(08-03-2010 01:58 )aceman65 Wrote:  Caty was gorgeous on that red recliner, but why did the producer get her to change her white lace knickers, and put red one's on instead

I mean what was wrong with them!!!! If Gemma, Hazel, Sophia, Delta and Tommie Jo can get away with wearing totally see-through underwear, that shows everything, Then why ask Caty to change out of a pair that shows nothing.

I mean, where's the continuity in that.

(08-03-2010 10:41 )bombshell Wrote:  Have to say the last two times Hazel has been on she was wearing two pairs,to my annoyance, which when you think of her shower scenes dont make sense,unless they have had some sort of official warning

(08-03-2010 18:15 )Rael 74 Wrote:  Possibly the case Bombshell, an "official" warning from an "unofficial" bunch of tw.......erps.

(08-03-2010 21:48 )aceman65 Wrote:  Well if that was the case, then why allow Gemma the other night to wear totally see-through underwear to the point that you could practically read her lips.

You know the best thing about Caty tonight imo is the fact she has not got those stupidly large false eyelashes on, we can at last see those beautiful eyes how they were meant to be seen once again

Caty's a little belter and looks hot to trot tonight
And on the subject of the girls wearing two pair on knickers.......grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, it's my pet hate If the girl isnt allowed to wear see through or skimpy knickers that run the risk of showing too much why not simply tell her it's no go and get her to wear ones that show nothing Surely that would be better from the outset rather than wearing two pairs which just makes everything look cheap and tacky. I dare say two pairs won't even be that comfortable for the girls