+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Hall Of Fame (/forumdisplay.php?fid=359)
+---- Thread: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=80446)
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - verybadroger - 15-12-2025 20:53
I think I prefer a knock-out format for the HoF. The winner will have come through multiple match-ups against a number of performers.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Snooks - 15-12-2025 20:54
On a separate note I would like to offer my thanks to Charlemagne and lovebabes56 for running this. Nobody knows better than I how difficult running any comp is.
A wide variety of stumbling blocks and complications can emerge for a myriad of reasons. There is a reason why I stopped running comps some years ago and haven't looked back. I hope you can reconsider your position on running comps though Charle.
I have no doubt whatever that your decision making along with lovebabes56 has been in good faith and I wish you both well.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Doddle - 15-12-2025 21:32
(15-12-2025 19:36 )Snooks Wrote: A reminder of the draw created.Imma take Snooks' work for granted
Nicole Snow (1) v Lynda Leigh (6) and Lucy Zara (6)
Beth Bennett (3) v Lucy Summers (4) and Lolly Badcock (6)
Sophia Lares (2) v Dionne Daniels (5) and Ella Jolie (6)
Honey Scott (2) v Sophia Knight (4) and Sophie Hart (6)
So the logical resolution to this would be to have a round of run-offs (in which #5-12) face each other, then play #1-4 in the next round AND SO ON.
OMIGOD ONE EXTRA ROUND FOR CLARITY'S SAKE WE CAN'T HAVE THAT CAN WE?
I mean, I didn't want to run this thing, but that's partly because I trusted that a pretty ordinary riddle finish like this could be resolved without NEEDLESSLY BALLSING it up
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Goodfella3041 - 15-12-2025 22:05
(15-12-2025 20:54 )Snooks Wrote: A wide variety of stumbling blocks and complications can emerge for a myriad of reasons…
That sentence reminded me of PaigeMorganGate in 2020.
That time when it was a dead heat between Paige Philips and Electra Morgan … but one guy voted for “Paige Morgan”, which left everyone scratching their heads lol
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - crankshaft - 15-12-2025 22:10
(15-12-2025 22:05 )Goodfella3041 Wrote:(15-12-2025 20:54 )Snooks Wrote: A wide variety of stumbling blocks and complications can emerge for a myriad of reasons…
That sentence reminded me of PaigeMorganGate in 2020.
That time when it was a dead heat between Paige Philips and Electra Morgan … but one guy voted for “Paige Morgan”, which left everyone scratching their heads lol
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Snooks - 15-12-2025 22:10
In that case my Lord I vote for
Lucy Leigh
Beth Badcock
Ella Daniels
and
Sophie Scott
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - crankshaft - 15-12-2025 22:12
(15-12-2025 20:54 )Snooks Wrote: On a separate note I would like to offer my thanks to Charlemagne and lovebabes56 for running this. Nobody knows better than I how difficult running any comp is.
A wide variety of stumbling blocks and complications can emerge for a myriad of reasons. There is a reason why I stopped running comps some years ago and haven't looked back. I hope you can reconsider your position on running comps though Charle.
I have no doubt whatever that your decision making along with lovebabes56 has been in good faith and I wish you both well.
seconded. Well said
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Boomerangutangangbang - 15-12-2025 23:02
(15-12-2025 11:14 )Charlemagne Wrote: I've gone through the spreadsheet and there are two columns for Clara. There's been such a large number of girls nominated there was always a chance of problems.
She's been added to the next slot. And all voters will be given the chance to amend.
Strike 3. As this witch hunt has continued, so I have decided to stop doing all competitions that I am involved with.
Didn't see this post,
Not a witch hunt in any shape or form, you aint no witch, although I can't be sure about lovebabes56
We all appreciate the work involved, I doubt anyone could've done better given the tools you've had to work with, you've been hamstrung by the format that's all.
Really hope you reconsider.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - winsaw - 16-12-2025 02:05
Running forum votes is not easy I know from experience, out the blue something can happen and yourself being accused of fixing votes lol been there done that don't want to do it again lol,
I don't believe the two guys running this have anything but good intentions, they have made one error and not put in the initial rules a means of splitting up a tiebreak, for next year just copy something like I do in my votes it works,
With all that said I think they have made the best of a bad situation as I would be more disappointed to have seen a rule change mid comp,
I hope both people involved keep running comps
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 16-12-2025 05:30
I'm very much in Charles' debt in running this - he has been a constant source of advice and help when needed, and like I said before, I'd completely forgotten I'd been doing this one for 10 years until he mentioned it!!
I started my involvement with forum awards/comps with the Queen of St66 awards and at the time, I also felt the forum need to honour the girls overall in a better way, and I think that's when I first mooted a HOF. Little did I know!!
Since the St66 awards ended, I concentrated more on this one and hope to remain completely focused on this one.
Like many of you, I hope Charle will reconsider his decision.
I do feel the setup I have now works well for me - and hopefully It'll continue in this way and I feel if it can be improved we will look at it at some point at the right time after the competition is over and the inductions have formally taken place. And as I said before, our HOF is probably unique compared to the more - shall we say - mainstream HOF's - as ours is based on the members of this forum having a say.