+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Caty Cole (/forumdisplay.php?fid=280)
+---- Thread: Caty Cole - Queen of Babestation (Nights) 2020 - Chat & Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=61116)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 16-02-2019 01:15
She should grow a bush, then she can do what Scarlett is allowed to do
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 16-02-2019 01:42
Not fashionable these days darn it! Still she knows how to entertain us and looks very good.
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 16-02-2019 10:45
(14-02-2019 17:57 )mrmann Wrote: ^ Agreed about the POV, nude of course and unblurred.
More hand thong, more standing nude ala Scarlett/Atlanta/Valentina.
Caty is a legend!
Agree Caty is a babeshow legend & the Scottish Pocket Rocket was on fine form indeed last night looking great in her lingerie
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - Rogergilford54 - 16-02-2019 23:21
Wanking time boys & girls Caty’s on
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 16-02-2019 23:41
I appreciate that she is probably petite in real life - but is there some kind of contractual arrangement by which Caty Cole must always filmed from further away than any other performer on BS to further emphasize this characteristic ?
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 17-02-2019 00:43
^ Exactly. Camera is 15 feet away almost and she's still being careful not to show too much. I think she's censoring herself, not the other way around. Compare her session now to Ashley's from last night, or Scarlett's sessions, and they are drastically different. A month back Caty even asked the cameraman to move the camera all the way to the right, away from her backside, which she often asked for at Studio 66 as well.
It's terrific to see Caty on TV again, but I was hoping for a bit more of what the other women do. She's surprisingly tame compared almost everyone else on Babestation.
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - Rogergilford54 - 17-02-2019 03:01
Have to save another load for the lovely Miss Cole later on
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 17-02-2019 09:36
(16-02-2019 23:41 )M-L-L Wrote: I appreciate that she is probably petite in real life - but is there some kind of contractual arrangement by which Caty Cole must always filmed from further away than any other performer on BS to further emphasize this characteristic ?"Ye canna break the laws of physics, Cap'n!"
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 23-02-2019 01:01
Would love a nude POV with bum angles from her...
RE: Caty Cole - Babestation Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 23-02-2019 14:32
(17-02-2019 09:36 )Doddle Wrote:(16-02-2019 23:41 )M-L-L Wrote: I appreciate that she is probably petite in real life - but is there some kind of contractual arrangement by which Caty Cole must always filmed from further away than any other performer on BS to further emphasize this characteristic ?"Ye canna break the laws of physics, Cap'n!"
No, Scotty, but they could move closer towards the warp core, they don't need to be all the way back at the other side of the engine room.