(19-04-2010 11:47 )babestation Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 11:30 )deejer Wrote:  Are they gonna have an actual "Live" Night on BSExtreme...with the girls who are up for it !!!

maybe later down the line

(19-04-2010 12:01 )cosmonaut Wrote:  Interesting idea. But I think it would be better if they have a live segment every night. I bought a night's viewing of the old Sportxxx show once and you got a live hour and then all the recorded stuff after that.

(19-04-2010 09:40 )elgar1uk Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 08:43 )coin Wrote:  Being very close to retirement age and a one time punter of "working girls", I more enjoy just watching the pretty girls and dreaming of my younger days when I had the energy to get stuck in! All you young bucks, get as much as you can whilst still young, it is no fun being old!!!

"A 76-year-old Nepalese man has become the oldest person to climb Mount Everest, according to officials. A tourism ministry spokesman said Bahadur Sherchan reached the summit on Sunday morning in good health and was set to return to base camp on Monday. Mr Sherchan, who is just days short of his 77th birthday, beat a record set last year by 71-year-old Japanese teacher Katsusuke Yanagisawa." (BBC website, report dated 25 May 2008)

(19-04-2010 12:27 )Sooky Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 09:51 )babestation Wrote:  this account is setup as way we can communicate with the viewers on here, whether it be site updates, new channel info, or help / problems with our channels.. hence the general name 'babestation'

it shouldn't matter to the people on here who is behind the username at the time, everyone works at Babestation so whether it's a web tech or otherwise, if you give an opinion which can be acted upon, it will be forwarded to whoever needs to see it

So, at the risk of beating my head against a brick wall, the goal posts have moved yet again. You (whichever 'you' that was) stated previously that 'you' were just the web team, originally only concerned with the website. Then, when Xtreme was announced, suddenly 'you' were a mouthpiece for this service. Now, suddenly, 'you' are a representative of the entire company. Therein lies the problem.

It is increasingly unclear exactly who 'you' are and what your function is. But then clarity has never been cellcasts strongpoint.

So we now have a situation where because we have apparantly been talking to umpteen different people, problems have arose due to a criss cross of responses (and indeed attitudes) ultimately confusing the issue. It is also very easy, when opinion has become less favourable towards you, to hide behind a "it wasn't me it was someone else using the account" defence after snippy, argumentative comments have been made - instead of making it clear in the first place that there are, apparantly, a number of people with access to your account.

I would argue that yes, there is a problem with more than one person having access to your account. Why? Because nobody else on here would be allowed that, so why should Babestation be treated any different?

It's simple - have one person who actually uses the account, but who may get info from other sources at the company - that way it maintains some level of continuity. Alternatively - anyone else there who wishes to be of help can set up their own account on here.

Babestation Wrote:i think you guys are reading too much into it.. isn't it good that you now have a point of contact? you're not going to get the CEO coming on here

We have had points of contact previously - with less confusion

And, just out of interest - if there have been a number of people using this account.....why has the posting style never changed?



*this post came to you from one of the many Sooky's who work here at Sooky Towers

(19-04-2010 13:04 )babestation Wrote:  not even worth trying to reply to anymore

although you think you know everything about us, you actually know very little

And the belittling tactics start again

I have never claimed to know anything about you - nor do I care to. My point is and always has been the (perhaps deliberately) misleading nature of a number of your posts.

For future reference - which 'you' is this replying this time

(19-04-2010 13:08 )Sooky Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 13:04 )babestation Wrote:  not even worth trying to reply to anymore

although you think you know everything about us, you actually know very little

And the belittling tactics start again

I have never claimed to know anything about you - nor do I care to. My point is and always has been the (perhaps deliberately) misleading nature of a number of your posts.

For future reference - which 'you' is this replying this time

*and thanks for your 'help' on the matter

(19-04-2010 12:36 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 11:47 )babestation Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 11:30 )deejer Wrote:  Are they gonna have an actual "Live" Night on BSExtreme...with the girls who are up for it !!!

maybe later down the line

I predict that you'll do it eventually. Introducing some live element will make the channel much more compelling.

(19-04-2010 13:12 )babestation Wrote:  as you've said you don't and won't use any of our services anymore, it's weird you have such an interest

When and where did I say this?

And the problem was your lack of clarity in the first place - why has it taken you this long to inform people that there are a number of you using that account? Would have saved you a great deal of hassle if you'd stated that in the first place

And, for your information - you don't know much about me either....you may assume that I am against you etc, but I have actually been helping come up with ways to sort out this section of the forum so as to help keep it manageable and perhaps reduce the level of criticisim/off topic posts being made here. Your welcome for helping sort out the 'On Babestation Xtreme tonight' thread so as to not have the info lost within critical posts

My point is and always has been - if you are representing Babestation in general, then you have an opportunity to address a number of the criticisms that have been aimed towards your company over the years (namely for being 'economical with the truth' etc) and paint the company in a better light by being more transparant. If you are open and honest about things (that doesn't mean you have to tell the forum everything, a company needs its secrets lol) then people cannot criticise with any grounds

As I said before in a previous post you apparantly missed -

Sooky Wrote:Don't fall into the trap of thinking that just because a viewpoint is negative that it has no merit, but those that sing your praises are somehow more worthy. Be better than that

(19-04-2010 13:23 )Sooky Wrote:  When and where did I say this?

And the problem was your lack of clarity in the first place - why has it taken you this long to inform people that there are a number of you using that account? Would have saved you a great deal of hassle if you'd stated that in the first place

And, for your information - you don't know much about me either....you may assume that I am against you etc, but I have actually been helping come up with ways to sort out this section of the forum so as to help keep it manageable and perhaps reduce the level of criticisim/off topic posts being made here. Your welcome for helping sort out the 'On Babestation Xtreme tonight' thread so as to not have the info lost within critical posts

My point is and always has been - if you are representing Babestation in general, then you have an opportunity to address a number of the criticisms that have been aimed towards your company over the years (namely for being 'economical with the truth' etc) and paint the company in a better light by being more transparant. If you are open and honest about things (that doesn't mean you have to tell the forum everything, a company needs its secrets lol) then people cannot criticise with any grounds

As I said before in a previous post you apparantly missed -

Sooky Wrote:Don't fall into the trap of thinking that just because a viewpoint is negative that it has no merit, but those that sing your praises are somehow more worthy. Be better than that