RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - bytor - 03-04-2012 20:43
Pandering to Ofcom? If they didn't take notice they would be in serious danger of being closed down. Whether we like them or not the rules are laid out. Ofcom are the watchdogs, employed to see those rules are adhered to. Ignoring them blatantly would be suicidal for any channel. I personally do not see any channel any more exciting than another so not quite sure why Elite is being levelled for such criticism.
Before the Tories formed a non-mandated government, they stated they would close the babe channels down so perhaps enjoy what is available now while you still have a show to watch
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 03-04-2012 20:47
a fan of all the babechannels you say??? what complete and utter rubbish. all youve been doing this evening is massively bigging up babestation and really having a go at elite, wouldnt say that's being a "fan of all the shows" and a "fair crituque". if elite is being run into the ground then why are all the babes leaving babestation (at least 10 over recent months) wheras elite havent lost as many and have had added babes over recent months and have had guest us pornstars too
and how do you know it was georgie that made the decision on her own to leave elite?? what rubbish, it will probably have been a mutual decision why georgie has left elite and rejoined and probably nothing to do with ofcom.
eite arent pandering to ofcom, they are obeying the rules and have been investigated and been found in breach of the rules which is why they are operating safety first which is working as they are at the moment not getting seriously punished.
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - dan g 27 - 03-04-2012 20:50
Well we saw some great nude shows from Lilly Roma and Paige Turnah some time ago and there some other decent shows, so considering how strict the ofcom rules are, elite is doing ok
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - Woiiii - 03-04-2012 20:57
Compared to the other channels though...Not that great.
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - LittleEgg - 03-04-2012 21:02
All anyone can say with any degree of certainty, is that elite have added girls to their roster, and babestation have gone from having well known faces on a few channels, to having one decent channel with the same faces every night for the last 3 days...on sky at least.
The other channels are older women, and the other is this apprentice/masti. Both of which quite obviously are to save £££.
Nobody can know all the facts, but anyone with a shred of common sense can read this situation clear as day.
...lastly all the comments about elite being tame are a suprise to me, all the channels are much of a muchness in this regard these days. Certainly no stand out dirty channels like the 2003-2007 era.
[split] Georgina Darby - The Princess of Babestation 2011 - mrmann - 03-04-2012 21:51
(03-04-2012 21:09 )LittleEgg Wrote: This...
Any channel that pushes the boat out wont last long either, not that ANY current channel does.
Actually furthermore two girls across all channels that wear the smallest g-strings, one layer, and get into the best position the most frequently are Victoria roberts, caty cole, and her sister.
Two work on elite. Funny that.
Not to cause an argument, but this is not true. You're right about Victoria though! Amanda has because of the channels she was on, but Caty doesn't seem to be allowed to show or do what some of the others are allowed. One example can be Lori. She went nude all the time and in great positions, but I don't think they would let Caty do that, even if it meant more calls. Charlie has also stated recently that the producers don't trust Caty not to show something that would annoy Ofcon. I think all of the women there are liked by everyone, but I do think some special treatment is given to some, unless the reason for others being tame is down to them just not wanting to show or do more.
RE: Georgina Darby - The Princess of Babestation 2011 - LittleEgg - 03-04-2012 22:00
(03-04-2012 21:51 )mrmann Wrote: Not to cause an argument, but this is not true. You're right about Victoria though! Amanda has because of the channels she was on, but Caty doesn't seem to be allowed to show or do what some of the others are allowed. One example can be Lori. She went nude all the time and in great positions, but I don't think they would let Caty do that, even if it meant more calls. Charlie has also stated recently that the producers don't trust Caty not to show something that would annoy Ofcon. I think all of the women there are liked by everyone, but I do think some special treatment is given to some, unless the reason for others being tame is down to them just not wanting to show or do more.
What is not true?
Does caty get into a full array of positions? Yes
Does caty wear boring, doubled up undies? No
Does she provide pussy slips all the time? No but this is against ofcom rules, see bangbabes etc.
Does she get naked much? No.....but i digress, whats so special about being naked if you are stuck in a sideways position, and in fact totally restricted in what you can do. Give me a tiny g-string and a girl that will get into any position you like(caty,vic,amanda etc), over naked, but only able to get into the most snooze inducing positions.
Caty probably represents the absolute maximum that ofcom would allow.
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - dan g 27 - 03-04-2012 22:11
That Gemma Hiles one should do more nights, what a beauty
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - Woiiii - 03-04-2012 23:46
(03-04-2012 21:02 )LittleEgg Wrote: All anyone can say with any degree of certainty, is that elite have added girls to their roster, and babestation have gone from having well known faces on a few channels, to having one decent channel with the same faces every night for the last 3 days...on sky at least.
The other channels are older women, and the other is this apprentice/masti. Both of which quite obviously are to save £££.
Nobody can know all the facts, but anyone with a shred of common sense can read this situation clear as day.
...lastly all the comments about elite being tame are a suprise to me, all the channels are much of a muchness in this regard these days. Certainly no stand out dirty channels like the 2003-2007 era.
Didn't Elite sign 3 girls? Paige, Georgie, and Gracie? 1 of them has gone back to their previous job, and you haven't seen another. That point is pretty moot lol.
Disagree with quite a lot in this post. Dirty Wives, Masti and Apprentice all appeal to different audiences, no doubt they probably save money but them having a wider variety of girls (Older girls, exotic girls (I guess but, I don't really like using that term) etc etc) will attract different people.
Compared to the other channels (Mainly BS and RLC) Elite are tame. Quite easily the most boring of those three channels, but have some of the prettiest girls you'll see. Victoria, Sophia, and Charlie to an extent are the only ones that look bothered. In fact I think a lot of the girls are wasted at Elite.
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - cmiller - 03-04-2012 23:53
^^^ don't forget Victoria hasn't been at Elite that long. Paige Turnah, Rosie-Lee and Lolly Catherine are all new as well
EDIT - make that <<<
|