The UK Babe Channels Forum
To be naked or not naked? - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: To be naked or not naked? (/showthread.php?tid=53459)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


RE: To be naked or not naked? - matt celtic bhoy - 30-03-2013 22:39

(30-03-2013 18:29 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  just to clarify, if the show has no pussy then it hardly pass's off as a naked stint for me.

It's discreet nudity.


RE: To be naked or not naked? - Rammyrascal - 31-03-2013 00:39

(27-02-2013 09:32 )terence Wrote:  doesn't matter for me, it's about the girl and the performance.

same for me terence. as ive said before for me nudity is the icing on the cake of a babeshow babe's night and shouldnt be the main factor on whether a babeshow babe has a good night or a bad night


RE: To be naked or not naked? - alwayswanking - 31-03-2013 01:43

(31-03-2013 00:39 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  
(27-02-2013 09:32 )terence Wrote:  doesn't matter for me, it's about the girl and the performance.

same for me terence. as ive said before for me nudity is the icing on the cake of a babeshow babe's night and shouldnt be the main factor on whether a babeshow babe has a good night or a bad night

But surely you want to see some tits!


RE: To be naked or not naked? - Rammyrascal - 31-03-2013 01:54

of course i want to see tits but thats not my point and not what this thread is about. this thread is about nudity and my point is for me nudity is the icing on the cake and not the main factor for me on if a babeshow babe has a good night or a bad night, unlike some forum members who make their decision on whether a babe has been good or bad purely on whether she has been naked


RE: To be naked or not naked? - alwayswanking - 31-03-2013 01:57

Well they shouldn't do nights if they're not going to get naked


RE: To be naked or not naked? - Snooks - 31-03-2013 02:56

Naked stints with no movement and no variety of positions and poses = 0/10
Naked stints with loads of positions, movement and poses = 10/10

Simples Wink.


RE: To be naked or not naked? - elgar1uk - 02-04-2013 10:18

(31-03-2013 02:56 )snookered147 Wrote:  Naked stints with no movement and no variety of positions and poses = 0/10

I can remember the days when nudity HAD to have no movement. In the theatre for example nudity was allowed so long as that rule was strictly observed. It all changed when Paul Raymond found a way around it.


RE: To be naked or not naked? - mysterion - 06-04-2013 09:59

(02-04-2013 10:18 )elgar1uk Wrote:  I can remember the days when nudity HAD to have no movement.

Yes people are spoilt today and don't appreciate mere nudity any longer, but once that's all there was.


RE: To be naked or not naked? - bob roberts - 06-04-2013 12:05

We have only ourselves to blame. We, the viewers, demand new performances, costumes, set, etc. A ray of hope...what's next?eekBig Grin


RE: To be naked or not naked? - lord chas - 09-04-2013 23:43

(31-03-2013 01:57 )alwayswanking Wrote:  Well they shouldn't do nights if they're not going to get naked

It's not compulsory, so long as they bring the calls in.