Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Thread: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! (/showthread.php?tid=21247) |
RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - tsurugi - 13-06-2010 23:44 Quote:Emily Dean Kelly and Emily are prob the only two on that list that appeal to me. You need to stop hiring so many ex babestation girls and the average ones at that. If your going to sigh some BS talent go get georgie,camilla or stevie(you fucked up big time when you let her go) For the love of god can we have less Alex Adams and Dionne Mendez talk about overkill and they are not the most exciting of performers to watch....i would rather watch Algeria vs Slovenia again than see those two Oh and while i am here can you please sort out your awful webstream its almost unwatchable in its current state RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - broncobilly10 - 13-06-2010 23:50 (13-06-2010 23:42 )Trickster Wrote: Well like you say mate we all have different taste but i am far from liking any of the Bangbaes girls. all i'm saying is that the bangbabes girls don't deserve the flak they are picking up here cause none of the other channels are doing anything different. to be honest since the likes of lolly and michelle joined babestation i think it dropped like a bomb but yep each to there own RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - chrislatimer - 14-06-2010 00:12 out of list posted previous the only girls i currently or have ever liked are. emily dean lori kelly. lynsey i saw a donna duke alex 2 4 1 the other night and it was like babestation circa 2007. bangbabes is truly 3rd out the big 3 now which is bad considering how bad babestation is these days RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - broncobilly10 - 14-06-2010 00:25 hi chris, out of the other 2 channels, what do you reckon they do better? RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - chrislatimer - 14-06-2010 00:54 babestation is only better because they georgie darby lol only reason. elite does nearly everything better then bangbabes. imo better girls better sets they look a better channel on tv then bangbabes it just seems to be they only seem to go after girls who are unhappy at babestation, elite bring new faces in mica, cali garcia carmen scott to name a few. i was gonna mention how tame bangbabes is but i do know thats due to ofcom so thats not your fault. one thing i actually like , ill finish on a postive note is the stream on their website is the best quality of any channels. id love to watch bangbabes more as i really like emily dean, but the quality tv wise just aint there. bronco do you work for bangmedia btw ? RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - broncobilly10 - 14-06-2010 06:35 no mate i'm just a viewer like most people here, but i like a good debate and want more of an answer than something is just rubbish ha ha. i agree with you re babestation Georgie is great, elite is good the picture quality is better but everything else seems to be the same sets wise all the channels do the one girl one bed deal with the odd office set thingy. RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - Trickster - 14-06-2010 14:24 (13-06-2010 20:38 )Bennyd63 Wrote:(13-06-2010 20:28 )Trickster Wrote: I don't think anyone questioning weather Bangbabes will survive when Bluebirds launches. The point is you look at that least and most of them girls have been around for about 5years or more, If i ran the show the only girls i would keep out of that list are Kelly Carter Adele Emily Scarlette Megan Lynsey Oh and Benny if you do sign any of BS girls which use seem to like doing this would be my choice for NIGHTS only Jessica Rosie Lee Stevie Georgie Megan Thats the only ones at BS worth signing who would do nights RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - Josh187 - 14-06-2010 14:39 To put things simply you need some new fresh faces on Bang Babes - not Ex Babestation rejects. RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - HEX!T - 14-06-2010 16:00 i wouldn't quite put it like that. more along the lines of i wouldn't hire girls that have been given the shu from another channel because there call numbers weren't up to scratch... if they left because they were unhappy and can still bring in the callers then why not. after all just coz you don't like a girl doesn't mean she isn't popular. the biggest surprise for me was lori's move to Bang Babes and what a move that has turned out to be. loads of energy, loads of playfull banter and over all a much better performance. definitely a great move for her. then theres lynsey, her act is more suited to bangbabes she comes off genuinely sexual instead of a cocktease. so no some girls benefit from leaving babestation IMO. RE: Time for some new decent girls signed up!!! - SOCATOA - 14-06-2010 16:10 Always enjoyed BangBabes going back to the halcyon days of Victoria, Viky V, Precious,Asia, etc. Ah those were the days. Just think BB needs more rotation with the girls, oh and lots more Lynsey We need BangBabes on our screens!!! |