![]() |
Angels TV - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Angels TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=129) +---- Thread: Angels TV (/showthread.php?tid=16115) |
RE: Angels TV - ynot - 17-01-2010 03:14 hahaha, trust me man...if we could ever get Alex and Vikki to do babe channels we would be over the moon......as far as graphics...same as everything else i said....as soon as we got some new numbers there will be new graphics to accompany them... RE: Angels TV - tsurugi - 17-01-2010 03:46 What about getting the awesome Holly D on the show ![]() Might be a little out of your league though RE: Angels TV - simplymarko - 17-01-2010 13:05 message to ynot can you confirm the relationship between you and HV, as you know there is alot of bad feeling on the board towards the HV people. Also in terms of getting new talent, - if you want to win me over try and get Minnie who used to be on BS daytime, Ialso suggest that you recall Kizzy and Ziggy who used to be on HV from whereever they ended up after not being paid! oh and pay Barney and Lilly what they are due and offer them their jobs back also as you advrtising texts, do it properly, i.e read them out get the girls to interact with the audeince RE: Angels TV - thestrange1 - 17-01-2010 13:48 Get some models from here: www.glamourstarslive.com http://www.satanic-sluts.com or just search the streets and social networking sites for totty. RE: Angels TV - schmoo - 17-01-2010 13:51 I think they are doing okay on their own - this Kayleigh lass today also gets my thumbs up. Nice. Another suggestion though.. can we have the girls sitting upright? Don't understand why all the lying down on these channels. I (personally) hate it. RE: Angels TV - thestrange1 - 17-01-2010 14:01 (17-01-2010 13:51 )schmoo Wrote: I think they are doing okay on their own - this Kayleigh lass today also gets my thumbs up. Nice. Not good for posture. I prefer 2,3 or 4 babes at night because 1 babe is just boring. We need some interactivity aswell. How about making the channel widescreen. Also, change the cheerleaders to satanic-s.l.u.t.s without the . RE: Angels TV - rawr1 - 17-01-2010 22:35 (17-01-2010 13:51 )schmoo Wrote: .. can we have the girls sitting upright? Don't understand why all the lying down on these channels. I (personally) hate it. Nooooo! As a leg man, I feel the opposite way ![]() RE: Angels TV - schmoo - 17-01-2010 23:11 rawr1.. i too love legs! But i wish to see them when the ladies' are sitting upright, preferably in a chair. I love to see them being crossed and uncrossed and also together - the teasing knicker flashes that these both create are great! But either way, we also get to see them fully (enough). My comment about lying down is my personal bug bear - i'm a daytime show follower only and it's my preference to see the girls dressed, and sitting upright. So seeing a girl, fully dressed, laying down on a bed all day just doesn't sit (no pun intended!) right with me. In my opinion, leave the laying down for the night show girls where they can sprawl around in underwear/next to nothing, showing all they wish, on a bed - which is there for that precise reason. RE: Angels TV - dogmas2010 - 17-01-2010 23:27 who is the sexy and very gorgeous lady with the amazng body on the channel right now she is amazing Angels TV - Bunna - 18-01-2010 11:10 Is there a webstream for this channel? |