+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - 2015watcher - 25-04-2020 16:03
Babes when they see freeloaders then..
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chrisst - 26-04-2020 19:00
(09-04-2020 13:41 )ShandyHand Wrote: ^ Ahh thank you. My broader knowledge lets me down again. I thought there might have been stuff elsewhere.
There was also this from Elena J earlier this year but that more like slip or tease isn't it than putting it front and centre to be bought on main.
She's doing it again, early Sunday evening on Web Only
![[Image: image-736E_5EA5DA43.jpg]](https://www.babeimage.co.uk/image-736E_5EA5DA43.jpg)
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Landed - 28-04-2020 14:28
The future seems to be mapped out now for the channels with only Xpanded hanging on to its old format. I have seen this coming for some time and the lock down has moved everything forward. It can move over to franchising soon as the next big thing as the studio 66 should be renamed home girls 66. Studio 66 are really on top of this now from there point of view, no expensive studios, cameramen or ' directors ' to pay. Each girl can sign up for certain hours and more choice in theory. At the moment quite a few of the 'old guard ' still hanging around OK with that but some nights they have three on at once. Babestation has gone a similar way but still use the studio with maybe three/four babe's to cover the TV and do webs how's. Is Jessica West's BG shows the way they will go, pure hardcore port I wonder or a mix, depends on the profit margins I suppose. Look how little you see of Ashley Emma now no pay no see her hand covering up the promised land lol that is how it's going to be. I rang a s66 babe and I evenue asked her if she went topless on a call, yes till I got on the blower and she wanted tipping for Tits. NO LOVE I HUNG UP they are increasingly getting covered up even Lucy Gresley was doing it last night.
How long before the TV channels are just one person station and there are advertising there 'at home ' selection
Rant over
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chrisst - 28-04-2020 15:02
Time will tell but I'm not convinced that Studio 66 will want to become Homegirls 66 because:
1. It's a dilution of the brand.
2. It's second class.
3. The girls like the social side of it, Charmaine
calls it her 'Adult time'.4. The internet so far does not lend itself to providing a good enough picture.
5. It's more difficult to ensure the output is compliant.
I think they'll be delighted to be back in the studio but it will result in a lot of issues because the girls have had a free for all with their own shows and hitherto the studio hasn't been able to accommodate such diversity.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - covkid - 28-04-2020 15:51
(28-04-2020 14:28 )Landed Wrote: The future seems to be mapped out now for the channels with only Xpanded hanging on to its old format. I have seen this coming for some time and the lock down has moved everything forward. It can move over to franchising soon as the next big thing as the studio 66 should be renamed home girls 66. Studio 66 are really on top of this now from there point of view, no expensive studios, cameramen or ' directors ' to pay. Each girl can sign up for certain hours and more choice in theory. At the moment quite a few of the 'old guard ' still hanging around OK with that but some nights they have three on at once. Babestation has gone a similar way but still use the studio with maybe three/four babe's to cover the TV and do webs how's. Is Jessica West's BG shows the way they will go, pure hardcore port I wonder or a mix, depends on the profit margins I suppose. Look how little you see of Ashley Emma now no pay no see her hand covering up the promised land lol that is how it's going to be. I rang a s66 babe and I evenue asked her if she went topless on a call, yes till I got on the blower and she wanted tipping for Tits. NO LOVE I HUNG UP they are increasingly getting covered up even Lucy Gresley was doing it last night.
How long before the TV channels are just one person station and there are advertising there 'at home ' selection
Rant over
The girls need to get in the "real world". They seem to think that everyone has the same amount of money before the Coronavirus pandemic started. Many people now have a lot less money and can't spend their money on the girls but too many girls are asking for ridiculous tips ie: 400 credits for a twerk (we all know all I am talking about) or 1000 for topless.
If the phone costs and pervecam costs were reduced they may do a lot more business. There are also so many more girls asking for business. Some times there are upwards of 20 girls on cam.
A final point to the girls, at least try smiling. Guys won't call you if you have a permanent pout face.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chrisst - 28-04-2020 16:34
Agreed Covkid
I've seen a lot of variation in the value of tip goals. Grace Elisabeth
for example smiles and has grown a community of fans in the month she's been here. She charges a grand for oily tits and it's met in an hour, or less. Then she does another and another...Others don't smile and charge 200 for oily tits and I can't be bothered to see whether it's met.
Not only do viewers have less money but they also have their families at home and can't take part.
I've not seen 20 girls on but certainly a dozen.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 29-04-2020 00:22
you all still bemoaning the same shit? PSST! go elsewhere.. let them sink or swim without you.
its pretty simple really they are counting on you being loyal fanbois. even if your not paying them to watch they are counting on you being there... why?..
to hold you up to management and say look at all these guys watching for free, why should i get my pussy out if no one is paying. they then use this to excuse low earnings because they have no punters because they dont show anything despite charging 4-5 quid a minute.
and despite the guys who pay the price they then get hit up for tips to do anything more than show. they really are taking the piss out of you...
go to chaturbate or some other site you will find similar housewife looking or insta-filter models that are a dime a dozen and certainly dont have these gurls south london fuck you attitude...
they really dont deserve your money unless your into this kind of abuse... if you are fair play have fun... but the rest of you tell these entitled past there prime bar girls and housewives to fuck off.
better still spend the money you were gonna waste on them on your other half... you never know she may even blow you for it
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 02-05-2020 14:55
(28-04-2020 15:02 )Chrisst Wrote: Time will tell but I'm not convinced that Studio 66 will want to become Homegirls 66 because:
1. It's a dilution of the brand.
2. ....
Interesting debating points as ever Chrisst. Broadly speaking, it's only #4 I'd disagree with. 'The internet' has been ready to do this for a good while now. CB and MFC manage perfectly well at it. Unfortunately, the way 66 have this working can't, IMO, be optimal for getting good results from the widest variety of set ups. (You could argue they were rushed into their actions by the virus restrictions but all operators should surely have been better equipped to put out top quality home streams by this point. That BS have implied they couldn't have made switch to all babes working remotely appears, on the face of it, a little shocking. You have to wonder whether it was more a financial decision for them to remain in studio?)
Whatever the mitigation, it seems some 66 babes have home set ups that are in some way inadequate to the task. And, to be frank, there are certain things a properly conscientious babe should have discovered by this point...
A. There's more to putting out a good quality stream than buying the first expensive laptop and webcam you see.
B. The poor picture problem is NOT across the board at 66, some babes manage to get perfect pictures to their guys.
C. Given B, it must be theoretically fixable for all babes to do the same - IF they have access to right knowledge, softwate and equipment (including, but not limited to, having broadband with a good upload speed) that'll work well with what 66 have in place.
D. Trying to stream via wifi, as some babes are doing, is always going to result in an inferior output.
I do agree though taht the studio shows will return... for a while at least, primarily because this period has proven the operator is not yet ready to make a permanent switch as yet.
P.S. Can I echo dance's request in another thread Chrisst: There's something that needs to be asked of you, if you would turn on your PMs for a bit please?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chrisst - 02-05-2020 17:19
I meant 'the internet' in its widest context.
However I can't agree with you that:
B. The poor picture is NOT across the board at 66, some babes manage to get perfect pictures to their guys.
I've posted an estimation of picture quality here but I think that even the best are only making 480p (or at least not 1080p) and I don't think they ever can.
I think that the signal is compromised during it's handling from her home to mine and to avoid buffering the studio have standardised on fewer pixels. I surmise that if they adopted a higher reolution then some would be better but some would buffer all the time.
I can't judge how many pixels but watching the rolling video on the Info Channel really reminds me what we're missing. I believe that the studio picture is a higher quality than Babestation's or any on Stripchat.
BTW here's gallerys66's opinion hot off the press
![[Image: image-E7C4_5EADAA95.jpg]](https://www.babeimage.co.uk/image-E7C4_5EADAA95.jpg)
I surmise too that BS couldn't make the switch to all their babes home working because the internet at, for example, Hannah Claydon's
house isn't good enough.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 02-05-2020 20:19
Perfect was indeed a poor choice of word. "Relatively decent" then.
My point is if you think Grace's picture quality is the best atm then there's no real reason why they can't all look at least as good as hers. Yes 480p is shite but that's down to 66 (presumably downstream of the babe's output?) as I said. (I'm sure you're spot on about resolution v buffering being the compromise being made but it's a compromise because of what else they have in place. Change the facilities and I'm sure theyre cams could look like those of CB babes - some of whom broadcast in 4k.) 480p shouldn't be happening but also there must be other stuff letting even that down with a lot of babes.
Most of their webcam will be HD capable as a minimum, so the finger may be pointing most often at the upload speeds they are paying for. (I'm told Arura's not on atm because her internet isn't sufficient for instance.)