club) getting the fine if XF(the rugby club) do wrong
What a pedantic argument.
I see what admiral decker meant about you and your petty arguments.
If you think I'm going to be an admiral decker substitute so you can carry on your petty arguments you're very much mistaken. I've no intention of being a substitute for him.
Simple fact - whether it's TV or sport a breach of license conditions means that the license holder is going to be held responsible.
Don't bother replying because I'm not interested in pedantic arguments.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 30-09-2014 16:01
(30-09-2014 15:45 )7 stars of the orient Wrote: What a pedantic argument.
I see what admiral decker meant about you and your petty arguments.
If you think I'm going to be an admiral decker substitute so you can carry on your petty arguments you're very much mistaken. I've no intention of being a substitute for him.
Simple fact - whether it's TV or sport a breach of license conditions means that the license holder is going to be held responsible.
this thread has done nothing but amaze me, how so many seam to not be able to understand the most simple of facts, mr mystery is correct i tried to simplify it for you but you still don't get it,
i will try again, in the sports parlance we are talking about the playing side of things we are not talking about the stadium license we are saying that what a club dose on the field is what they get punched for but in babeshow land 66 would get the fine for something it did not do, please say you get it now
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 30-09-2014 16:28
(30-09-2014 16:01 )winsaw Wrote: i will try again, in the sports parlance we are talking about the playing side of things we are not talking about the stadium license we are saying that what a club dose on the field is what they get punched for but in babeshow land 66 would get the fine for something it did not do, please say you get it now
And if, during the rugby match, there was a (preventable) riot on the terraces, who gets done for that?
Genuine question btw, this is all very intriguing
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - 7 stars of the orient - 30-09-2014 16:30
(30-09-2014 16:01 )winsaw Wrote: how so many seam to not be able to understand the most simple of facts,
Here's a simple fact - I'm not interested in pedantic arguments.
Are you able to understand that?