Sarah Louise - Babeworld - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Babeworld (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +---- Thread: Sarah Louise - Babeworld (/showthread.php?tid=1071) |
RE: sarah lou - Rammyrascal - 26-06-2009 13:52 did think that but wasnt sure. ive met sarah-lou and she's a really nice person RE: sarah lou - jay0987 - 26-06-2009 13:53 i wonder if jet from bangbabes is as big as sarah Sarah Louise - stoly - 15-12-2009 21:37 It looks like sarah louise has joined 908 RE: Sarah Louise - DGxxx - 15-12-2009 21:43 (15-12-2009 21:37 )stoly Wrote: It looks like sarah louise has joined 908 Shouldn't that read "rejoined 908"? There's a lot of boomeranging going on... D G x x x RE: Sarah Louise - stilettos - 15-12-2009 21:51 Yes, shame she has to share a screen again,surely a step down?? Will miss her with Charlie RE: Sarah Louise - speedybert - 15-12-2009 22:22 Well it would be far too much to ask any of these channels to bring in a fresh face or two wouldn't it.I don't know why the channels don't all just merge and swap the girls around when they feel like a change of studio.That's pretty much what is happening now.Strangely enough I sort of expected this latest transfer to happen. RE: Sarah Louise - Charlemagne - 15-12-2009 22:36 If boobed babe left your channel to work on a supposed better channel and it didn't work out at the new channel would you take her back? Or do you think that Hof talked her into going back RE: Sarah Louise - stoly - 15-12-2009 22:41 Some cap's of Sarah Louise at her new home Thanks to ImageChunk.com for Free adult image host RE: Sarah Louise - leefett1980 - 16-12-2009 00:26 As long as she's on one of the channels I couldn't care less which one it was, so hot it's untrue! RE: Sarah Louise - crocodoc42 - 16-12-2009 08:39 Great to see Sarah back. Pity it's Babeworld again, though - too busy screen, poor lighting and camera angles, shared bed and unadventurous set/props, etc. Still.. better than no Sarah at all! |