+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: Is babestation now worse than s66? (/showthread.php?tid=64331)
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Donkey-OT - 13-07-2015 12:43
BS is a pale shadow of its former self but S66 gets worse on an almost daily basis. So BS wins on a technicality.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - tjl007 - 13-07-2015 14:21
Well Babestation is signing up better babes than Studio 66. Would Babestation have got rid of Jess West I doubt it.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Joey 27 - 13-07-2015 17:34
Either S66 have had a change in policy and are now catering for a different market, or they can't afford to sign up any hot babes and good performers, i just hope BS don't start signing up too many more models like Lynda Leigh and Levi because then they will end up like RLC and S66
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - jimmyt73 - 13-07-2015 18:16
Depends what platform you have,Studio 66 is ahead on Sky and since March BS are only really catering for Freeview customers,especially since dropping their Dutch license on Sky,but continuing to pointlessly advertise Freeview stronger content,however S66 also seem to have trouble holding on to the better babes,leading to daybabes who have no inclination towards night filling in on nights,in summary BS has a better rosta but withholds stronger content from Sky and S66 has a heavily biassed daybabe rosta leading to poor quality nightshows and of course very nervous producers,so in my opinion neither has had a great year and are as bad as each other,although i will give credit to S66 because their output is available online for non Sky viewers.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - lovethedaybabes - 13-07-2015 18:21
No. Purely on the basis that babestation has a better roster of stars.
Also elaborating on the points being made on the awfulness of the shows right now, I feel that there is a cycle to these shows. They get really good and then pretty poor and then good again. However, what is missing from this cycle at the moment is the dawning of new and serious competition (SinTV and XXXpanded are just not good enough.)
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Black Cat - 13-07-2015 18:25
No, because Mica is on Babestation.
And she's on tonight!!!
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Snooks - 25-03-2017 13:01
In visual stimulus terms at present this feels a bit like asking whether a chocolate teapot is worse than an inflatable dartboard.
They are both equally inept imo.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - greenray - 25-03-2017 17:12
S66 simply have a better roster of babes,IMHO,and have had for quite awhile. However,they are often let down by scaredy cat camera work,and favouritism toward some babes.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Tori Lee Addict - 26-12-2017 09:42
This is all a matter of opinion really as we all prefer certain babes on certain channels when it comes to studio66 and babestation and all depends on what line up/roster you prefer
To be fair neither of them are as good as they used to be and are so tame in comparison to their former selves. I think that Babestation has better nighshows and studio66 has better dayshows. I very rarely find myself watching a studio66 nightshow, may watch the odd Lucy Zara stint but that is about it
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - ryuken - 26-12-2017 10:34
S66 have been better than BS this year.
Fernanda Ferrari's 2nd camera angle daytime shows.
Rebecca More and Stella Cox's 2-4-1 show.
Lola Knight's nude show.
Cara Brett's night shows.
Rebecca Kelly's tease shows.
Caty Cole's return to night shows.