Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - operoc25 - 08-07-2011 18:53 (08-07-2011 18:25 )blackjaques Wrote: According to Ofcon, there are a whole host of kids watching the sex channels, both encrypted & unencrypted. Some kids can watch worse stuff on the internet than they do on any of these channels. What a load of shit ofcom come out with. [split] Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - derek purcell28 - 09-07-2011 00:23 i have somthing to say about ofcom fucking useless while ago night shows were realy good to watch evan the 2-4-1`s were good. Now ofcom has tightend the night show rules why do see girls flashing there pussies or fucking them selves in front of the camera NO YOU DONT Ofcom really need to relax the rules on nite time shows or we could be watching babes laying on there front not doing much that be boring. Hope ofcom is reading this. And if this post gets deleted i want to know why RE: [split] Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion - blackjaques - 09-07-2011 12:34 (09-07-2011 00:23 )derek purcell28 Wrote: i have somthing to say about ofcom fucking useless while ago night shows were realy good to watch evan the 2-4-1`s were good. Now ofcom has tightend the night show rules why do see girls flashing there pussies or fucking them selves in front of the camera NO YOU DONT I think that's pretty much what Ofcon DO want, Derek. RE: Ofcom Discussion - derek purcell28 - 09-07-2011 12:48 may be your but if we try to put presure on ofcom they may relax the rules RE: Ofcom Discussion - operoc25 - 09-07-2011 12:59 (09-07-2011 12:48 )derek purcell28 Wrote: may be your right but if we try to put presure on ofcom they may relax the rules Very good point Derek, if we try and put pressure on ofcom they may relax the rules even more that they are doing now and the channels WILL not be worth watching at all. Elite is boring enough already without them making the rules even more tighter than they already are just now. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 09-07-2011 17:54 (09-07-2011 12:59 )operoc25 Wrote:(09-07-2011 12:48 )derek purcell28 Wrote: may be your right but if we try to put presure on ofcom they may relax the rules Just hope it improves soon. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 09-07-2011 18:37 Well ofcom will be subject to an upcoming house of commons debate and you just never know, I would love to see a dramatic turn of events and for their remit to be cut substantially to such a point that the level of regulating they are doing at the moment just won't be practical and with the recent news of the world shutdown scandal all their attention might just be focused now on newscorp and Rupert Murdoch. Also as I've pointed out ofcom are only hounding the channels right now because of the people on the current committee so if you just had a few more liberal minded individuals on the panel then yes the rules could very well get more relaxed in the upcoming years. I still think say 5 or 10 years from now we will see a substantial improvement on the product that is currently being aired. Everything swings around in circles and so long as the babe channels are able to ride out this current storm then we should see a brighter and more prosperous future for them all. The big question is with the launch of XPanded TV imminent could this channel be the one to bring about radical change as with it being a new channel it will certainly have to hit the ground running in order to generate interest and calls or they too will face a very short existence in the world of the babe channels. Lessons to be learnt from recent unsuccessful channels, anybody remember Angels TV (That one didn't last long) and neither did the relaunch of Babeworld TV so like the old saying goes, it ain't over until the fat fuck sings. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 09-07-2011 18:48 yep aint over and hopefully things can change for the better RE: Ofcom Discussion - Renfrew169 - 09-07-2011 19:09 I sure hope you guys are right but my instinct tells me that it will be business as usual - it seems to me the only hope is that the NOW matter diverts their attention - but I wouldn't put money on it. RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 09-07-2011 20:10 (09-07-2011 18:37 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well ofcom will be subject to an upcoming house of commons debate and you just never know, I would love to see a dramatic turn of events and for their remit to be cut substantially to such a point that the level of regulating they are doing at the moment just won't be practical and with the recent news of the world shutdown scandal all their attention might just be focused now on newscorp and Rupert Murdoch. Also as I've pointed out ofcom are only hounding the channels right now because of the people on the current committee so if you just had a few more liberal minded individuals on the panel then yes the rules could very well get more relaxed in the upcoming years. I still think say 5 or 10 years from now we will see a substantial improvement on the product that is currently being aired. Everything swings around in circles and so long as the babe channels are able to ride out this current storm then we should see a brighter and more prosperous future for them all. The big question is with the launch of XPanded TV imminent could this channel be the one to bring about radical change as with it being a new channel it will certainly have to hit the ground running in order to generate interest and calls or they too will face a very short existence in the world of the babe channels. Lessons to be learnt from recent unsuccessful channels, anybody remember Angels TV (That one didn't last long) and neither did the relaunch of Babeworld TV so like the old saying goes, it ain't over until the fat fuck sings. I hope you're right, Scottishbloke. Ofcon are certainly doing everything they can at the moment to justify their existence. "Get rid of us and you will have every Tom, D**k or Harry applying for licenses to show hardcore porn" is, I believe, their motives for the draconian clampdown we witness on our screens. To an extent, I think there will be an explosion of available porn. Well, it is only natural after years of repression. Things will then settle down and the British will be as relaxed about sex as our neighbours are across the Channel. It is time to grow up and be totally relaxed about ourselves. |