The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150)
+--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281

RE: Babestation XTREME - misterG - 17-04-2010 11:04

(17-04-2010 10:01 )Rogerbee Wrote:  It's still £5 VIP right now, but, when it does go up to £10 do they think that everyone that has been paying that will love it enough by then to want to pay more? I hope they get the answer they want, I really do. I also find it interesting that when Michelle mentions her porn, she says to type her into a search engine, it's like she knows we can find better stuff than she does for Xtreme.

She does, and so do the vast majority of viewers.
But I don't really see the money as the problem - £5 or £10, guys wills pay for it if they think its worth it, and that depends on who's on and what they're allowed to do (ok the false advertising is wrong but I assume they've given themselves a bedding in period and once the show format is settled will probably increase the price, so they've put the £10 on to save later complaints about hiking the price - trouble is I have to assume it because BS won't tell us).
I don't even think hardcore or explicit come into it that much - I'd pay for Morgans website stuff if they were to show it or maybe even a 3 hour repeat of a classic partypeople show if it had cara, morgan, cherri, hannah emma etc.
The problem is that we don't know.
They expect us to pay when we don't know whats on, not because we do - thats just wrong.
You wouldn't buy anything else under those circumstances so why is a babeshow any different?
Infact in any other situation it would be considered a scam and the same judgement should apply here.
What is the problem with honesty and informed choice? EVERY other pay for view channel does it so why are BS so special?
I reckon they're pretty close to the edge here: misleading advertsing & trade description - they may find this taken out of their hands if trading standards were to look in this direction.

RE: Babestation XTREME - Rogerbee - 17-04-2010 11:19

Good points well made. If the content continues to be like it was on launch night then interest will dwindle once everyone's curiosity has been satisfied. I already have a better collection of GG porn that is more explicit than any we're likely to get here. Is BS Xtreme a possible replacement for Sexstation? Same girls doing the same things isn't it!?

RE: Babestation XTREME - admiral decker - 17-04-2010 11:46

(17-04-2010 09:18 )misterG Wrote:  He's been part of this post since 28/2 and has been aware of all the conjecture from the start. As the self appointed representative of Babestation he could at any time have quashed the incorrect assumptions and told us what was going to be provided - but instead he's allowed the conjecture to grow into expectation unchecked - and that at very least makes him culpable. Allowing someone to believe a lie when you know its not true, is the same as telling it.

You can hardly expect channels to come on here and comment on every bit of speculation and conjecture going. If they did they would only have to miss one item and you'd claim that they had confirmed it by not quashing it. The simple fact is that as soon as they were ready they started a thread and told everyone what was going on. If you chose to imagine other things in the meantime that was your own choice, so in future simply make sure you learn your lesson and don't believe anything until you get an official announcement.

RE: Babestation XTREME - Sooky™ - 17-04-2010 12:21

Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Think about it - if this channel was to take off and they were to make loads of money off of it, then surely other channels would follow suit and do likewise (but obviously with their own slant on it to make it appear like they haven't just nicked the format Wink)

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels Wink

RE: Babestation XTREME - hewart - 17-04-2010 12:52

I thought it wa going back to old sexstation way of a normal show to start with and when it goes encripted, full nude pussys showing and full on pussy eating, i only watched the first night and there was no pussy eating or anthing like that apart from when i saw Rio play/rub Tammy's pussey which was good but with all the hype i was expecting a lot more, some proper g/g at least and maybe some hardcore b/g. has ther been any of that?Big Grin

RE: Babestation XTREME - Winston Wolfe - 17-04-2010 13:04

(17-04-2010 12:21 )Sooky Wrote:  Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Think about it - if this channel was to take off and they were to make loads of money off of it, then surely other channels would follow suit and do likewise (but obviously with their own slant on it to make it appear like they haven't just nicked the format Wink)

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels Wink

Ideas are cheap and execution is everything... Most people can come up with ideas, but no idea works without good planning, direction and the right marketing strategy.

The best TV networks don't ask the public to provide these things... They just invest in the right people with talent to do the job.

"Too many Chiefs and not enough Indians" springs to mind...

RE: Babestation XTREME - asti316 - 17-04-2010 13:07

Does any1 else feel sorry for the people that watch normal Babestation, praying for the babes to slip out of their underwear when it's all on show on another channel?

RE: Babestation XTREME - chrislatimer - 17-04-2010 13:11

(17-04-2010 13:07 )asti316 Wrote:  Does any1 else feel sorry for the people that watch normal Babestation, praying for the babes to slip out of their underwear when it's all on show on another channel?

a little bit, but the quality of the babestation xtreme porn is so tame.

and this channel i think will fail, am not being edgy or conterversial. i geniunely believe that unless they add more of the glamour bs girls to it. people will see it for what it is.

babestation.tv on your television sets.

and babestation.tv also has picture sets. and works out a lot cheaper then paying a 5 spot a night to watch bs xtreme

RE: Babestation XTREME - admiral decker - 17-04-2010 13:56

(17-04-2010 12:21 )Sooky Wrote:  Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels Wink

Yes you are the only one.

The incentive to continue with free to air channels comes from the fact that there are always plenty of casual callers who ring into these shows and you can only capture that market by being free to air. Casual callers who flick through the channels once a month are not going to pay to see anything, as they are probably not going to watch for very long anyway.

When Ofcom wanted all the babe channels to encrypt all their broadcasts what did they do? They hired lawyers to fight Ofcom and make every effort to stay free to air - what does that tell you?

Any channel that withdrew their free to air channels would simply be handing the business to one of their rivals.

RE: Babestation XTREME - babestation - 17-04-2010 14:48

(17-04-2010 00:10 )Sooky Wrote:  So if it only costs £5 per night as is now being said, why does the official website have a crossed out £10 and state that £5 is the introductory offer - therefore not a permanant price?

Otherwise it is false advertisement to make it appear people are getting a reduced price when it is infact the standard price

Otherwise, peoples points about it costing £10 are correct Wink

[Image: bsx.jpg]

I didn't say the £5 was permanent, again just people speculating and others believing everything they read on here, apart from if it comes from me.. but what do i know hey