(01-05-2019 22:28 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Goodness me, this why i and many other fans can't stand Liverpool fans, arrogant and deluded beyond belief, btw the last time you won the first division my team Luton were in the first division, and for the best part of the last 25 years we have been in the wilderness, but we have now just been promoted back to the championship

Liverpool fans still seem to think they are one of, if not the biggest club in the world, but even Spurs and Westham have bigger stadiums than you now

Liverpool fans on talksport are cracking me up right now

(02-05-2019 00:26 )GreenMachine Wrote:  Doesn't John Henry own two clubs Boston Red Sox being one of them in the US-must have a bit of dosh to spare to buy Liverpool and he has bought wisely I think, we needed to and Van Dijk has just about repaid his phenomenally expensive sum. Salah was wasted at Chelsea and now flourishing at Liverpool. Look how much Man Utd paid for their new players plus an Arsenal reject and how they've paid them back in kind-and they want to pay over the odds for the likes of Gareth Bale! Yes we paid silly money but in the end they've more than paid it back. What worries me is losing Salah, Mané etc maybe in a few years time, but by then hopefully we will be able to attract some good players again to Liverpool.

(02-05-2019 01:17 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 00:11 )babefan2012 Wrote:  

(01-05-2019 23:57 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Just because you don't have a Arab or a Russian owner doesn't mean you aren't spending loads of money, anyway City haven't spent £75 million on a defender and £60 million on a keeper have they, but of course Liverpool are a "real, honest club" aren't they so its fine for them to spend silly money on players

Where would you be now if you had the budgets that the likes of Spurs and Newcastle have? they have similar sized fanbases to you, you've won 2 trophies in 13 years, that's one more trophy than Spurs. Wigan, Birmingham and Portsmouth have won

Big big difference with what we’ve spent and what City and Chelski have in the past. There’s have come from nowhere, ours from selling players primarily and not just the top ones. Also champions league money, top four PL money. Yeah we bought VVD for 75m and Alisson for 60m but it was covered mainly from the Coutinho sell.

Taking into account all of that we’re nowhere near in the same boat as City or what Chelsea were. Yeah we’ve spent more than Tottenham and Newcastle but TBH so have Bournemouth and countless others. City may not have spent 75 or 60m on a player but they bought 3 fullbacks and Goalkeeper for something like 150 odd m the summer before last but that’s fine as it’s only 50odd for each roughly....am I right??

Football is mad, no player is worth the money that’s paid but so by your logic we can’t spend that sort money and still be a real club even though ours didn’t come from a dodgy Russian or a mega rich sheikh but those clubs can and it’s perfectly fine for them to do soo??......

At least the likes of Man City, United and Chelsea have won the prem though, you haven't even though you've spent loads of money aswell, the reason City and Chelsea didn't sell their best players to the likes of Barca and Madrid is cos they were winning trophies, of course they were on massive wages aswell, but they could have got just as much or even more money at Barca and Real

Loads of clubs sell their best players for big money, but they still can't afford to go out and buy players for silly money like you can, did Monaco spend £40 million on a player when they sold Fabinho to you, did Southampton spend £100 million on new players when they sold half their team to you and a few other players to other clubs?

(01-05-2019 21:49 )Carl-Gen X Wrote:  3-0 result is the biggest travesty I’ve ever seen. They were clinical and we weren’t. We should be coming back with at worst a 3-2 result.

That said though, Klopp made some bad selections tonight, Wijnaldum put in the kind of performance I was afraid he would put in, albeit in an unfamiliar role, and putting Gomez in ahead of Trent was a big mistake.

Oh and Suarez can fuck right off. He deserves dog’s abuse in the second leg. Shithouse rat.

(02-05-2019 00:54 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 00:00 )babefan2012 Wrote:  

(01-05-2019 22:28 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Goodness me, this why i and many other fans can't stand Liverpool fans, arrogant and deluded beyond belief, btw the last time you won the first division my team Luton were in the first division, and for the best part of the last 25 years we have been in the wilderness, but we have now just been promoted back to the championship

Liverpool fans still seem to think they are one of, if not the biggest club in the world, but even Spurs and Westham have bigger stadiums than you now

Liverpool fans on talksport are cracking me up right now

Mate, respectfully.....and with the most sincerity....piss off. Last time I checked having a bigger stadium didn’t actually make anyone a bigger club then anyone else....

Best of luck in championship next season, I have a feeling you may need it. Oh and enjoy a boring procession Premier League season next year, I mean who likes title races when a non plastic non sheikh backed club could win it??....

Last time i checked this is a forum not a Liverpool fan site, you seem to have a pop at fanboys on here when they defend their favourite babeshow girls, so don't be a hypocrite now that i have criticised your beloved overrated club, are you even from Liverpool btw? how about supporting your local club, so many people from my area support Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd, its fine when you are like 10, not when you are grown men

(02-05-2019 12:24 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Half of Liverpool's fanbase are glory hunting southerners just like Man Utd and Chelsea fans are, only difference is they have have won more in the past 2 decades than Liverpool, i really don't know how you still call yourself a huge club, my team Luton won the league cup in 1988, just two years before Liverpool's last league title win, im 33 and im not old enough to remember it

Fair enough you still compete at the top end of the prem league, but so do Spurs and people call them a much smaller club, even though they have a bigger stadium than you now, most fans think their club is bigger than they think, even my own team fans wear rose tinted specs at times

(01-05-2019 23:57 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Just because you don't have a Arab or a Russian owner doesn't mean you aren't spending loads of money, anyway City haven't spent £75 million on a defender and £60 million on a keeper have they, but of course Liverpool are a "real, honest club" aren't they so its fine for them to spend silly money on players

Where would you be now if you had the budgets that the likes of Spurs and Newcastle have? they have similar sized fanbases to you, you've won 2 trophies in 13 years, that's one more trophy than Spurs. Wigan, Birmingham and Portsmouth have won

(02-05-2019 12:24 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Half of Liverpool's fanbase are glory hunting southerners just like Man Utd and Chelsea fans are, only difference is they have have won more in the past 2 decades than Liverpool, i really don't know how you still call yourself a huge club, my team Luton won the league cup in 1988, just two years before Liverpool's last league title win, im 33 and im not old enough to remember it

Fair enough you still compete at the top end of the prem league, but so do Spurs and people call them a much smaller club, even though they have a bigger stadium than you now, most fans think their club is bigger than they think, even my own team fans wear rose tinted specs at times