(21-10-2018 12:46 )Risk Free Wrote:  OF are going to get copied widely anyway

(23-10-2018 11:07 )HEX!T Wrote:  there not employees. there are no contracts signed, so the girls can come and go as they want.
at least going by caty cole.
who is also claiming to have apparently started all this when she discovered that the channel, there provider and there paybill company, have all conspired to scam customers knowingly and willingly...
she claims when she discovered it, she immediately reported it to s66 management, who turn round and demand 30% of the girls OF income to make up for the short fall in the now exposed scam.

honestly the whole thing started to sound like a wishful fantasy.
if there willingly and knowingly scamming people then its organized crime.
but as i say i find it hard to believe because ive never seen s66 act in anyway that implies organized
and when ive had a problem with my credits its always been sorted out within a week. ive never been over charged or double charged and never had any money just randomly dissaper out of my account. so yeah not sure what scam they are running. but i dont think ive been a victim of if (if indeed there is actually a scam)

if im honest though the whole thing smacked of sour grapes. girls have been doing way stronger content for there only fans than they claimed they were willing to do on s66 cam..
as a result guys were abandoning the cam in favor of the only fans. so the girls were and are taking business directly off s66 by doing things that they wouldnt do but were getting paid to do for the studio.

yeah i can see why s66 want there cut, and it makes more sense than them running a creditcard scam.

(23-10-2018 11:47 )HannahsPet Wrote:  Get the feeling most of the girls will wait til end of the month get paid and then quit

(23-10-2018 07:13 )Doddle Wrote:  S66 won't panic, they've still got Ella Jolie so who cares who leaves?

(23-10-2018 08:57 )msgny72 Wrote:  Facts:

They travel to the same venue on each occasion to carry out their job.
- An independent contractor can do this too so not unique to employees
That venue is owned/run by s66
- My contractors come to a premises owned by my company so not unique to employees
The shifts are allotted by S66
- I have a contractor with very specialised skills on a retention contract and I determine (with certain notice periods) when he works so not unique to employees
if they were self-employed they could claim travel expenses back against tax as it is a necessary expense incurred in order to carry out their job.
- I claim tax relief as an employee against travel. Note even an independent contractor can only claim for up to 2 years, as beyond that point, it is considered a permenent place of employment whether you are a contractor or an employee. The girls, which I find hilarious, can claim tax relief for things like tanning sessions, lingerie, and boob jobs as these are considered work related expenses; apparently they all use the same accountant
They could in theory if they were self-employed all turn up at exactly the same time expecting to be given the provision to work
- Nope contractors have hours of work determined in the contract they sign
They do not receive the full income generated from the calls they receive s66 pays them a flat fee no matter how many calls come in.
- That's not relevant. I don't receive the full value of the income I generate and neither does a contractor
They have to abide by rules and regulations laid down by s66
- Yep - it would be in their contract
If said rules are breached s66 is liable for the fine not the individual girl.
- That's corporate liability; it protects individuals whether they are contractors or employees. However both contractors and employees are responsible for things that may be inferred as being illegal or grossly negligent.

e-m-p-l-o-y-e-e-s.

(23-10-2018 12:33 )DB83 Wrote:  I can not believe that there is no written contract between the studio and the girl.