![]() |
|
HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Hall Of Fame (/forumdisplay.php?fid=359) +---- Thread: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=80446) |
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 14-12-2025 22:23 Knockout rounds 1v8, 4 v5, 3v6, and 2 v7. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - The Silent Majority - 15-12-2025 02:03 (14-12-2025 22:19 )SecretAgent Wrote: Can you explain those draws please No, none of that makes any sense to me either. By my count you have 5 girls tieing on 3 votes, at the bottom of the draw. A quick run off between them, for the last place in the draw, would give a quarter final of 8. (disclaimer, I'm half asleep, my counts might be wrong )Edit: That's the night draw I'm talking about. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - TDK2008 - 15-12-2025 04:07 How many of your Hall of Fame 2025 nominations made it to the Quarter Finals? 2/3 of my Nights Babes made it: Nicole Snow and Ella Jolie with Michelle Moist missing out. 0/3 of my Days Babes made it: Alex Adams, Gemma Hiles and Lynsey Atkinson. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - SecretAgent - 15-12-2025 06:45 (14-12-2025 22:23 )Charlemagne Wrote: Knockout rounds 1v8, 4 v5, 3v6, and 2 v7. Sorry Charles I don’t get it. There are 11 girls in the last 8 for nightime so surely a quick run off makes more sense. I haven’t checked where the ties for votes were but if Silent Majority is right and 5 tied at the bottom how did the distribution across the quarter final take place. In the Daytime vote if the distribution for the quarter finals is correct that would mean 4v5 has 2 girls who tied 5th. Which means a girl who came 9th has got into the quarter finals! In this case that would seem to be Linda Leigh. Is that really the case?. I’ll hold onto my votes until I understand. If that means I lose my vote so be it. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 15-12-2025 07:56 Send me a message and I'll be glad to discuss this with you. It was explained earlier what was going to happen and this has happened in previous years in many of the competitions. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - The Silent Majority - 15-12-2025 08:08 How about discussing it here, instead of in secret
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 15-12-2025 08:26 ^ I direct you to my previous post. And to post 454. So many babes were being nominated then it was always possible that this could happen. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - The Silent Majority - 15-12-2025 08:32 (15-12-2025 08:26 )Charlemagne Wrote: ^ I direct you to my previous post. And to post 454. You said this would be a worse case scenario. So you've gone straight there without considering any better options. Is there a particular reason Lucy Zara has been left out of this, all encompassing, draw? Since she appears to have 3 votes, the same as Lynda Leigh, Lolly, Ella, and Sophie Hart. RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - SecretAgent - 15-12-2025 08:34 I agree with Silent Majority. A simple explanation should suffice but if thats not going to happen I won’t take part because as it stands I’m left thinking that it’s not a fair contest. I honestly would have thought thats the least that would happen as its WE the members who are voting and we should be able to understand it! There is no time pressure if the voting takes a few days longer. I’m not criticising individuals just asking for clarity & all members deserve that surely? RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 15-12-2025 08:53 A nomination for Lucy Zara had been missed. She has now been added to the remaining match up. All those who have already voted have been offered the chance to change their votes. |