![]() |
Danica - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255) +----- Forum: Former Studio 66 babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=311) +----- Thread: Danica - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=11436) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 |
RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 13-05-2011 16:50 (13-05-2011 15:24 )alexxxi Wrote: If she turns up that is.... people moan about danica for a reason, and majority of the moaners have been fans of danica who obviously given up on her due to her poor, sluggish performances. Fair enuf that could be her style then so be it but its obvious when members post comment in here saying "fantastic show by danica" when its not exactly true people need to man up and post what they really think instead of having their "fanboy" goggles on. Wazo for instance defends dionne to a certain extent but still give criticism of dionne when shes poor. So anybody that thinks different about a performance now has 'fanboy goggles' who the fuck decided what makes a decent performance? Is there a set or rules that defines said performances? As it's been noted quite alot that Lori puts alot of energy into her performance which alot of people don't like, does anyone that like her performance have 'fanboy googles' on? Everyone has a differrant idea of performance, what gives you the right to belittle & pretty much call them liars just cause your so narrow minded to understand that people have different tastes when it comes to performance? Would it be fair for me to call you a sheep cause your following the majority? RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - chrislatimer - 13-05-2011 17:12 What the hell has this thread turned into. fi got brinsford calling me(not just me i know)- a moaner because i clearly saw a very boring danica show on wednesday the 2 4 1 was a disaster quite frankly. That's a pretty sad assesment Brinsford, However you are within your right to stick up for danica without having to be subject to abuse for it (of course if you abuse others you deserve all you get) And calling people moaners is abuse . I think she should just leave tbh her heart aint in it really. p.s alexxi is wrong for the following comment in my honest opinion. Quote:Fair enuf that could be her style then so be it but its obvious when members post comment in here saying "fantastic show by danica" when its not exactly true people need to man up and post what they really think instead of having their "fanboy" goggles on You cant subject people to being bias just because they dont agree with the consenus of a majority opinion, sure the opinion is wrong but its still just as valid as any other opinion and the person should not belittled for making it. RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - alexxxi - 13-05-2011 17:24 People can think what they want... I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight... I dont watch lori so I cant exactly comment on her performance but I kno she always jumping around being exstatic when shes on. Its called figure of speech "fanboy goggles" - and who said I called them liars... I said for those to Man up who comments her being fantastic and praising her performance when it was obviously not .... as for the sheep comment... im from wales & theres plenty of sheep here but I'm not a follower unlike some members on the forum. I stand on my own ground and I like to keep it that way. (13-05-2011 16:50 )gazfc Wrote: So anybody that thinks different about a performance now has 'fanboy goggles' who the fuck decided what makes a decent performance? Is there a set or rules that defines said performances? RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - chrislatimer - 13-05-2011 17:28 Quote:I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight But what if people did think she was fantastic sure there wrong in our eyes but its still a valid opinion so would they need to get their facts str8 RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - alexxxi - 13-05-2011 17:34 well then those members can say what they like... im saying to those who say it for the sake of it. your more than happy to gang up on my posts ![]() ![]() RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 13-05-2011 17:48 (13-05-2011 17:24 )alexxxi Wrote: People can think what they want... I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight ... I dont watch lori so I cant exactly comment on her performance but I kno she always jumping around being exstatic when shes on. Its called figure of speech "fanboy goggles" - and who said I called them liars... I said for those to Man up who comments her being fantastic and praising her performance when it was obviously not .... as for the sheep comment... im from wales & theres plenty of sheep here but I'm not a follower unlike some members on the forum. I stand on my own ground and I like to keep it that way. These comments suggest you're calling them liars As for your 'gang up' comment, Aren't you doing the same to brinsfords post? RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 13-05-2011 18:08 (13-05-2011 17:52 )alexxxi Wrote: I have nothing against brinsford, u can ask anyone on here gazfc ....its called "Replying" to a post made by him. it seems like you want to pick out a fight which isnt gonna happen Are you for real? Your replying, where ganging up on your post Your replying, I'm picking a fight *Shakes head in disbelief RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - Rise - 13-05-2011 18:10 I agree with Quiquems here. It's ridiculous that Danica is singled out for the shooting range every time she is on. For a start, she pretty much always has a new or different look or style on a given night. Whether it is more subtle, edgy or sexy will be a matter of individual taste. But in comparison there are certain girls turning up night after night doing exactly the same show in exactly the same outfit in exactly the same positions every time!... but they seem to escape any kind of criticism on here. Bizarre really.. At least you never can be quite sure what you are going to get with Danica. As for the 2-4-1 situation, it's always been very clear that she responds best when matched up with predatory bi girls like Caty or Sophia (where she enjoys being the centre of attention and gets into it) or failing that with a hardworking performer like Lori who can generate ideas and energy regardless. Pairing her up with Dionne is always a damp squib, but that's neither the fault of Danica nor the extremely vanilla Dionne. It's an ongoing production faux-pas, that's all. RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - Chilly - 13-05-2011 18:10 (13-05-2011 17:59 )chrislatimer Wrote: well chilly i aint seen no fanboy do that myself not even the uber fanboys like mr brinsford here. Oh, he does. He'll happily tell you to give Danica a call if you want her to move about and do more, yet he'll then moan about how dull another Elite TV gal is. Now, if he was to apply his own rules that he uses, then you'd think he'd call that so called dull gal in order to get her to do something he likes. Nope, because it's one rule for Danica and another for someone else. Remember the cheap shot he took at Delta? Take a cheap shot at Danica and he'll get all upset over it. Again, one rule for Danica it is. ![]() RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion - Webbiola - 13-05-2011 18:12 Up until the recent absence, Danica's shows were fine. Not her best by any means, but fine with the pov stuff being the highlight and something a bit different for her. Having been away for a while and her freeview debut in the offing you would have thought that on the back of her higher profile in the mags it would represent an ideal opportunity. A chance to let the freeview crowd see what all the fuss is about. Instead we get possibly her most lethargic and lacklustre show for many months. Everybody on this forum knows that a 241 with Dionne or Danica only works with a 'proactive' partner........a Caty Cole/Lori for example. Both Danica and Dionne are stunning to look at and in the lads mags any of the almost static 241 poses would look great. I am a huge fan of Danica as are a lot of the critics on here. I want to be praising her to the rafters because she has given me many months of pleasure. I haven't missed a nightshow as far as I can remember but the other night I started watching Adele and didn't feel compelled to switch back. I agree that Danica has on occasion attracted criticism when others seemed to get less flack for the same but that is because proportionately more people post about her such is her appeal. That appeal as far as these shows goes is waning I'm afraid and it is in direct proportion to her waning interest. Sorry Brinsford, that's how her appearance came over to me. |