RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-04-2012 09:15
think i can guess why it was a cracking night on babestation for you sb, lori was on and regardless of how the show was overall its a good night because lori was on.
you might not like louise but lots of people do and there is more to a show than going naked
also if bs was as good as you say it was last night, why was there only 3 posts about bs during the show then
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - munch1917 - 29-04-2012 10:05
If anyone is still dumb enough to be spending money on the 'chat to a babe live on MSN' thing, read Daryl Morgan's twitter feed from last night.
She was having a go at BS for some rather unsavoury things 'she' was saying on MSN. She then spent a fiver chatting with 'her-MSN-self' and putting 'herself' straight.
Geri and Camilla didn't seem at all impressed with what was being said either, the natives are restless 
I don't think any sane person would really believe they are chatting with the genuine girls on these things (same applies to all the other channels doing this), but obviously some people are still using it!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-04-2012 12:05
(29-04-2012 10:05 )munch1917 Wrote: If anyone is still dumb enough to be spending money on the 'chat to a babe live on MSN' thing, read Daryl Morgan's twitter feed from last night.
She was having a go at BS for some rather unsavoury things 'she' was saying on MSN. She then spent a fiver chatting with 'her-MSN-self' and putting 'herself' straight.
Geri and Camilla didn't seem at all impressed with what was being said either, the natives are restless 
I don't think any sane person would really believe they are chatting with the genuine girls on these things (same applies to all the other channels doing this), but obviously some people are still using it!
yeah just had a look at daryls twitter and she's quite right to have a go at the "unsavoury" things "daryl" has said, especially as it involves one of daryl's closest friends ex bs babe alex adams and will look bad on her and give her fans the wrong impression about her
ive never believed youre chatting to an actual babe on these things either. especially after one of my meetings with ex bs babe dionne mendez who said to me that when you think your texting to a babe off screen, its more likely not her and is actually someone else as there was just 1 phone for the "text a babe off screen"
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 29-04-2012 12:26
thing is i bet the girls dont even get money from the service so they are misrepresenting them. its got to against the law anyone work for trading standards here ?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - bytor - 29-04-2012 12:50
(29-04-2012 12:26 )HannahsPet Wrote: thing is i bet the girls dont even get money from the service so they are misrepresenting them. its got to against the law anyone work for trading standards here ?
For anything to be done they need to be reported first. If no one is willing to stand up and make a complaint to Trading Standards or CEP then nothing can be done. Only the guys paying for the service could take action (for being sold a service that was not as advertised).
The girls themselves could possibly take action against BS for false impersonation but BS could simply say it was some rogue employee and it will never happen again blah blah blah.
Doubt many punters would wish to go public either.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 29-04-2012 13:06
yeah like most adult services doubt many would complain and thats how the companys can get away with it
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - munch1917 - 29-04-2012 16:07
(29-04-2012 12:50 )bytor Wrote: (29-04-2012 12:26 )HannahsPet Wrote: thing is i bet the girls dont even get money from the service so they are misrepresenting them.
...
...
The girls themselves could possibly take action against BS for false impersonation but BS could simply say it was some rogue employee and it will never happen again blah blah blah.
...
Well, I'd imagine the girls do get paid for allowing their 'image' to be used in this way, either those that agree get paid extra, or it is a standard part of the contract and covered in their normal appearance fee.
The issue is not so much that the company is representing them in this way, but more the manner in which they are representing them, i.e. the nature of what is being said in their name. They clearly need some stricter vetting procedures in place, else the girls could revolt and pull the plug on another revenue stream.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - anchorman - 29-04-2012 17:19
(29-04-2012 09:15 )Rammyrascal Wrote: also if bs was as good as you say it was last night, why was there only 3 posts about bs during the show then
Maybe their hands were busy watching a fantastic show!!!
Anyone who thinks bs isn't the best channel need to look at this latest vid... http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=43987&pid=1047763#pid1047763

Cheers tintin
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - magnesia5040 - 29-04-2012 17:39
(29-04-2012 17:19 )babefinder Wrote: (29-04-2012 09:15 )Rammyrascal Wrote: also if bs was as good as you say it was last night, why was there only 3 posts about bs during the show then
Maybe their hands were busy watching a fantastic show!!!
Anyone who thinks bs isn't the best channel need to look at this latest vid... http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=43987&pid=1047763#pid1047763

Cheers tintin 
Yeah, those massive OSG don't make themselves. IMHO the spreading of bullshit rumours is the most notable thing about Daryl's comments. My fingers are crossed she'll move on.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 30-04-2012 16:52
well looks like a really dull night only lacey might make me tune in
|