(19-04-2010 14:17 )Deb x Wrote:  I'm glad that is sorted out. I can't speak for anyone else, but it had got to the point where I was doubting whether the some of the information 'babestation' was giving out was accurate and sanctioned; that wasn't at all clear.

I'm looking forward to seeing this thread get back to the business of questions receiving straightforward answers now that 'babestation' is 'officially' an official representative of the company with backing from the higher-ups. I will not be expecting the CEO to post on here ever but it's good to know 'babestation' is a representative for him/her. I look forward to having a point of contact that is authentic, reliable, consistent and quotable. And accountable

(PS. 'babestation' - if, as you say, "as far as you are concerned, we are Babestation Xtreme..." you may want to consider asking admin for a change of username so your area/channel of responsibility can be more accurately reflected? Or maybe you have other plans....)

(19-04-2010 14:27 )babestation Wrote:  hi Deb,

we also update the Babestation forum with the latest website updates etc, so that's why we use this account.

we could register as Babestation Xtreme for this section if that would help clear it up, maybe even have a shiny Gold crest as our pic!

(19-04-2010 10:59 )sharinel Wrote:  

(19-04-2010 10:20 )Jay39 Wrote:  For me the real problem is the "unrestricted, uncensored" bit.

Most people believe uncensored to mean hardcore when in fact it just means there's no bits blacked out or pixellated.

As for unrestricted, if that were true then there would be no restrictions on what you could show. And yet you have repeatedly said we shouldn't expect any genuine hardcore material. Which means there are restrictions (the Ofcom code you all like to hide behind).

It's plain and simple misleading marketing which is false, I suggest you read through trading standard regulations! Ofcom would have a field day with this.

Ofcom would laugh in your face if you complained about this to them unfortunately. As you yourself pointed out they are being completely genuine when proclaiming it uncensored. Nothing is censored, just that a lot of the good stuff is cut out, but absolutely nothing is censored. As for unrestricted, that is a word which means absolutely nothing and can be stretched to apply to just about any situation they want to justify it as.

Now if you think that it is just the adult channels pulling this sort of scam, I suggest you look at the adverts on tv. If you cant find a dozen examples of this per ad break then something is wrong, it's the nature of advertising .

(19-04-2010 14:47 )Jay39 Wrote:  This is where I beg to differ - you say nothing is censored, of course it is censored to come in line with broadcasting regulations, and one thing I would never do is grass to ofcom when I completely object to their existance. My gripe with BS Ex is the wording of their advertising - uncensored, which means not subject to censorship, as censor means to delete or remove! Sorry if I am being arsey about it but it boils my piss when they are using misleading tactics to try and get money out of peoples pockets.