+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Where is the proof? (/showthread.php?tid=65605)
RE: Where is the proof? - winsaw - 26-07-2015 17:52
(26-07-2015 17:45 )forumdudedateline='1437932725' Wrote: ^^^When ruby was being fingered or most likely fucked the guy was off screen and couldn't be seen,ofcom wouldn't have a leg to stand on!!
Can't fine a girl for facial expressions and body movement.
They did Dannii Hardwood and RLC for just that, when she was half behind the door, I believe they said you can imply something sexual is going on even if its not seen,
RE: Where is the proof? - Maggot - 26-07-2015 17:52
(26-07-2015 17:48 )wackawoo Wrote: Wasn't someone Donna Duke going out with screwing all and sundry?
He cheated on Donna with Reede Fox, and the two of them kept switching channels to avoid each other.
Don't know if there was anybody else, but if you can pull Donna and Reede why would you stop at just 2?
RE: Where is the proof? - forumdude - 26-07-2015 18:03
(26-07-2015 17:52 )winsaw Wrote:(26-07-2015 17:45 )forumdudedateline='1437932725' Wrote: ^^^When ruby was being fingered or most likely fucked the guy was off screen and couldn't be seen,ofcom wouldn't have a leg to stand on!!
Can't fine a girl for facial expressions and body movement.
They did Dannii Hardwood and RLC for just that, when she was half behind the door, I believe they said you can imply something sexual is going on even if its not seen,
But wasnt the guy seen behind danni and was also pulling her hair while she was in the doggystyle position!! Thats probably were they got done.
Also the danni door sessions were about an hour long and she did afew similar shows,it was like a pov gimmick....the ruby situation was different,she wasn't on handheld and it was less than 10mins,just a quick zoom in and go
RE: Where is the proof? - retah-rotaredom - 26-07-2015 18:08
In my further analysis of that classic Ruby clip, I would conclude that she was probably being licked out, given that she was on the floor and up against the cupboards. In that position the guy would be obliged to do missionary but would find it awkward and uncomfortable, and moreover, hard not to get his head and shoulders in shot. You do see his shadow briefly, then it disappears as he goes down on her in my opinion. I guess we will only know for sure if someone asks Ruby...
Of course staff fuck each other at the channels. Bears shit in woods, the Pope is a Catholic. People fuck all the time at more prosaic workplaces such as offices, hospitals, department stores, warehouses. They sure aren't going to get all prudish on a wankers' channel now are they?
RE: Where is the proof? - setter1000 - 26-07-2015 18:13
^^^^^^^^^^^
that is the point. Someone did ask her if she was being fucked. She said yes. The more sceptical of us are suggesting 'well she would say that wouldn't she'?
It makes the shows more interesting.
RE: Where is the proof? - Goodfella3041 - 26-07-2015 18:18
CSI Las Vegas
CSI Miami
CSI New York
...and not one episode that deals with a forensic examination of shadows and facial expressions on a televised chat line.
Hollywood just doesn't have a clue
RE: Where is the proof? - setter1000 - 26-07-2015 18:24
@goodfella
Tell me about it. If you could get the forum members to investigate who the real jack the ripper was, with the same zeal and analytical skill we would have his real identity by sunset, sunrise the very latest.
RE: Where is the proof? - ShandyHand - 26-07-2015 18:45
^ Kosminski - all day long!
RE: Where is the proof? - setter1000 - 26-07-2015 18:50
(26-07-2015 18:45 )ShandyHand Wrote: ^ Kosminski - all day long!
It all depends on wether you saw the Crime watch documentary or the Michael Caine film.
Joking aside, Is Kosminski the iceman? The gambino family hitman. Or the Jewish butcher which Crime watch claimed.
RE: Where is the proof? - ShandyHand - 26-07-2015 19:01
The Gull theory (used in many films including the Caine one) is a great story but no more than that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Kosminski
Best outlined in this book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/372/dp/0470938994
So many whacky theories out there its hard to keep track but this is the most credible one I've seen in nearly 30 years interest in the case.