+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation OSG (/showthread.php?tid=19246)
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - babestation - 09-03-2011 10:51
(08-03-2011 18:09 )Ally4Paige Wrote: hope you put our views across as well!! If not this campaign will continue until something is finally done about it!!
Well we've always maintained that we do pass your constructive thoughts on. Saying that, there's only so many times you can say the same things to the same people before you have to accept that ultimately the producers will do what they think is best, not what you think is best. I have a feeling that what they do and what you think they should do are unlikely to ever match.
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - bytor - 15-03-2011 07:41
Is there any news on the 'easier on the eye' On-screen graphics that were promised before Christmas for 'early in the new year'.
Perhaps BS did not mean the official New Year but the financial new year given that April is knocking on the door. Actually April 1st as a launch date would be highly appropriate
I know it's been said before but it is highly distracting to be chatting to a girl only for two black boxes, half a screen of buy a pic and a flashing girl caller graphic to all but block the reason for the call. I won't even start on the sudden change to the girl with a mic who seems to believe we want to see her more than the girl on the phone....Oh too late I started!! Come on guys make BS the pleasure it used to be.
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - TwistedChaz - 15-03-2011 17:58
We're getting close!
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - bunnybc - 15-03-2011 21:53
(04-03-2011 14:40 )shankey! Wrote: you wanna try sticking around for the fade ins and outs of girl caller every few minutes or gerrie trying to flog pics of camilla"s growler when we all know what it looks like!
Or even worse is when the little black box tries to get you to send a £3 text message for a pic of Ella "totally revealed". To me that would mean totally naked, I'm sure that this is not the case however. Surely these channels are subject to consumer laws like every other company?
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - Jam Da Man - 15-03-2011 21:58
(15-03-2011 17:58 )TwistedChaz Wrote: We're getting close!
Yeah mate, another 9 months and it'll be Christmas again!
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - bytor - 16-03-2011 07:36
(15-03-2011 21:53 )bunnybc Wrote:(04-03-2011 14:40 )shankey! Wrote: you wanna try sticking around for the fade ins and outs of girl caller every few minutes or gerrie trying to flog pics of camilla"s growler when we all know what it looks like!
Or even worse is when the little black box tries to get you to send a £3 text message for a pic of Ella "totally revealed". To me that would mean totally naked, I'm sure that this is not the case however. Surely these channels are subject to consumer laws like every other company?
They do post pictures of the girls naked. People just assume naked means they are showing everything. It doesn't; it can just mean that they have no clothes on but are posing with a hand placed demurely etc.
While some of their sales techniques may be questionable I think you will find Cellcast could defend quite successfully any legal challenge to their advertising statements.
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - TheWatcher - 22-03-2011 10:28
Totally unnecessary flashing text, just like in the picture below
That info is already given in the message box.
![[Image: 2011_03_21_y.jpg]](http://www.imagechunk.com/viewer.php?file=2011_03_21_y.jpg)
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - Dan Volatile - 22-03-2011 22:31
That's not a bad effort TheWatcher but I think I can beat it.
Three girl caller! messages AND three black boxes.
They have graphics boffins toiling twenty-four seven to to improve their OSGs and it's clearly paying dividends.
(Right, I'm off for a game of London Bus Routes if anyone's interested.)
![[Image: osg_1.wmv_snapshot_00.11_[2011.03.22_22.14.jpg]](http://www.imagechunk.com/viewer.php?file=osg_1.wmv_snapshot_00.11_%5B2011.03.22_22.14.jpg)
RE: Crap OSG - rawr1 - 23-03-2011 18:09
(09-03-2011 10:51 )babestation Wrote: ...I have a feeling that what they do and what you think they should do are unlikely to ever match.
I have a feeling that if you employ monkeys for peanuts you get shit thrown all over your screen...
![[Image: lolids.jpg]](http://img191.imageshack.us/i/lolids.jpg/)
Seriously, who in their right mind thinks that is the best approach to attract men into calling a gorgeous girl?
You guys at Cellcast HQ are gonna have to do more than interject with "our hands are tied but we've passed the message on" nonspeak and phoney "design our new OSG!" competitions to keep the "moaners" quiet I'm afraid
RE: Babestation OSG are utter CRAP - Ally4Paige - 23-03-2011 18:42
(22-03-2011 22:31 )Dan Volatile Wrote: They have graphics boffins toiling twenty-four seven to to improve their OSGs and it's clearly paying dividends.
]
What graphics boffins? If this is the stuff produced by what passes for graphics boffins they are quite clearly useless at their job and should be fired FORTHWITH!!