Storm - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115) +---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 |
RE: Discussion and thoughts - ringo78 - 04-10-2009 10:08 although having said that, what i'd give to have 24 hours with charlie monaco in a bog RE: Discussion and thoughts - Rammyrascal - 04-10-2009 10:08 they are probably doing the elite route. start with experienced babechannel babes and then start bringing in new ones RE: Discussion and thoughts - Chilly - 04-10-2009 10:12 (04-10-2009 10:08 )ringo78 Wrote: Bangbabes was always the best for cameras and lighting. Its just a bit naff these days, seems to be 24 hrs of charlie monaco in a bog Charlie Monaco in the bog for 24 hours? Maybe she had a dodgy curry the night before. RE: Discussion and thoughts - Jay39 - 04-10-2009 12:10 Just my own opinion considering the hype from Bob, it's no different from the rest and tamer than most, I think the only thing it does have going for it is the picture quality, not in the same league as Bang Babes, Babestation or Elite, and Baileys performances of late are leading the way. Club Paradiso does have some decent ladies but very tame to that of their past on other channels, baring Juliet's stint at TVX which to be honest has to be the worst channel, even the asian babes are getting a little more daring. Unfortunately for me Roxy doesn't cut the mould of a presenter day or night, pretty lady but no interaction! Just have to wait and see if things develope or just another hyped up channel going no where fast! RE: Discussion and thoughts - Hollywood PillowPants - 04-10-2009 16:31 (03-10-2009 17:35 )Bob Paradiso Wrote:(03-10-2009 17:27 )seth Wrote: So if we're comparing channels to football clubs, this channel would be like spurs, promises much yet mediocre at best. HOLY CRAP!!! Is anyone else thinking what i'm thinking? that Bob is the poster formally known as SuperSpurs.Say it 'aint so Bob,say it 'aint so. RE: Discussion and thoughts - Chilly - 04-10-2009 16:39 He likes Spurs. Roxy, Amy and Juliet from Chat Back are there too. Hmmm...you just might be on to something there, PillowPants. RE: Discussion and thoughts - Bob Paradiso - 04-10-2009 17:27 (04-10-2009 16:31 )PillowPants Wrote: HOLY CRAP!!! Is anyone else thinking what i'm thinking? that Bob is the poster formally known as SuperSpurs.Say it 'aint so Bob,say it 'aint so. It ain't so. Whatsmore I'll put this to you in clear and simple terms: You can refer to the denizens of White Hart Lane by the following monikers. 1. Tottenham Hotspur. 2. Tottenham Hotspurs. 3. Tottenham. 4. The Hotspurs. 5. The Lilywhites. And by any number of adjectives but mainly 'glorious' and/or 'mighty'. Never 'super' and never ever bloody ever the simply odious 'Spurs'. Are we understood, old boy? Thine eyes have seen the glory of the cups at White Hart Lane, and while I bear no ill will to the impassioned cries of those in the Park Lane and so-called 'Shelf Side', those of us in the lofty boxes like to use the old lady's full name. Tottenham Hotspur. Just thought I'd clear that up. Your old chum and up your Arsenal, Bob Paradiso Esq. P.S: Talking of monikers we've the simply gorgeous Toon Army gal Monica Harris making her premiership debut here on Club Paradiso next week. Fingers crossed she comes off the bench, dribbles in the box and sticks one right in the slot, eh? Play on! RE: Discussion and thoughts - Hollywood PillowPants - 04-10-2009 18:54 (04-10-2009 17:27 )Bob Paradiso Wrote: Are we understood, old boy? Why isn't there an icon for 'biting my tongue'? RE: Discussion and thoughts - StanTheMan - 05-10-2009 01:56 Bob, I’m going to be blunt. Tonight’s direction was awful! For the first time since launching you give us a girl who is ready and willing to entertain. A girl who doesn’t shy away from a little self-relief. A girl who doesn’t bother with any of this silly inner-thigh rubbing or hovering her hand over her crotch, and what do you do? You crush any enthusiasm she has with your over-cautious and self-censoring direction. The cameraman tonight flatly refused to shoot below Carly’s waist whenever her hand strayed in that direction, and if her bottom half was in shot when her hand came into view, he very quickly made sure it didn’t stay that way. How frustrating must it be for your callers when they ask the girl on screen to rub their pussy and thenwatch their hand disappear only for the cameraman not to follow? Have you not been watching Elite and Bangbabes over the last few nights? What you see there is why those channels are the two biggest players and why their girls are never off the phone. I’ll just say this. If your intention is to create a line-up of bored, uninspired girls, who lie about all night doing nothing because they know they’ll only get told to stop if they do - or at least realise that their efforts aren’t going to be shot anyway - then you’re doing a very good job. RE: Discussion and thoughts - Bob Paradiso - 05-10-2009 20:15 (05-10-2009 01:56 )StanTheMan Wrote: Bob, I’m going to be blunt. Tonight’s direction was awful! Stan I'm going to be blunt too. I think you're wrong. The direction was not awful. Cautious? Yes. Careful? Certainly. Paranoid? Insanely so. But with good reason. But not 'awful'. It was smooth, it was well considered, and at times, positively artistic. I thought it looked great. But in terms of content, of grist dare I say it will have left a few of you wondering what the hell old Bob's playing at. Well I have explained in more detail in the day show section but we're on our best behaviour at the moment, and with good bloody reason. I can't really go into more detail here, and nor would I like to frankly. But we have taken your feedback aboard Stan, it's much appreciated. I can only encourage you with a request to watch this space. You're old chum, Bob Paradiso Esq. |