+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 08-07-2010 11:08
I have to be honest and say that i quite like the repeats , in fact some are better than the live shows . Contrary to what "BabeBanger" says about the company having no problems and are in fact growing it is obvious Bangmedia are having problems recruiting girls and tech staff to run more channels , so it makes sense to show repeats for a time . PS , i wonder if they can get away with showing some of the shows that have a few of the girls slipping , after all it's not live and full frontal nudity is allowed on recorded shows , the Amanda and Jemma 2-4-1s perhaps lol .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - XcitedTV - 08-07-2010 11:31
(08-07-2010 11:08 )mr mystery Wrote: I have to be honest and say that i quite like the repeats , in fact some are better than the live shows . Contrary to what "BabeBanger" says about the company having no problems and are in fact growing it is obvious Bangmedia are having problems recruiting girls and tech staff to run more channels , so it makes sense to show repeats for a time . PS , i wonder if they can get away with showing some of the shows that have a few of the girls slipping , after all it's not live and full frontal nudity is allowed on recorded shows , the Amanda and Jemma 2-4-1s perhaps lol .
Once again to all of you. We have no tech or girl problems at all.
We have a great full tech team and a very very strong group of girls who are all amazing and very much loved by all at Bang and vice versa.
Your magic 8 ball logic is grossly flawed so please can you all refrain from speculating. Lets leave the running of our shows to us the professionals.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - stilettos - 08-07-2010 11:58
Ok, but perhaps while you ARE showing the odd repeat,could we put in some requests,like re runs of classic Vikki Valentine,or Holly James when she was blonde,all from about 4 years ago!
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - chrislatimer - 08-07-2010 11:59
(08-07-2010 11:31 )BabeBanger Wrote:(08-07-2010 11:08 )mr mystery Wrote: I have to be honest and say that i quite like the repeats , in fact some are better than the live shows . Contrary to what "BabeBanger" says about the company having no problems and are in fact growing it is obvious Bangmedia are having problems recruiting girls and tech staff to run more channels , so it makes sense to show repeats for a time . PS , i wonder if they can get away with showing some of the shows that have a few of the girls slipping , after all it's not live and full frontal nudity is allowed on recorded shows , the Amanda and Jemma 2-4-1s perhaps lol .
Once again to all of you. We have no tech or girl problems at all.
We have a great full tech team and a very very strong group of girls who are all amazing and very much loved by all at Bang and vice versa.
Your magic 8 ball logic is grossly flawed so please can you all refrain from speculating. Lets leave the running of our shows to us the professionals.
professionals hahaha love it.
any "live" show which runs reruns is not professional
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - amandasnumerounofan - 08-07-2010 12:01
Babebanger, if what you say is true, then what is with the re-runs, tele-shopping adverts and 1 girl covering multiple channels
When that is what is being shown and a new rival is coming to town, there is bound to be speculations. Just wondering what happened with Dannii and Lucy last night?
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 08-07-2010 14:25
(08-07-2010 11:31 )BabeBanger Wrote:Lighten up BabeBanger , this forum is partly about people speculating and voicing their opinions about what they perceive to be happening on the shows whether it be good or bad . If what every one posted on here was based on pure logic it would be a bloody boring forum , so please lets have discussions and speculation , after all we don't want this forum resembling another forum run by a feathery thing that flies over the white cliffs of Dover do we ?(08-07-2010 11:08 )mr mystery Wrote: I have to be honest and say that i quite like the repeats , in fact some are better than the live shows . Contrary to what "BabeBanger" says about the company having no problems and are in fact growing it is obvious Bangmedia are having problems recruiting girls and tech staff to run more channels , so it makes sense to show repeats for a time . PS , i wonder if they can get away with showing some of the shows that have a few of the girls slipping , after all it's not live and full frontal nudity is allowed on recorded shows , the Amanda and Jemma 2-4-1s perhaps lol .
Once again to all of you. We have no tech or girl problems at all.
We have a great full tech team and a very very strong group of girls who are all amazing and very much loved by all at Bang and vice versa.
Your magic 8 ball logic is grossly flawed so please can you all refrain from speculating. Lets leave the running of our shows to us the professionals.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Xpressio - 08-07-2010 16:47
On TV evidence, with re-runs, the chat line and shopping adverts Bangbabes definatley seem to be just about hanging on in there. From a company who were leading the way not so long ago to this must mean they have troubles.
But I dont think they can bring in new faces until things settle down with Bluebird, I think most who can challenge Bluebird will try (which will make things interesting) and the others, whats left of them will wait in vein.
If Bluebird are as successful as they are aggressive I cant see Bangbabes getting back on track as they once were, best thing they could hope for would be to look for some Bluebird drop outs in the coming months. In football terms, Leeds Utd!
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 08-07-2010 20:25
(04-07-2010 21:04 )Broncobilly Wrote:(03-07-2010 17:05 )BabeBanger Wrote:(03-07-2010 16:56 )Rammyrascal Wrote:(03-07-2010 16:38 )Broncobilly Wrote: has Dionne left?
not yet. but when dionne went to elite last year she said she was only staying on the shows for another year and if this is still right then dionne will be gone by end of the year
As far as Bang Media are concerned Dionne is still a Bang Babe and under contract with us.
hi Babebanger, when will Dionne be back on screen? cheers
(06-07-2010 23:24 )mr mystery Wrote: Well they are now showing a recording of Donna on 959 and at the same time she is live on 902 wearing a different outfit , unless she has got a twin sister of course .
come on babebanger, please answer my question
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 08-07-2010 20:35
Yes BabeBanger i also want to know if Dionne will ever be back on screen "LIVE". Also just been watching Lilly Roma on channel 959 and it has taken me 30mins to realise she is actually live , well i think she is , so please make it clear if the girl on screen is live or if it is a recording , viewers and callers are getting confused .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - TammysNo1Fan - 08-07-2010 20:51
(08-07-2010 12:01 )amandasnumerounofan Wrote: . Just wondering what happened with Dannii and Lucy last night?
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=12815&pid=564567#pid564567