+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
the best? - broncobilly10 - 28-07-2010 20:29
who is the best at phone sex at bangbabes? was thinking i'd call some time
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mikeboob - 28-07-2010 21:11
Whats the story with the on screen number small print on 959, its as long as War & Peace. The same feed on 912 (which sadly is not quite as crisp) has none of that so about 70% of the screen is visible (and opposed to 959 where its 60% at best
)
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 28-07-2010 23:33
have to say in lovin dannii and lucy dominating megan coxx
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 28-07-2010 23:58
trying to call from Ireland this is the number quoted as to call 1580 920 800 but alas it does not work. anyone know a number that does?
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - TheWatcher - 29-07-2010 17:11
No wonder Bangbabes has become boring.
These are their rules (copied from todays ofcom report about the fine)
33. Prior to this sanction, Bang Channels submitted details of its internal procedures for
compliance with the Code during the course of the investigations. These included
guidance for producers, and presenters and made reference to the Code provisions
and to previous Ofcom guidance on issues relating to adult sex chat broadcasters. In
particular, the guidance for producers and presenters contained the following list of
unacceptable on-screen behaviour:
“Under no circumstances should a presenter use a sex toy on screen, or use anything
as a substitute for a sex toy (telephone, bananas, lollipops etc).
Penetration with any object is an immediate breach of the Code.
Camera men should take care not to film prolonged, sustained or invasive shots of the
vaginal and anal areas.
Full frontal nudity is never acceptable under any circumstances. This is an immediate
breach of the Code.
Creams, oils and bodily fluids should not be used.
Depictions of masturbation, whether real or simulated, is not allowed.”
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 29-07-2010 19:04
Well that answers the question as to why Bangbabes is so tame compared to other channels , it looks like they will be stuck with the nickname "Borebabes" for the foreseeable future , it's probably also a contributory factor to why some of the girls that like to push things have left and joined shows that allow the girls to be more explicit . I think Bangmedia should have taken out a Dutch adult licence the same as Cellcast , their girls would be able to compete with other channels on a level playing field with that licence , Ofcoms powers are strictly limited with what they can do to licence holders from foreign country's . You never see Babestation in trouble with OFCOM and their shows are far more explicit than Bangbabes , and their girls have far more slips than Bangbabes ever has . Maybe Bangbabes are happy showing tamer shows than other channels , there's probably a market for a show that the girl wear a lot of clothes and is only slightly more adult than the day shows , only Bangbabes will know if they are losing calls because of their shows being more heavily censored than most of their rivals .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Carl-Gen X - 29-07-2010 21:02
I havent read through the entire thread so apologies if this question has already been asked but what the hell is with channel 959? I'd estimate that one third of the screen is taken up with virtually unreadable small print(that I'd imagine no one would have the slightest interest in reading). Waste of space in more ways than one.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Chilly - 29-07-2010 21:08
(29-07-2010 21:02 )Carl43a Wrote: I havent read through the entire thread so apologies if this question has already been asked but what the hell is with channel 959? I'd estimate that one third of the screen is taken up with virtually unreadable small print(that I'd imagine no one would have the slightest interest in reading). Waste of space in more ways than one.
They've been using that graphic for ages. It really is the worst graphic on these channels, and that's saying something, as the graphics on the Cellcast shows are also shite. Oh dear, I've just slagged off the company I work for again.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 29-07-2010 22:02
There's nothing boring about Bangbabes tonight , Danni's solo sets are fantastic , real top notch camera work and more bum to camera positions than the previous shows , i just hope this is not a one off and bangbabes will continue to put more explicit shows on like this one . Maybe now they have paid their fines OFCOM will let them put out the same content has other shows .
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - speedybert - 30-07-2010 08:33
(29-07-2010 17:11 )TheWatcher Wrote: No wonder Bangbabes has become boring.
These are their rules (copied from todays ofcom report about the fine)
33. Prior to this sanction, Bang Channels submitted details of its internal procedures for
compliance with the Code during the course of the investigations. These included
guidance for producers, and presenters and made reference to the Code provisions
and to previous Ofcom guidance on issues relating to adult sex chat broadcasters. In
particular, the guidance for producers and presenters contained the following list of
unacceptable on-screen behaviour:
“Under no circumstances should a presenter use a sex toy on screen, or use anything
as a substitute for a sex toy (telephone, bananas, lollipops etc).
Penetration with any object is an immediate breach of the Code.
Camera men should take care not to film prolonged, sustained or invasive shots of the
vaginal and anal areas.
Full frontal nudity is never acceptable under any circumstances. This is an immediate
breach of the Code.
Creams, oils and bodily fluids should not be used.
Depictions of masturbation, whether real or simulated, is not allowed.”
They must really hate Amanda Rendall at Bang Towers
