+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Grawth - 23-01-2012 23:56
To sum up:
If I want to laugh I will watch a comedy
If I want to cry I will watch a tear-jerker
If I want to be scared I will watch a horror movie
If I want an adrenaline rush I will watch an action movie
But if I want to be aroused I must hit myself repeatedly on the head with a brick until the bad thoughts go away!
No, I don't understand it either!
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 24-01-2012 00:00
^^
Brill!
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Suurbier - 24-01-2012 12:39
nice one
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - anchorman - 25-01-2012 00:20
Anyone see the shamless episode earlier,sex scene with positions you would see in a porn lol at one point i thought they were gonna show penetration
when you see what normal shows can do before 12 and flick on the 900 channels late into the night and you see the tame shit they show.......only proves what kind of a scam ofcom are running.Ofcom,deep down must love these channels......easy money
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 25-01-2012 00:39
(25-01-2012 00:20 )babefinder Wrote: Anyone see the shamless episode earlier,sex scene with positions you would see in a porn lol at one point i thought they were gonna show penetration
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/shameless/4od (40:40 for the impatient)
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - anchorman - 25-01-2012 01:06
Cheers stan,its even better the second time i watched
that was the end of the show,so it was on before 11 o clock LMFAO.How babe channels pay the fines ofcom give is beyond me 
KIDS watching is ofcom's biggest defence for fining the channels if i was young and looking for a sneaky wank i wouldn't be watching the 900s....id be watching shamless 
LOL
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 25-01-2012 02:34
Yeah, it's beyond pathetic that we can't see close to that on the babe channels. It's all a tease, but a normal body part is not allowed???
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - IanG - 25-01-2012 16:04
OFCOM's stance is simply untenable. It is clear that the British public do NOT have a problem with the portrayal of explicit sex and nudity on TV else OFCOM would be inundated with complaints about programmes such as The Sex Education Show, Embarrassing Bodies and the Lover's Guide on Body in Balance TV. If these explicit portrayals of sex and nudity are not deemed harmful and offensive and do not require special restrictions (e.g. mandatory PIN) to 'protect vulnerable people' then neither do any other channels showing exactly the same type of material in some other context. Indeed, to allow such material in one context but not another is ridiculous and clearly discriminatory. The material itself is the same - explicit sex and nudity - thus if this CONTENT caused harm or offence it would cause harm or offence in any context. The law says it is the CONTENT OF PROGRAMMES that OFCOM are to concern themselves with, NOT the 'CONTEXT' in which it appears. Indeed, it is on this unnecessary and unlawful issue of supposed 'contextual justification' that OFCOM has based every single one of its discriminatory, unnecessary and unlawful decisions.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 26-01-2012 01:11
(25-01-2012 16:04 )IanG Wrote: OFCOM's stance is simply untenable. It is clear that the British public do NOT have a problem with the portrayal of explicit sex and nudity on TV else OFCOM would be inundated with complaints about programmes such as The Sex Education Show, Embarrassing Bodies and the Lover's Guide on Body in Balance TV.
This does raise another question; if sex and nudity on tv are not the problem - as is clearly illustrated here - then just what is Ofcom's problem with the babeshows?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 26-01-2012 01:59
They cant stand sex for enjoyment. They probably believe that the political class cant either.