+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 12-06-2012 01:24
Embarrassing Bodies - Live from the Clinic
The fact that Ofcom are still falling for this 'educational' bollocks is just more proof of their utter incompetence and failure to understand what's going on.
In tonight's episode they had some piece on the workings of the female reproductive system, or some such bollocks (I was fast forwarding and had the mute on) and to demonstrate this they had two women, totally naked, standing there with the reproductive system drawn onto their belly. This section of the show included several close up shots of their lower halves, complete with pussy slit and hanging labia.
My point to all this is that there was absolutely no reason whatsoever why this particular 'lesson' couldn't have been done with the use of diagrams. The only thing being discussed and examined was the FRS that was drawn on their belly, so why did we need the naked women?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 12-06-2012 23:02
I guess that would be Channel 4 at 11:55pm. You really do exaggerate Stan, it was nowhere near that explicit.
![[Image: C4_1234.jpg]](http://s13.postimage.org/q1hem6qmv/C4_1234.jpg)
Oh.
Tomorrow (Tuesday) - Channel 4 8pm "The urologist Paul Anderson visits the studio to discuss male genital and testicular problems, while Dawn Harper discusses the health benefits of eating Brussels sprouts (HD)". Better open the windows then.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 13-06-2012 12:21
That's the one, eccles.
I would dearly love to get hold of the head of Ofcom, show him this, and ask him to justify it and explain why it couldn't have been done with the use of diagrams.
Educational Context my fucking arse!!
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - blackjaques - 13-06-2012 21:09
(13-06-2012 12:21 )StanTheMan Wrote: That's the one, eccles.
I would dearly love to get hold of the head of Ofcom, show him this, and ask him to justify it and explain why it couldn't have been done with the use of diagrams.
Educational Context my fucking arse!!
Stan, it's so easy. All you have to do is tell your penis not to have an erection when you look at these images.
Everything will be fine then as these are educational programmes.
Mind you, I tried it and failed. I wonder if there's an inbuilt mechanism in males which, when you see a naked woman, you get an erection. Perhaps there is. Someone should tell Ofcon. They don't know what they are missing.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - The realXFactor - 13-06-2012 21:21
(13-06-2012 21:09 )blackjaques Wrote: Mind you, I tried it and failed. I wonder if there's an inbuilt mechanism in males which, when you see a naked woman, you get an erection. Perhaps there is. Someone should tell Ofcon. They don't know what they are missing.
Waste of time. Ofcom are a load of c#nts and therefore unable to get erections
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 13-06-2012 21:45
(13-06-2012 21:09 )blackjaques Wrote:(13-06-2012 12:21 )StanTheMan Wrote: That's the one, eccles.
I would dearly love to get hold of the head of Ofcom, show him this, and ask him to justify it and explain why it couldn't have been done with the use of diagrams.
Educational Context my fucking arse!!
Stan, it's so easy. All you have to do is tell your penis not to have an erection when you look at these images.
Everything will be fine then as these are educational programmes.
Well not that I'd ever admit this to Ofcom and fuel their argument, but it kinda works. These kind of programmes don't arouse me in the slightest - they just irritate me.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 17-06-2012 13:47
Once again may I use the word contradiction, here we have Sky Arts showing Spencer Tunick's naked states documentry on a Sunday afternoon right now, what I have seen is more than is allowed to be broadcast on a late night babe channel. What's the fucking point anymore when we continue to see this type of inconsistency taken place.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - skully - 18-06-2012 14:52
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but it doesn't count, it's art.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - shankey! - 18-06-2012 17:52
you get pleasure from art if your a fan of the artist,exactly the same in my eyes as being a fan of a girl on the channels,your admiring her for your pleasure no matter what the reason
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - flumpertron - 18-06-2012 18:02
(18-06-2012 14:52 )skully Wrote: I don't want to sound like a broken record, but it doesn't count, it's art.
Theres high art and low art. Sky arts likes to think it deals with high art (although I regularly see Zoe Ball on the channel) . The babe channels are regarded by ofcom as the lowest art possible ie nude modelling with a view to tittilate. Maybe if they renamed them "The Burlesque channels" rather than the babe channels we can all celebrate a higher class of wank.