+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 17-05-2012 17:55
^^ So by that logic i have an idea...
When the girls dress in...say for arguments sake...a college uniform...Maybe they could actually teach a bit of maths whilst stripping, thus provide an educational experience to the viewer...Nudity would then equal education
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 21-05-2012 23:41
Sexcetera on 122 now. Full frontal for some of the women, without any censorship.
The adult labled channels are still not allowed to show a normal body part
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 21-05-2012 23:51
Now it's focusing on fetishes with uncensored penises, dildos up the ass, almost showing everything, nipples being pinched and hooked, whiping and more uncensored female nudity on show.
The babe channels are getting screwed.
Now a candle is under someone's uncensored penis.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 21-05-2012 23:54
Sorry for the tripple post, as I'm not very computer savvy, but a man was just shown completely nude with a poker through his testicles, stretching them beyond repair, uncensored and through his skin.
Hope someone is recording this. Amazing how a vagina is harmful on the adult channels that can be blocked, yet a split into penis is perfectly fine
The man was left with no testicles because mutilating his body is what turned him on! Much more acceptable than full nudity on the adult channels 
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 22-05-2012 00:06
Last post before I'm banned
, but another episode is on SKY 238 It makes the babe channels look like a Disney cartoon!!! A guy is currently eating a woman out, and it's half blurred, only to a tiny extent, and half uncensored.Another Sexcetera is on in an hour as well on 152. These aren't even rated 15 or 18, but S instead. HAHAHA!!!
Weird Ofcom.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 23-05-2012 00:04
(17-05-2012 17:55 )Gaz "AV1" Aston Wrote: ^^ So by that logic i have an idea...
When the girls dress in...say for arguments sake...a college uniform...Maybe they could actually teach a bit of maths whilst stripping, thus provide an educational experience to the viewer...Nudity would then equal education
It would certainly hold young mens attention and they certainly need to be held as young men consistently do worse in tests than women. Therefore net social benefit. Excuse me while I write to Mr Gove.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 23-05-2012 00:05
(22-05-2012 00:06 )mrmann Wrote: Last post before I'm banned
Another Sexcetera is on in an hour as well on 152. These aren't even rated 15 or 18, but S instead. HAHAHA!!!
Weird Ofcom.
Yes, but is he wearing a school uniform?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - fedup1 - 31-05-2012 20:15
(21-05-2012 23:54 )mrmann Wrote: Sorry for the tripple post, as I'm not very computer savvy, but a man was just shown completely nude with a poker through his testicles, stretching them beyond repair, uncensored and through his skin.
Hope someone is recording this. Amazing how a vagina is harmful on the adult channels that can be blocked, yet a split into penis is perfectly fine
Oh my goodness liking your posts so far,,IVE been fighting as to why penises are allowed on tv at any time but female genatalia is pixellated out/filmed from behind or cut out the film so you dont see it in first place..And yes the vagina is the most harmfull thing ever on tv its causes severe harm ,,according to offtwats.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 31-05-2012 21:03
(31-05-2012 20:15 )fedup Wrote: Oh my goodness liking your posts so far,,IVE been fighting as to why penises are allowed on tv at any time but female genatalia is pixellated out/filmed from behind or cut out the film so you dont see it in first place..And yes the vagina is the most harmfull thing ever on tv its causes severe harm ,,according to offtwats.
Thanks, but they do show plenty of uncensored vaginas on non adult channels. Half of the time they are completely uncensored on Sexcetera and other channels, yet the adult channels still need to be super careful not to flash at all
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Sootbag1 - 01-06-2012 19:23
(31-05-2012 21:03 )mrmann Wrote: Thanks, but they do show plenty of uncensored vaginas on non adult channels. Half of the time they are completely uncensored on Sexcetera and other channels, yet the adult channels still need to be super careful not to flash at all
I don't think people on this forum quite 'get it'
If the broadcaster is trying to get the viewer to phone up a premium rate telephone number and part with his cash, then Ofcom will not allow overtly sexual imagery to be used to entice the viewer to ring the sex chatline. If the broadcaster is merely showing erotic content for the passive enjoyment of the viewer, then Ofcom do not concern themselves unduely (unless severe offence/hard is caused).