+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - sonofapaddy - 27-07-2010 05:48
It would be nice if some one from BB,came on the forum and told us whats going on with there channels.Or are they waiting for the start of the other BB to start letting girls go as they seem to have thousands over there.I still think Bang Babes needs more new girls and not the same old tired faces back and start getting the day girls on nights and take a leaf out of elites book by doing that.Also getting staff working on there shows who do there jobs properly and don't spend there time yapping and listening to radio 1xtra,yes i have heard them when the mic as been left on,not that they would know that the mic was on with all the arsing about they do.They all sound posh or Cor blimey and are about 18 years old.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 28-07-2010 00:23
channel 911 Dionne was on they they turned her off and spent the last while displying ads for her pics its rolled through at least 6 times in a row it will probably continue for another while yet.
some guy had the nerve to come on the forum recently and slate us and claim that he's part of the professional set up and we should leave it to them.
well no, not if you take a girl off screen and replace her with slow moving expenisve picture ads
come on bang babes sort it out, its really not that hard to run the show get 4 pretty ladies and have live feeds and you got a show.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 28-07-2010 00:23
Emily said on the mic the other day the reason she was on so much was because she was trying to help the company out by doing loads of shift because they were desperately short of girls and had no one else available to cover the shifts . I don't know if it is just me , but Bangbabes seems to be very tame again , every time check out one of their channels tonight Dionne , Annie and Alex are all laid on their sides and very rarely if ever do any open leg or bum directly to camera position , in-fact Dionne came on the mic tonight and told viewers not to bother ringing if they want her to show her bum to the camera because she will not be doing it and told them to go and put a video on instead , just about every other channel on Sky tonight is far more explicit than Bangbabes , is OFCOM to blame again ? . I think the repeats they show highlight how tame the shows have now become because they are much better and explicit than the tamer shows that are now being transmitted (except Jets shows which are still very good) . I just wish Bangbabes can get back to transmitting some good quality raunchy shows like the used to be capable of doing on a regular basis before they get the nic name "borebabes" once again .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Donsman - 28-07-2010 05:42
Its defo a sinking ship, but once the knew channels started, there was going to be a few defections
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 28-07-2010 08:22
the speaking of emily she was on the re-runs last night. bangbabes has been tame for a while now. pretty much since "lollypopgate". they need to bring in new babes asap
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - speedybert - 28-07-2010 08:46
(28-07-2010 00:23 )mr mystery Wrote: Emily said on the mic the other day the reason she was on so much was because she was trying to help the company out by doing loads of shift because they were desperately short of girls and had no one else available to cover the shifts . I don't know if it is just me , but Bangbabes seems to be very tame again , every time check out one of their channels tonight Dionne , Annie and Alex are all laid on their sides and very rarely if ever do any open leg or bum directly to camera position , in-fact Dionne came on the mic tonight and told viewers not to bother ringing if they want her to show her bum to the camera because she will not be doing it and told them to go and put a video on instead , just about every other channel on Sky tonight is far more explicit than Bangbabes , is OFCOM to blame again ? .
Amazing that a model comes on the mic to effectively undermine her own show
Strangely enough The Pad is largely unaffected by all this.Still has most of it's top performers and still looks good.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - bcl - 28-07-2010 09:30
(28-07-2010 08:46 )speedybert Wrote: Amazing that a model comes on the mic to effectively undermine her own show
Strangely enough The Pad is largely unaffected by all this.Still has most of it's top performers and still looks good.
Well I guess they can't really fire her, given the number of girls left!
How seperate from bangbabes is 'the pad'/early bird? They almost seem to be seperate companies in terms of quality at the moment.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - trevor format - 28-07-2010 10:12
(28-07-2010 08:22 )Rammyrascal Wrote: they need to bring in new babes asap
I'm sure they're working on this and I think bang babes will bounce back before long. They have had sticky patches before.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 28-07-2010 12:01
yes they have and i hope they do bounce back but bangbabes have been coming on here for weeks saying there will be improvements and new babes yet nothing has happened and at the moment its pretty much just babes leaving bangbabes and no one coming in. their most recent additions were mai bailey, scarlett ohara and megan coxx and already mai and scarlett have left to other channels.
i heard emily say this about bangbabes being short of girls and dont think she undermined bangbabes as its probably clear to most watching that bangbabes is short of girls yet bangbabes's management incredibly are doing nothing
other channels have also lost babes over the past few months(especially elite) yet they have brought new babes in. In elite's case they brought in the likes of alice goodwin and hannah martin. they have also upped their game in terms of the shows yet bangbabes has done nothing to the shows as well and bangbabes is probably the worst nightshow currently on the channels
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - speedybert - 28-07-2010 14:22
(28-07-2010 12:01 )Rammyrascal Wrote: i heard emily say this about bangbabes being short of girls and dont think she undermined bangbabes as its probably clear to most watching that bangbabes is short of girls yet bangbabes's management incredibly are doing nothing
I was actually referring to Dionne's request to not bother phoning in for a shot of her bum and to put on a vid.You can't fault Emily's devotion to BB even if she does look ill(I think that threads been exhausted
