+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? (/showthread.php?tid=76652)
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - samtron - 27-04-2019 09:32
Leave the tease shows as they are. Sometimes they better than the night shows.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - Roger Patterson - 01-05-2019 01:31
I think tonight's tease with Jamie Jones was a good indication of why the shows should be left as they are.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - jimmyt73 - 01-05-2019 15:14
5ame issue as ever for me tits out after ten or at the very least towards 10.30 also if no topless intention epg title description and rating should be changed accordingly, as for 4am show tits out,visible through outfit from the start.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - BlastedKeith - 02-05-2019 08:08
Tease shows are completely pointless if nudity is definitively off the menu. You need at least the prospect that you might see something - otherwise it’s like wondering if Wile E Coyote might actually catch the Road Runner.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - Robot Devil - 02-05-2019 09:27
^THIS, every day. That was always the lure when 66 started doing their tease shows - whether it was Danica or whoever else - the reason they captivated us was because you never knew if this was going to be the night when you saw more that before. When you have girls on that you already KNOW won't show more it can't be considered a tease, because.....there is NO tease.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - Glenn Miller - 02-05-2019 12:47
(02-05-2019 08:08 )BlastedKeith Wrote: Tease shows are completely pointless if nudity is definitively off the menu.
You're entitled to your opinion of course, but I don't think Macy's tease shows are pointless.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - ShandyHand - 02-05-2019 13:02
^ Note he said off the menu, not that the babe hasn't done it to date. There's a sense with some babes it will never happen. That has to be somewhat debilitating to the tease factor. A babe can tease in other ways sure but its more limited.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - hornball - 02-05-2019 13:36
(02-05-2019 12:47 )Glenn Miller Wrote:Completely concur! Macy may not be my personal fave, but there is no doubt that she is always willing to 'give it all she's got! In fact, many of the night time babes could learn something from Macy (and others on the tease hours - Jamie jones - for example - is a total knockout). Too many of the night girls now are just going through the motions, not really getting into it at all.(02-05-2019 08:08 )BlastedKeith Wrote: Tease shows are completely pointless if nudity is definitively off the menu.
You're entitled to your opinion of course, but I don't think Macy's tease shows are pointless.
Someone mentioned see through outfits on the early hours tease. That is exactly the route to follow with the tease shows in general, coupled with the best possible interaction. More care needs to be given to who these shows hire, based on their willingness to interact, rather than just their agreement to show more, more often!
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - bigglesworth - 15-05-2019 23:55
I see that tease shows have made it to Babestation now.
RE: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless? - marlowe - 16-05-2019 03:01
I can't say I'm surprised by this development. Besides, it was their idea in the first place.