+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-09-2012 15:12
Again from what I seen last night too many performers were just lying there like a beach whale. Louise Porter is a perfect example of this, as is Sarah on RLC. 2 models doing very little. The only ones that got pass marks for me last night were Pretti and Priya and Jennifer Jade. The rest like I said were extremely boring and to call their performance anything close to what a nightshow should be is an insult.
To define a nightshow is not about how pretty the models look or what kind of outfits they are wearing, leave all that to the dayshow, the majority of us who tune into the nightshows all want to see tit's, ass and possibly a bit of pussy too. Although the last request is probably a bit unrealistic at the moment, also what gets me at the moment is all the shows look scripted and pre-planned.
It's almost like they have had a team meeting beforehand and decided the strength of the shows before they have even aired, whatever happened to the days of spontaneity, once upon a time they used to have a live feel to them, not anymore. Formulatic and going throught the motions.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - *Kal-El* - 13-09-2012 15:55
(13-09-2012 09:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote:(13-09-2012 02:20 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well Steve for as bad as the shows have been tonight, I've seen worse recently. It's almost like medocre has become the norm, and yes Caty Cole isn't the force she once used to be, she went off the boil a long long time ago.
As for Rammy suggesting that all the channels just instead go online, well you'll find a webstream for each and every single channel these days so that has allready happenedso what I think Rammy is proposing is that they stop all tv broadcasts, that would achieve nothing and ultimately would just spell the end for them as it would be suicidal.
BTW Rammy how's the tennis and football practice getting on just incase the shows get back to how they were in 2010. Remember you said you'd win Wimbledon aswell as play for Man Utd if that becomes the case. I can hear Andy Murray shaking in his boots and Wayne Rooney is losing all his hair again at the very thought of you being his new team mate
im not proposing that they stop tv broadcasts at all, just saying that with all the regulations the tv shows have to follow, i can see the shows going online to escape these rules. cant see it happen for at least 1-2 years
ps im hard at work on the tennis and footy sb
good point hannah's pet, but in these tough economic times, is there anyone with the amount of money needed to get a new channel running
I would like know how exactly you know that channels will be switching to broadcasting online in 1 to 2 years, well hope at your age now that your as good as Scholes and Giggs at playing football as Scholes is 37 and Giggs is 38
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 13-09-2012 16:40
^^^You do know the difference between somebody posting an opnion and fact right?
He doesn't claim to know, He's giving an opnion
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 13-09-2012 16:47
the shows seem formulaic and going through the motions because they all have to follow the rules laid down by ofcom and the producers/bosses are following the rules and they know if they go over them ofcom will come down on them like a ton of bricks. so they keep the shows within the rules.
the only real way the shows will get better is if they join up and challenge ofcom but there's no sign of that happening.
ive never said i know the channels will just go online in 1-2 years, just think they will if nothing changes with ofcom and the rules
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-09-2012 16:56
Rammy rules and regulations is no excuse for airing shit shows. You don't need to preach all the time about how ofcom will fine them for breaking them. The current ofcom rules permit full nudity after 11PM aswell as the use of the handthong. All the majority of us on this forum want to see is a decent tit's and ass show which hardly ever gets delivered these nights.
Far too many models on last night more or less fully dressed even at 2am in the bastard morning. This is just taking advantage of playing the ofcom card which many will conveniently play to justify a piss poor lazy show. Like I've previously stated I couldn't give 2 fucks about the outfits the models are wearing. I tuned in to see a babeshow, not a fucking fashion show
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 13-09-2012 17:04
(13-09-2012 16:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Far too many models on last night more or less fully dressed even at 2am in the bastard morning. This is just taking advantage of playing the ofcom card which many will conveniently play to justify a piss poor lazy show. Like I've previously stated I couldn't give 2 fucks about the outfits the models are wearing. I tuned in to see a babeshow, not a fucking fashion show
Just because its allowed also doesnt mean that every girl has to be nude, if all the girls were naked every single night, now that would be boring as fuck.
Clothes are a good thing imo, girl bent over in a secretary outfit or in full suspenders does it for me and Nothing looks better than Sophia in a catsuit
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-09-2012 17:12
Yes each to their own gazfc but the fact remains that the majority of the models last night were wearing outfits all night long. We need a balance and that wasn't present. As I've stated outfits should really be for the dayshows only. Women dressed up as secretarys just fucking bores me. What have the babe shows come to when it's difficult to make a distinction between a day and a night show
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 13-09-2012 17:52
yes it might fucking bore you sb seing the babes dressed up as secretarys, but it clearly doesnt bore the vast majority of people, if it did the babes wouldnt do it also it would be just as boring if the babes were just in lingerie all night and if it was just naked babes that too would be boring. for me it has to be a good mix of outfits, lingerie and nakednes.
its not difficult to make a distinction between dayshows and nightshows. the daybabes dont go topless and the night babes do and occasionally go naked. also you keep saying the shows are shit/diabolical and an insult, they clearly cant be that since you still keep watching them even though you regularly say you never will
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - marxian - 13-09-2012 18:33
(13-09-2012 16:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Like I've previously stated I couldn't give 2 fucks about the outfits the models are wearing. I tuned in to see a babeshow, not a fucking fashion show
(13-09-2012 18:01 )Scottishbloke Wrote: I love your avator Bailey, that one piece swimsuit has to be up there with the greatest and sexiest constumes of alltime. I hope you still have it along with the one piece red string swimsuit too which would look great on you again next time we see you on the nightshow
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-09-2012 18:51
Hang on there a minute marxian, it's one thing talking about a one piece swimsuit and another requesting a full secretary outfit. You cannot make any comparisions between the 2. When I posted that on the Bailey Cream thread you need only have to look back on the caps to see just how erotic and sexy that outfit was. It was sexy and erotic because it was very revealing. It left very little to the imagination and also it fell off very very easily. Big fucking difference there
As for Rammy saying the majority on this forum like to see the models dressed up like secretarys as opposed to seeing them in the flesh I'd be very interested to know exactly where he get's his statistics from