Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 07-06-2011 14:37 Does anyone happen to know what the rules on dildos/vibrators is? I don't mean the use of, heaven forbid that should ever get the go-ahead, but the inclusion of (strewn about the bed, etc). It's purley hypothetical, of course, and without being allowed to make use of them you might ask what would be the point, but it's just an area I'm not clear on. Also, why are the pre-10pm freeviews for the subscription channels allowed to show naked breasts? RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 08-06-2011 00:06 There are no rules about the dildos and vibrators, same as boygirl content, they just arent allowed, same as boygirl content. Confused? Well Ofcom has a way of hinting. About 4 years back Sport was sanctioned for preencryption shows, and one of the things they showed was pixellated boygirl action. The encrypted shows were said not to show much - certainly not free stuff with pixellation removed giving ful on views - but Id guess there was implied penetration. Also there were the Lolly shows. Sport seem to have done a plea bargin and "voluntarily" agreed not to show boygirl content again. At least not live. And they never did. Interestingly in the 4 years since noone else has either, apart from a few clothed POV scenes. Its pretty clear that while Ofcom maintain a pretence of not restricting content their body language says Go on, try it, like a nightclub bouncer. Dildo use was commonplace in freeshows, what with Lymara shoving one somewhere unmentionable to Tammy sucking one and dribbling everywhere. Then it stopped overnight. Pretty clear again that a strong hint was dropped, but no rule for Joe Public to see. Hey, we arent censors, you can broadcast anything you like as long as we approve. They might argue that dildo use is seen by some sectors of the population as a bit pervy and too close to having cocks about, even though the attitudes survey did not mention this. They might also argue that boygirl activity, even unseen and nonpenetrative, is strong sex in a way that a naked model rolling around or two naken models cuddling is not. Go figure. For reasons that defy rational explanation Ofcom allow representative content in adverts for encrypted channels. Because it is "justified" it can be stronger than sexual content that is there for pleasure (babe channels). The irony is that an advert can be stronger than an advertising channel. Provided it does not cross the line from sexual to strong sex. If you could see it in a BBC drama or a Channel 4 film you can probably see it in an advert for an encryted channel. Minge, bum, group sex, dildo sucking, implied anal all permitted in adverts. Hope that helps you script you commercial for the Church fete. RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 08-06-2011 12:52 It's fucking barmy, eccles. That's all I can say, but thanks for the explanation. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Tonywauk - 08-06-2011 14:18 And of course, although they were only used within the context of FTA restrictions, toys were an integral part of the babe shows for some considerable time. RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 09-06-2011 22:44 hi guys im confused about the watershed rules how come a mainstream program can include strong language just after 9 pm, a babechannnel has to wait to 10 pm for any nudity and a pay channel preview can depict topless girls in sexual imagery at 9.40 pm. yet phone sex line advert can show topless image at 9 pm also as a sky viewer i can watch 15 rated films with a combination of nudity or voilence at 8 pm could somebody please explain why this is the case p.s has nipple sucking been outlawed on babe channels hope the answer is straight forward though i supect it isnt many thanks RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 09-06-2011 22:51 (09-06-2011 22:44 )jimmyt73 Wrote: hi guys im confused about the watershed rules how come a mainstream program can include strong language just after 9 pm, a babechannnel has to wait to 10 pm for any nudity and a pay channel preview can depict topless girls in sexual imagery at 9.40 pm. yet phone sex line advert can show topless image at 9 pm also as a sky viewer i can watch 15 rated films with a combination of nudity or voilence at 8 pm could somebody please explain why this is the case Hypocrisy, abuse of power are some of the reasons. Ofcom can't really regulate already recorded programs, and are much more lenient with them on the regular channels. They can however have almost maximum control over the 900 channels, which they abuse on a regular basis for immature reasons and financial gain. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 09-06-2011 23:04 I certainly don't think that within the next few years that'll we'll be much behind the rest of Europe, change is inevitable but it's a long slow process, could Cameron in the end ditch Ofcom afterall, I mean the future of Ofcom hardly looks rosy at the moment, what with the scandal of one of it's former IT Services Chief Jurgen Whitehouse embezzling more than £500,000 out of the company, surely enough is enough and all association with Ofcom will come crashing down before not too long as I have a feeling he's just one of a bunch of Ofcom bosse's making a tidy small fortune, who's to say that all the fines the babe channels have received down the years hasn't simply just gone into lining the pockets at Ofcom HQ and the truth will all come out sooner or later. RE: Ofcom Discussion - SYBORG666 - 09-06-2011 23:21 Ofcom are just a bunch of blue-collars on a power trip and love to abuse their power. I think (hope) eventually things will change for the better due to the friction between Cameron and Clegg leading to eventual demise of the coalition government but it won't happen over night. P.S. I still haven't had a detailed response from the letter I sent to 10 Downing Street but i'm not surprised. I'll let you know if I get one and what they said. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 10-06-2011 00:18 Was meant to post this ages ago after finding it on another site. Quote:The broadcasting company of Babestation has a Dutch license of the Dutch Media Authority for broadcasting and is affiliated to NICAM. Therefore it has to comply with the Dutch law and the Dutch Kijkwijzer rules for the protection of children against harmful television programs. The Dutch rules differ from the rules in United Kingdom. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 10-06-2011 02:48 (10-06-2011 00:18 )Chilly Wrote: Was meant to post this ages ago after finding it on another site. Yeah, but they still have to follow Ofcom's rules, I would think, though the lack of investigations is odd. |