+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 28-03-2012 19:01
I think Addison does indeed work for Ofcom
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - The Truth - 28-03-2012 19:19
Control the banks,you control the world,Control the oil,you control nations,Control the food,you control the people. H.Kissinger
Democracy is not a option it is a rite,don't live your life on your knees,die on your feet.
Fight for what you believe no matter how small.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - The realXFactor - 28-03-2012 21:38
I agree Addison "This is the wrong thread to do it in" - see Krull's origina; post
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - The realXFactor - 28-03-2012 21:44
I agree Addison "This is the wrong thread to do it in" - see Krill's original post
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 28-03-2012 23:04
A vagina is not dangerous, and Ofcom allows them to be shown uncensored half of the time on non adult channels. We want to see a normal female body part for once on the adult channels. Full frontal is fine.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 29-03-2012 00:37
(27-03-2012 03:13 )StanTheMan Wrote: Is there anywhere else this thread can go now?
We've long since established that Ofcom clearly want the Babeshows gone and that they will continue to unfairly target them, but how many ways can we say that? And what are we achieving, exactly?
Every example of inconsistency is helpful, and if people stop posting the examples will become ancient history, therefore easy to dismiss. But I agree with anyone who says it looks quite repetitive.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Gold Plated Pension - 29-03-2012 22:53
(26-03-2012 19:33 )CumbrianTom Wrote: Looking forward to Thursday night, just after 11pm when Film 4 screens Antichrist. Will be interested to see if the channel stays true to form and shows the movie uncut. If that is the case, surely it sets a precedent that the Babechannels will be able to cite if they decide to up the anti and broadcast more explicit material than the guff they give us now. I imagine Ofcom will be hard pressed to hammer Red Light, Babestation, Elite etc, if we've seen Antichrist in it's original format, on a free to air, unencrypted channel which also broadcasts on the Freeview platform.
Film 4 has bottled it and are screening a cut version of the film. Even though it has a start time of 23.20, a verbal warning given with regard to content and the film classified 18 Film 4 are not true to their word on their website.
Film 4's extreme season brings together a selection of upsetting, distinctive and provocative films from some of the worlds most important filmmakers, culminating with an uncut screening of Danish director Lars von Trier's Antichrist.
Your right to be treated as an adult has been removed.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 30-03-2012 00:24
(29-03-2012 22:53 )Gold Plated Pension Wrote: Film 4 has bottled it and are screening a cut version of the film. Even though it has a start time of 23.20, a verbal warning given with regard to content and the film classified 18 Film 4 are not true to their word on their website.
Film 4's extreme season brings together a selection of upsetting, distinctive and provocative films from some of the worlds most important filmmakers, culminating with an uncut screening of Danish director Lars von Trier's Antichrist.
Your right to be treated as an adult has been removed.
Do you know this for certain, GPP? If it's true then I'm going to email them and ask them why they made this statement on their website, and if, in fact, they ever had any intention of screening it uncut.
I'm not interested in the film itself - I think it's a pile of fucking garbage - a complete snoozefest, in fact, but this shouldn't be allowed to happen unchallenged.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 02-04-2012 01:21
Quote:Email and web use 'to be monitored' under new laws
The government will be able to monitor the calls, emails, texts and website visits of everyone in the UK under new legislation set to be announced soon.
Internet firms will be required to give intelligence agency GCHQ access to communications on demand, in real time.
The Home Office says the move is key to tackling crime and terrorism, but civil liberties groups have criticised it.
Tory MP David Davis called it "an unnecessary extension of the ability of the state to snoop on ordinary people".
Attempts by the last Labour government to take similar steps failed after huge opposition, including from the Tories.
Slightly off topic, but in principle this opens the door to answering that question Ofcom dont want answered - how many people use porn?
If it turns out that 90% of the population access hardcore porn on the internet Ofcom can hardly use the old offence argument.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17576745
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 05-04-2012 21:32
Eastbound And Down just ended on SKY 124, and the last scene was of a guy having his pants pulled down by a women, showing his bare ass, and having her stick a dildo in him, with him moving back and forth. BTW, it's not even 11pm.
Well done Ofcon, for not making any fricking sense at all with your rules
Looking forward to your next unwarranted fine against the babe channels for showing even less than this