+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Kingsmind - 23-12-2022 13:15
(23-12-2022 11:23 )winsaw Wrote: It's an interesting final and not the one I would have predicted,
Although Nicole is only on TV once or twice a month nowadays she still dose excellent shows as good as she always has,
Honey on TV twice a week but don't do a lot for me but a lot of people say she's one of the best on the phone, so I guess people voted based on different things that were important to them,
I was surprised like u a few names from bs didn't make it deeper into the contest,
Agree with that Winsaw on Nicole but still the voting should be based on a yearly thing , just because her shows are great doesn't mean she should be in the final because you have to turn up for near enough the hole year to have any chance of winning.
But members see things differently.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Boomerangutangangbang - 23-12-2022 13:46
I think I'm right in saying that Nicole only qualified from the preliminary round into the last 8 as the 7th seed, so made the final ahead of other more fancied babes. That fact that Nicole knocked out Brooks was a bigger surprise to me.
There's no doubt that the babes that do regular shows are at some sort of an advantage, perhaps this is a reason that the top XP babes have featured in the later stages of comp, certainly that's been the case in recent years. The XP babes offer a cheap old-school show without all the BS gimmicks such as buzzes & silly 2-minute clock shows etc. The 2 companies that we are left with now are like chalk & cheese, & I think more than ever fans are either in one camp or the other.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 23-12-2022 14:23
The impact of the recent influx of babes from S66 on BS is an interesting topic of conversation.
It appears that not much has changed in terms of which babes regularly appear in the main TV studio on mornings, afternoons and nights.
The ex-S66 babes seem to be mostly doing shows on BSCams, web room shows, PPV shows and from home shows.
There may be a multitude of economic and personal reasons as to why every babe isn't getting a chance to do a FTA show in MK.
But it would be nice to see BS freshen things up a bit, and take a few creative chances, now that they've monopolized the industry.
My fear is that the quality of FTA content may continue to drop and the prices will increase with new unnecessary gimmicks.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Boomerangutangangbang - 23-12-2022 14:55
I think that one factor that doesn't get talked about enough is the loyalty shown by a company towards employees with years of service behind them. A core of babes given the bulk of shifts at the expense of holding back the next generation of stars. It happens in all walks of life Sport, etc. I've been moved on at work at times when I as clearly doing a better job than others who just had more service.
It's easy to spot at XP, now they have one channel, they seen to have a decent number of babes on their roster, yet they've been down to just one babe on nights quite often this year.
They have to keep their core staff happy, which leaves very little for others to gain the experience to become as good & bring in the money.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 23-12-2022 15:43
BS showing loyalty towards their 10+ years serving babes like Charlie C, Hannah C, Alice, Beth, The Twins etc is understandable.
That's why I've been slightly surprised at how Megan Rox, Amber Paige and April Mae seem to have become the new "faces" of BS ahead of some 5-10 year babes.
They haven't been at BS that long and seem to be in a lot of BS' recent marketing stuff like the NFTs, Daily Star articles and the Friday Night Show.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - thor - 23-12-2022 19:42
I want to vote for Ava Blue, Tiffany Chambers, Bailey Cream, Holly McGuire and Ruby Summers.
Or am I too late?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 23-12-2022 21:59
(23-12-2022 11:01 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: Remember the days when The Twilight Zone was a must read, since I came back here it has averaged 3 spats per year in the last 3 years. I mean what do the mods even do these days,Maybe we're all just placid and easy-going these days?Charle even finds time to knock out some caps.
Nah, that can't be right...
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 25-12-2022 05:05
(23-12-2022 13:46 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: I think I'm right in saying that Nicole only qualified from the preliminary round into the last 8 as the 7th seed, so made the final ahead of other more fancied babes. That fact that Nicole knocked out Brooks was a bigger surprise to me.
In 2013 Lilly Roma qualified as number 7 seed in Ultimate Babe.
She knocked out the number two seed in the quarter finals and beat the number one seed in the final. Lucky number 7 perhaps
.Shows it can be done though.
Nicole knocking out Brooksie is an interesting one.
On the one hand it may be deemed as a surprise by some given that Brooksie won the UK Babe Channels Night award.
However Nicole does have a good track record in Ultimate Babe so in that sense maybe not such a surprise.
The motivation reasoning behind votes may or may not differ from comp to comp whether it be for a specific channel or cross channel.
I could not even begin to speculate as to the reasoning for the deliberations of voters in the various comps.
It's mind bending stuff
.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Jamie's Knight - 25-12-2022 06:59
(25-12-2022 05:05 )Snooks Wrote:(23-12-2022 13:46 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: I think I'm right in saying that Nicole only qualified from the preliminary round into the last 8 as the 7th seed, so made the final ahead of other more fancied babes. That fact that Nicole knocked out Brooks was a bigger surprise to me.
In 2013 Lilly Roma qualified as number 7 seed in Ultimate Babe.
She knocked out the number two seed in the quarter finals and beat the number one seed in the final. Lucky number 7 perhaps
Shows it can be done though.
Nicole knocking out Brooksie is an interesting one.
On the one hand it may be deemed as a surprise by some given that Brooksie won the UK Babe Channels Night award.
However Nicole does have a good track record in Ultimate Babe so in that sense maybe not such a surprise.
The motivation reasoning behind votes may or may not differ from comp to comp whether it be for a specific channel or cross channel.
I could not even begin to speculate as to the reasoning for the deliberations of voters in the various comps.
It's mind bending stuff
Very good points mate.
I've nothing against Honey but am also surprised that she won the overall award. Xpanded is not as accessible as Babestation and they don't even allow caps or vids on here.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Kingsmind - 25-12-2022 13:40
Now it's only BS and XP you will obviously get more XP winners then ever in the Ultimate Babe i mean look S66 only just finished this year and you have already had an XP winner.
As much as people hate S66 on here you can't ignore there track record i mean look how many times they won the Ultimate Babe and retained it to it's unbelievable , because of S66 BS couldn't get a look in so well done to them on that.
In saying that after S66 demise BS still didn't get the title but we will see what happens next year because they have got more chance then ever in winning it next year.