The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 02-09-2022 09:13

I can't remember all the babes that did Page 3 and lads mags, then went onto working on the channels.

But Caitlin Wynters, Gemma Jane, Gemma Massey, Kitty Lea, Alice Goodwin, Hannah Claydon, Charmaine Sinclair are/were great.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - thor - 03-09-2022 19:54

Who's to blame for the dire state of the channels today?

The owners?...... No: they need to make a profit to keep their business viable.

The girls?...... No: they need to earn money - it's their job.

It's the blokes (aka mugs) who spend large sums of money on private shows and the detestable pervcam who are to blame.

As long as these idiots keep chucking credits at the girls, the channels will never improve.

I am also staggered by the lavish compliments these fools pay to girls who would never have got close to an audition for the channels a few years ago when almost all the girls were really attractive and sexy (and tat free!)

Postcript
FTA (I finally worked out what that means, I think - free to air)


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 03-09-2022 22:38

Punters that spend obscene amounts on buzzes and calls, are no different than punters that spend obscene amounts on privates and pervcam.

The channels and babes are always going to cater their product and services to the small handful of punters that spend £10,000+ per month.

Rather than the punters that watch FTA online, beg for stuff in the chatbox and barely spend any money. Capitalism makes the world go round.



We've just got to accept the the channels in 2032 will change again and find another gimmick (VR or sex dolls) that punters will pay for.

Just like how they're different from their 2002 (Satellite and calls).

2012 (Freeview, satellite, online, calls and texts).

And 2022 (Freeview, satellite, online, calls, VIP members, Mr P shows, BS merchandise, pervcam, private cam and vibetoys) versions.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 04-09-2022 03:04

The VR part I would say probably could happen before we reach 2032
I think babe channels on Freeview channels will be a thing of the past by the end of 2025


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RyanTheMan - 18-09-2022 21:10

Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger. What a sad state of affairs. Remember when the babeshow girls were beautiful and had figures you wish your wife or girlfriend had? Well I'm glad my size 10 wife is slimmer than these four. Staying in shape used to be a prerequisite for being a successful glamour model. No longer apparently.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Nudges_Malone - 18-09-2022 21:50

(18-09-2022 21:10 )RyanTheMan Wrote:  Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger. What a sad state of affairs. Remember when the babeshow girls were beautiful and had figures you wish your wife or girlfriend had? Well I'm glad my size 10 wife is slimmer than these four. Staying in shape used to be a prerequisite for being a successful glamour model. No longer apparently.

I honestly wouldn't go that low on a night out. 6 pints in or not. These girls aren't fit.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - The tiny giant - 20-09-2022 23:05

(17-08-2022 11:57 )ryuken Wrote:  Mikkaela said in her chatbox that she's finishing her show early.

It must be hard for her seeing punters watching her show for free, but not spending any money.
But the babes forget that the channel that they work for pay them per show its the add ons bonus that these babes want


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - thor - 25-09-2022 20:05

None of the Valkyries are size 14.

Maybe I'll get them to swoop down on the channels one night and let them "strut their stuff" as they say in Valhalla.

Just one snag: they need to return with the soul of a dead hero.

Any volunteers?


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - thor - 01-10-2022 17:19

No takers? I thought not.

But that's because you don't know what you're missing.

Okay, you have to fight a battle every day in Valhalla and get killed, sometimes horribly.

But then you get resurrected in the evening and apart from all the feasting and drinking, you get to watch old classic shows from the channels which have been deleted down here on Midgard and, because you're a hero, you can wank yourself silly all night until its time for bed.

Next day - same again!


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - seducedx6 - 01-10-2022 23:13

Although I don't know who were the "Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger.", referred to in post 5685, from 18/09/2022 at 22:10, it would seem that I'm not alone, in not having a problem as such, with women bigger than size (1)0.
There are plenty of stick-thin fashion models to watch, in catwalk/'runway' shows, if you look for them. But like the character in Goodness Gracious Me, the poster evidently already has "better at home".

However, there is what in philosophical terms is called a category mistake, as one of the ways' distinguishing 'glamour girls' historically, is that they've never necessarily been skinny.
I did link a late blogger's post with a wider definition of glamour, in a forum post earlier in the year, but there are plenty of accounts of models' choosing to do 'glamour', because fashion modelling had such a narrow scope.
Albeit that was before the more recent turn towards purportedly 'body positive' fashion, which actually covers the figures of most women.
Plus, I did write about the bimbofication scene, in one or two of my earliest forum posts, a couple years ago.