+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: Sports Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+----- Forum: Cricket (/forumdisplay.php?fid=215)
+----- Thread: Cricket Banter (/showthread.php?tid=31128)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 14-05-2014 10:52
How ironic that Lancashire T20 side are called lightning,their 3 best players are Chapple (40) Prince (36) Flintoff (36) can't see them being lightning in the field.
Glen Chapple is one of the finest Yorkshiremen never to have played for them.
RE: Cricket Banter - Billy_Nomates - 15-05-2014 16:19
I'm not sure if Flintoff is fit enough to bowl?
Nicknames: I thought many/most of the counties had jettisoned their nicknames?
RE: Cricket Banter - Jack Bishop - 15-05-2014 22:25
I believe the majority of the counties have retained their nicknames, at least for the 2014 season.
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 15-05-2014 23:20
The best name change has to be Worcester,formerly Royals,now Rapids.Shows a great sense of humour as their ground New Road gets flooded annually.
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 15-05-2014 23:33
Nat West T20 Bash - Nicknames (or not)
Birmingham Bears (formerly Warwickshire Bears)
Derbyshire Falcons
Durham Jets
Lancashire Lightning
Leicestershire Foxes
Northants Steelbacks
Nottinghamshire Outlaws
Worcester Rapids
Yorkshire Vikings
Essex Eagles
Glamorgan
Gloucestershire
Hampshire
Kent Spitfires
Middlesex Panthers
Sonerset
Surrey
Sussex Sharks
RE: Cricket Banter - Mister Gummidge - 16-05-2014 00:36
Durham Jets. Hmph.
The alliteration is gone. I adore adequately amusing alliteration. Durham's distressing "Dynamo" dropping is distinctly disturbing. Missing the moniker I might moan and mither until mollified.
RE: Cricket Banter - Jack Bishop - 16-05-2014 06:37
I am sure I will be able to think up some of my own nicknames for the counties that have dropped their own.
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 16-05-2014 09:34
I actually think that the clubs PR people are missing a trick here with some of the clubs choosing not to have nicknames.I thought the original concept of T20 (which we invented before India & Australia did a better job of it) was to appeal to a new & largely younger audience.This is a re-launch/revamp of the competition & clubs seem to be doing what they want,the teams without nicknames makes them look like killjoys & smacks of arrogance.
Then we have Warwickshire who have gone off at a tangent on their own by going down the route of the city franchise names,something that has been considered but dismissed,for now as they feel that the counties have such a strong history & identity that supporter wouldn't take to it.
If this reformatted competition fails then reducing the 18 counties down to 8 or 10 sides is the next logical step,maybe Warwickshire,or Birmingham as they like to call themselves know something we don't.
RE: Cricket Banter - Jack Bishop - 16-05-2014 10:48
Interesting article from the telegraph about T20 structure:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/twenty20/10833162/Twenty20-revolution-does-not-go-far-enough.html
RE: Cricket Banter - Rammyrascal - 17-05-2014 16:14
have enjoyed the t20 blast so far even though my team Lancashire Lightning lost their opening game