+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - davy crockett - 04-07-2010 13:39
(03-07-2010 14:22 )BabeBanger Wrote:(03-07-2010 13:57 )Davy Crockett Wrote: Bang Babes will be back! Some of their technical staff left because they were poached by Bluebird, so they have had a load of problems because of that, but they will be back good and strong before long. The Bang future is bright!
No technical staff have been or will be poached by Bluebird. We have a very tight crew that we are very happy with. All our staff are sensible enough to know not to move to Bluebird. If Anyone was to leave us it would be our decision and due to them not being up to the technical level we require.
I apologise if I upset the applecart in any way, but my source for that information has proven to be reliable in the past.
Anyway, the intention was to make a positive post, because I know that Bang Babes have got a lot of plans for the future.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - chrislatimer - 04-07-2010 14:45
*waits with baited breath for said plans*
it will hinge on keeping lori and keeping natasha i forget her surname they with emily dean are your all stars
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 04-07-2010 15:53
(04-07-2010 14:45 )chrislatimer Wrote: *waits with baited breath for said plans*Well i would have put Jemma J on that list , but now she has stated that she is leaving that's not relevant , but one girl i thought was really good and looks like being a real star of the babe channels is "Megan Cox" the girl that did a few of the 18 and keen shows , she did some really great stand out performances on that show , don't know if she is still contracted to Bangmedia but if she is they should try their best to keep hold of her as it looks like she will be a girl every babe channel will want to sign up .
it will hinge on keeping lori and keeping natasha i forget her surname they with emily dean are your all stars
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - XcitedTV - 04-07-2010 16:33
(04-07-2010 15:53 )mr mystery Wrote:(04-07-2010 14:45 )chrislatimer Wrote: *waits with baited breath for said plans*Well i would have put Jemma J on that list , but now she has stated that she is leaving that's not relevant , but one girl i thought was really good and looks like being a real star of the babe channels is "Megan Cox" the girl that did a few of the 18 and keen shows , she did some really great stand out performances on that show , don't know if she is still contracted to Bangmedia but if she is they should try their best to keep hold of her as it looks like she will be a girl every babe channel will want to sign up .
it will hinge on keeping lori and keeping natasha i forget her surname they with emily dean are your all stars
Megan will be back on Bang Babes very soon for your enjoyment.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 04-07-2010 21:04
(03-07-2010 17:05 )BabeBanger Wrote:(03-07-2010 16:56 )Rammyrascal Wrote:(03-07-2010 16:38 )Broncobilly Wrote: has Dionne left?
not yet. but when dionne went to elite last year she said she was only staying on the shows for another year and if this is still right then dionne will be gone by end of the year
As far as Bang Media are concerned Dionne is still a Bang Babe and under contract with us.
hi Babebanger, when will Dionne be back on screen? cheers
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - muttley - 06-07-2010 01:25
Jet was doing her routine on 959 and just went dead switched over to 948
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 06-07-2010 12:39
(06-07-2010 01:25 )muttley Wrote: Jet was doing her routine on 959 and just went dead switched over to 948Jet was not on Bangbabes last night , what you saw on channel 959 was a recording from jet's last Friday night show , the same goes for Jemma that was also a recording , it states in the small print on screen that the girl on screen is not live , or words to that effect .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - brit100 - 06-07-2010 20:54
(06-07-2010 12:39 )mr mystery Wrote:(06-07-2010 01:25 )muttley Wrote: Jet was doing her routine on 959 and just went dead switched over to 948that was also a recording , it states in the small print on screen that the girl on screen is not live , or words to that effect .
Is that the same small print which states that there maybe a 15 second delay between the call and the tv picture. That part of the small print to me suggests that its live, which we know it isnt.
They need to sort this out before they get stung.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 06-07-2010 21:31
on now Dionne channel 959, live or recording anyone?
or do we seem to get lots of Donna these days and not as much of anyone else?
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 06-07-2010 22:28
(06-07-2010 20:54 )brit100 Wrote:It looks to me like tonight they are using the same OSG's and small print that they use for the live shows and have probably made a mistake , on previous nights when recordings are being shown roughly in the middle of the small print of the OSG's there is this message "This is a commercial presentation. You will not be connected to the girl on screen". This is clearly missing from tonight's recorded show , unless it's live of course .(06-07-2010 12:39 )mr mystery Wrote:(06-07-2010 01:25 )muttley Wrote: Jet was doing her routine on 959 and just went dead switched over to 948that was also a recording , it states in the small print on screen that the girl on screen is not live , or words to that effect .
Is that the same small print which states that there maybe a 15 second delay between the call and the tv picture. That part of the small print to me suggests that its live, which we know it isnt.
They need to sort this out before they get stung.